Quote:
Originally Posted by ncboiler
Watched the first episode and agree with this. Very slow and not very interesting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTHR
All of these critiques are valid. It's super slow.
However, if you really enjoy courtroom documentaries and watching lawyers rip apart "expert" witnesses and things of that nature, it's worth hanging in there till like episode 5 or so when the trial begins.
I finally finished it. agree with all that was said. I would love more and more true crime films tbh. the more the merrier imo.
if its a 10 part episode series id rathr have it slow than fast.
my thoughts? first on the production, A+ loved how we got the look into the defense, would have been nice to see the prosecutions side. but I loved how in depth and we got a lot of rudolph early on, really enjoyed that., the final 3 eps were fine as well.
as for the story
this is crazy. from episode 1 TO NOW. I still say ****, that is not only a lot of ****ing blood for someone flling down the steps but those head gashes are crazy. WE ALL KNOW someoen who has fallen 5-10 sets of stairs and they never broke anything or just got bruised, its happened to me. so with that much blood, that gashes, I just say **** man, how doe s fall do that. how hte **** does someon falling 15 steps not only get all those bruises and all that **** happen to them but also DIE in a matter of mins. just by falling down? I know its happened and she was old but the chances are still pretty slim.
that being said
even if he DID do it, the prosecutions case, especially now what we all know, was so ****ing weak. I want to side with them, and I still might idk but their evidence was so ****ign weak, at the end of the day it was this and only this that "there was too much blood and dmg for it to be a fall" i know we didn tget the whole trial but **** they were so weak an pompous and them actually tricking the jury, its just not right. amazing what 5+ years after a trial you can dig up that you couldnt before.
i still dont know if he did it or not, but that prosecutions was weaker than casey anthony trial, OJ trial, steven avery trial, all of those prosecutions were awful but stronger than the ones these guys put up imo. again tho we dint see much of their side.
was well done, would love to have more discussion about it. seems like everyone is 100% he didnt do it camp.
HOWEVER I DO THINK it was okay for the judge to bring in the bisexuality and the germany thing, i dont se how it could be prejudice, especially hte German thing. coincidences suck but for some reason for a lot of famous murder cases...thres usually a reason.
will hope to discuss more tomorrow, I hope someone shreds my post and rips me up so we can have some banter.