Quote:
Originally Posted by lapka
Howard won't get an aneurysm, but I will!
It is physically painful to me that an old real lawyer is able to present a sensible physical view of things in coherent sentences that make sense, and a young professional engineer presents something that is not just somehow wrong or does not correspond to the current scientific view of things, but is just a complete nonsense. I don't want to be thrown in the same pot like MLYLT! Not every woman in sciences is so clueless!
I am not gonna go the MLYLT's post piece for piece to emphasize the complete nonsense of that, because she herself states here that she is not sure what she is saying and has stated before that that all is just a magical fairy tale.
My 2+2 satisfaction improved since I stopped reading MLYLT's threads. Now I will learn to use the ignore function.
Lapka,
I think there is just a language barrier here.
The first portion IS the current scientific view. The second portion was theorizing of what the universe becoming total entropy would actually mean and kinda a play on how the big bang occured.
Instead of critizing me, why don't you share your thoughts on entropy in regards to the universe?
Sorry you don't want to be associated with me as another women in a scientific field lol. Please please tell me how I'm so clueless and how other women in science(like you) aren't clueless.
You said you do a lot of stats before, right? Care to elaborate on what you actually do? Exactly what field are you in?
.
Share with 2+2 what you were teaching those engineering students, in your sexy voice of course.
Last edited by MeLoveYouLongTime; 12-13-2017 at 09:57 PM.