Quote:
Originally Posted by garcia1001
NickMPK can talk about work all he wants as long as he's focusing on the emotions involved, instead of the technicalities. So for example, why does he love his job is it because he has the chance to really touch the lives of the families affected by statistical methods in whatever. Or because he likes seeing his students find something they are passionate about and really make a difference in the world etc.
Great point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Diablo
skunk,
"are we sabotaging his likelihood of finding a compatible partner by getting him to surpress that during the first few dates?"
I actually a while back suggested he put back in some of the stuff in his profile that more accurately reflects his personality, even if it makes him sound less exciting, etc. So big picture, I agree with you. However, I think there's a big difference between suppressing your personality and trying to give a good first impression. Nick should talk about things he's interested in and finds fun/exciting/etc. If some of them involve political science and statistics and stuff, great. But a first date is a time to woo/impress a bit imo; there's plenty of time in the next few dates to explore your "day to day personality" for lack of a better term.
I agree with you here. I guess my query isn't too dissimilar to "being the best version of you" vs. faking the funk on the nasty dunk.
Presentation is important because you need a little showmanship to spark interest, but for a lot of guys having trouble with dating, polishing the presentation should play second fiddle to doing real work to being mentally/emotionally healthier on the inside.
I think there are two sides to being the best version of you: the way that you present yourself, and the inner self that drives that presentation. Nick is prone to going down the rabbit hole because of his deep interest in his work, but he needs to balance this intensity with awareness that his work lives within a greater context, e.g. his life, his goals, his chosen identity. That context allows him to understand what it is about his work that interests him -- how it fits into the larger framework of his life -- and therefore what it is about his work that might interest others.
However, if his life and goals and identity and the entire goddamn framework revolve around his work and school (e.g. if every story starts with "At Harvard..."), then I wonder how much you can really sex up the presentation before it becomes disingenuous. (Not saying that's who you are Nick, but for this example, I'm using you.)
Dunno, maybe I just found some head-up-my-ass way to restating the inner vs. outer game PUA debate.