Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW)
View Poll Results: Who should advance to the Final Four
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
178 57.23%
Rachel Riley
133 42.77%

01-17-2019 , 02:20 PM
Take your chump math back to the Backgammon forum, Poindexter.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 02:33 PM
Lektor if you really want to troll the tools just disqualify AOC from the rest of the competition. You can obviously just make up any reason you want.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 02:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wait
Lektor if you really want to troll the tools just disqualify AOC from the rest of the competition. You can obviously just make up any reason you want.
Now I'm split on whether this solution or the jman220 solution is better.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 02:50 PM
We need a superdelegate whose vote will count for more. I recommend whatever the delta is between AOC and generic woman x.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 02:58 PM
What about a literacy test like the good old days of the old South. Or some more 2+2 specific

Where does the brown trout sleep?

How many tackles for loses?

AQs or JJ?

What age of child is best for arena fighting?

How much should a boiling oat runner expect to make a year?

1 55 36 2 84 5
552 67 4 9
101 2 2
...?

Knife or bat?
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
What about a literacy test like the good old days of the old South. Or some more 2+2 specific

Where does the brown trout sleep?

How many tackles for loses?

AQs or JJ?

What age of child is best for arena fighting?

How much should a boiling oat runner expect to make a year?

1 55 36 2 84 5
552 67 4 9
101 2 2
...?

Knife or bat?
Or the classic: Gorilla vs 12 Powerlifters. Anyone who voted Powerlifters should be DQ'd.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
lol I love all the anti-AOC snowflakes who are triggered by this. And double lol at anything Killa ever decreed.
Whereas I love all the pro Sandy snowflakes who are triggered by this. God bless America where we can disagree amicably and not hate people who have an opinion that differs from ours.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patron
You see no problem with people who are told that they are (incorrectly) disqualified, but aren't the type of people to make a fuss about it? You think that type of voter suppression is okay? Because that is definitely happening here.

Calling that “voter suppression” is a ballistic overreach. Answering the question in a different way, I think Lektor’s approach to defining a reasonable group of voters for Ms. OOT is generally reasonable, given the amount of effort he has put into running this low-stakes, totally inconsequential contest.

I think your continuous protests of Lektor’s conduct are amusing. I don’t think Lektor is either incompetent or evil.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
SenorKeeed with the 3/5’s compromise ITT.

A 3/5 compromise in an Internet forum in which the stakes are inconsequential and being in or outside of the 3/5ths is within each person’s control is totally fine. Politics posters aren’t a protected classification.

Analogizing this to broader historical issues is ballistic and dumb.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patron
New solution for these people: Their votes are to be turned over to and instead cast by:



Spoiler:
divides_by_zero


LOL, +[undefined]
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:21 PM
HT putting "inconsequential contest" and "protected classification" in back-to-back posts is elite.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:33 PM
I think it’s ballistic, personally.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:35 PM
I don't know what is going on in here with all the maths (as the English would say), but Rachel Riley would solve any equation no problem.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo56
Whereas I love all the pro Sandy snowflakes who are triggered by this. God bless America where we can disagree amicably and not hate people who have an opinion that differs from ours.
Then I assume you voted for the American candidate in this match-up, did you?
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 03:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkass
I don't know what is going on in here with all the maths (as the English would say), but Rachel Riley would solve any equation no problem.
I look at her and all I can think is that's a nice tnettenba
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
I don’t think Lektor is either incompetent or evil.

How about both?
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 04:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
You are transparently doing whatever you can to block specifically politics posters by inelegantly putting your thumb on the scale for what it means to be an OOT poster.
You yourself said you didn't have an issue with this as it was his competition. What has changed now?
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 04:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
Hmmm after some consideration I've come up with a better formula:



A = 2018 OOT posts

B = lifetime OOT posts

C = 2018 politics posts

D = lifetime politics posts

E = 2018 total posts+1

F = lifetime total posts

G = total lifetime posts in ATF in threads with "politics" in the title+1

H = total lifetime threads started by user in ATF with "politics" in the title



1/G*1/(1000*H+1)*(A/E+B/F)/(1/100+C/E+D/F)
What about content of such posts in ATF being vastly non-political and about procedural issues instead? Can we factor that in - somewhere to the tune of 90%.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 05:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
You yourself said you didn't have an issue with this as it was his competition. What has changed now?
That's not at all what I said. I said he has the right to do whatever he wants, and I have the right to mock him for it. That post is me mocking his thin veneer of fairness when really his motivation was nothing of the sort.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 06:18 PM
Your claim that you know Lektor’s actual motivations is an absurd joke. The only person that can know those is Lektor, and I think as a practical matter it is difficult for anyone (including Lektor, who is no exception to the general idea here) to know their own motivations with anything close to complete accuracy.

Your mode of argumentation in this regard is foolish and juvenile.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 06:38 PM
You are assuming wookie's motivation here, HT. Maybe his mode of argument is intended to add an aspect of an underrepresented POV for consideration of the whole and does not represent the entirety of his view on the subject.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andro
Do Bundy's 100 posts in ATF complaining about being banned from Politics count as Politics posts?
Dumb ones, but sure.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 06:53 PM
Damn I walk away from OOT for a bit and this happens?

No idea who to vote. Just wow.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rafiki
Damn I walk away from OOT for a bit and this happens?

No idea who to vote. Just wow.
ineligible.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote
01-17-2019 , 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Truant
You are assuming wookie's motivation here, HT. Maybe his mode of argument is intended to add an aspect of an underrepresented POV for consideration of the whole and does not represent the entirety of his view on the subject.

I am not assuming a damn thing about Wookie’s motivation. I don’t know a damn thing about Wookie’s motivation, nor do I care what it is. I am merely addressing Wookie’s literal claim that he knows Lektor’s motivation, which is a claim that cannot be true.

Wookie may of course be hiding other information or otherwise dissembling, as your post suggests. But I for one take Wookie at his word.
Ms. OOT 2018: E8 Ocasio-Cortez v R. Riley (NSFW) Quote

      
m