So you didn't read the steak thread carefully enough to know when the steak submission cut off was or how to vote correctly, at least initially.

But you expected some mystery someone to read this thread and that thread carefully enough to know that your steak/vote should be transferred, which if they were following the steak thread they'd know they SHOULDN'T make rule breaking submissions, despite you not following the rules, and despite the fact that you never asked any specific poster to do anything for you.

Solid argument, mate. With posting like this, I'm sure you'll have free reign of OOT at any moment.

Well, that wasn't too difficult.

Oh **** you, no one is worse than those people.

M,

Why do you think I should bother to come look in some other thread for steak thread votes?

Did you take the time to PM anyone and ask them to post your vote in the appropriate thread? If not, why not? Why should I or anyone else go through the effort for you if you didn't even make the effort to get it posted in the right place?

Take responsibility for your own actions instead of always blaming others and acting like the victim.

I missed nit's vote in the tally. See his response to that in the steak thread to see how a normal person reacts.

Yeah I was pretty proud I came up with them after spending a solid two minutes trying to brainstorm a uniquely indefensible group.

smh just sad

Small clits are out in force today.

A steak submission can be posted in the steak thread at anytime. Yeah, it's my bad for not finding the post that stated the cut off day. I knew El D was reading this thread and others that were involved in the steak thread. I figured El D would just count my vote from here. I did ask if someone would post my steak if I posted it here before I went through the trouble. But you are correct, I did not specifically ask a particular person to do it, so my argument isn't as strong as it would have been if I asked someone and they just didn't do it.

You know I'm almost tempted to post a photo defending my robust clitoris.

Almost.

M,

Have you paid Gregorio his $50?

Are you taking me up on the bet I proposed with the modifications made per your request?

You are contained. That means you don't get to play in any reindeer games. Your vote doesn't count.

He said you missed it just like I quoted your post here and said. You then added his and ignored mine.

Nope. The eligibility was anyone who had posted a steak in the steak thread before. No mention of being contained as a disqualification.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I stand corrected. I'm glad it all worked out for you. Good luck in the contest.

Your vote was disqualified because you didn't submit a steak in time. Only steak entrants had a vote. I don't even read that thread and I picked that up in this thread.

This post is neutral.

I mean, you do see the irony of this entire loldrama, right?

Whether the response were the right amount or content to meet whatever need you had, several people responded to you ITT when you were suicidal. You basically insulted every single one of them by suggesting only personal messages merited a response.

And you wonder why people aren't bending over backwards to do you a favor. The mind boggles.

MLY,
Nobody gives a **** about you, your vote, or your ****ty steak. Get over it

I'm going to classify cs3's post as a negative.

By performing this service for MLYLT, this post is a positive.

It's rare.

M,


See, you construct your own made up reality to support whatever bull**** narrative you want to believe.

I didn't add his because it didn't matter at that point, just like yours didn't matter at that point.

No.

I'm not taking you up on the bet. The few positive comments are clustered and I have estimated a 12% chance that the days looked at would fall on one of the clusters. And I would have to decide what constitutes as a positive comment and I would have to read through all of the post to verify. $1000 isn't worth my time or the mental anguish or me being triggered again by going back and reading the hundreds(thousands depending on the time frame)of negative post I've already read and suffered from.

Maybe I would do it if I had a representative and I trusted their judgment, so I wouldn't have to read the negative again. And the entirety of the containment was looked at with an exact count of all post.

Spider, I think it gets 2 negative votes.
1 for the initial post, and one for the edit. Not positive though.

M will have to clarify because she said that she would only count one negative per post but she didn't mention anything about edits, which are more like an additional post added onto the original imo.

This is a neutral post because I did not call M an idiot or a sceaming *****.

M,

No, you're not taking the bet because you know your 100:1 claim is idiotically absurd.

Gosh, I know if I suffered mental anguish from reading and posting on a website, it would totally be a daily destination for me. GTFO.

How else can she remotely manipulate Code3?