Quote:
Originally Posted by citanul
Fossil,
While I agree it's obviously true that the tens/hundreds/whatever of also-rans are part of their marketing strategy, I think it's pretty unreasonable to believe that they have anything really close to an individual selected that at this point. If you want to drop out, sure, but it doesn't necessarily make sense for them not to be playing this pretty straight at this point. Sure, they might have frontrunners, but there would be very little benefit to them to not actually having their consideration pool be pretty wide at this point. In fact, there's fairly obvious reasons why it would be potentially a huge negative for them to have ~selected a winner at this point.
Can you remind exactly what steps you have gone through to this point? Like, you've submitted some kind of written application? Have you submitted any video, social media, interviewed, identified yourself, etc?
Anyway, personally I can't really understand why you would drop out at this point, if you were compelled to do step 1. But it's your life. I just think it's slightly nonsensical to attribute this kind of "this game is rigged so I'm not playing" to a pretty generic marketing campaign. I say all that as someone who has run international marketing campaigns for selecting individuals for brand ambassador type positions.
I missed the earlier parts, only saw him mention dropping out of it when he saw they wanted him to post online about it.
But I work in tech. This stuff is common practice. It's called crowdsourced marketing. Someone in marketing says "I got this great plan to get hundreds or thousands of people doing genuine and heartfelt stuff about our app online as part of a job application process"
No job that is seriously considering a candidate would ask him to do that unless specifically getting hundreds of people to post about how great they are online was the end goal. You don't get product managers or engineers asked to post on twitter how much they love a company.
Frankly, it's black hat advertising as well as humiliating. If I were him I'd instead post the screenshot of that to my social media. No job is worth whoring yourself out like that publicly to all your friends and family just to be consdired for an interview.
99% getting hundreds or thousands to do this is the end goal. 1% some dumbass in marketing doesn't understand personal dignity - in which case you still don't want to do it.
I work in tech, this "crowdsource x" is incredibly common. Some companies even use fake job interviews to get new ideas. They'll tell 15 applicants a real problem they are facing and as homework for this very high level but nonexistent position they'll ask the person to come up with a solution to come and then discuss and walk them through for the interview. *cough* *cough* Uber *cough* *cough*
Bumble is just part of a conglomerate of dating services (some of you may know about Badoo), it's not really a true startup, just this dating services magnate got one of the early people at tinder that had a well publicized falling out to be his puppet to run his tinder clone - thus skirting a lot of copying allegations and potential lawsuits with one stone. Tinder itself isn't a real startup either, same company that owns a bunch of dating websites decided to have a bunch of their younger employees work together on a project targeting college students and then "startup" gets more free publicity so they just rolled with that.
Last edited by rickroll; 06-25-2019 at 01:18 AM.