Quote:
Originally Posted by dkgojackets
anyone watching now knows that it doesn't give any satisfying conclusion. definitely lessens the experience compared to watching live which was full of the excitement of possibilities
The "excitement of possibilities" is key. As I've written before, Lost is legendary if it gets canceled after 1-3 seasons. Lynch knew this on Twin Peaks and called solving the mystery "killing the goose that laid the golden eggs".
Of all the works I've read and seen and played where a lot of the enjoyment is based on some deep mystery, the resolution is almost always disappointing. People think they want to know everything, but in reality they don't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Umcle Diddler
LOST was probably the 1st serialized drama to take advantage of the DVR/internet era. It made TV execs realize they could produce series which had to be followed on a weekly basis which led to higher quality shows like breaking bad and others.
With a few exceptions, most TV dramas had a "story of the week" with some minor character development thrown in along the way(Law & Order formula). Now most dramas have a season-long arc. Modern dramas are 1 story told in 8-13 parts, whereas older network shows were 22 short stories loosely related to each other.
Lost leading to Breaking Bad is ludicrous revisionist history. Non-network serialized show in the United States where the creators are given freedom is mostly Sopranos as the breakout hit. Arguments can be made for contributions from a bunch of network shows before it (West Wing, Twin Peaks, Dallas), maybe for Oz and some BBC shows. The "Golden Age" (eyeroll) of TV started years before Lost, with Sopranos. We already had The Wire by that point also.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conz
No show stirred up more discussion than lost. It changed tv... For better or worse.
I'll be a lost fan/apologist for life... But i haven't watched it again and probably never will. It was an "in the moment" event every week. Lost hate is classic revisionist history.
The Jacob origin episode is the worst episode of tv ever though.
A work of art isn't that good if it's going to collapse on any subsequent viewing.
I watched it literally in the last few weeks, and the Jacob origin episode is better than most of the other trash episodes in the last couple of seasons, because it actually tells a reasonable story where the stakes aren't completely obscured. (Don't get me wrong, it's not "good".)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbaseball
There was a polar bear in the first episode I tuned it out seriously when all of the time jumps/travel started. It was an intriguing yet frustrating show on many levels.
Polar bear was adequately explained.
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.A.F.K.1.1
This is just completely untrue.
It might not have been in the same quantity as Lost discussion but to say it was not there or obscure is absolutely incorrect.
There was fairly substantial discussion of Sopranos online, and it also was a lot more elaborate than the example you give, symbolic nuances were discussed endlessly.
Also Lost started several years after Sopranos when there were just more people online and online behaviours such as discussing omg plot twist had more channels and was more established, so its a bit apples and oranges to make a direct comparison.
Yes, Sopranos talk was substantial relative to the state of the internet at that time, as was Twin Peaks talk. Twin Peaks is "known" to have been a trailblazer in online discussion of TV shows.
Sure, Lost happened on probably a grander scale because it was a network show after widespread internet use and before streaming/binging culture. So what?