The real pro trolling move is for politards to come in and vote for the Riley chick.

Wait Lektor is a politics poster?

I'm starting to think this whole thing is one big conspiracy to screw over Margot Robbie.

Typical pom trying to take out the Aussie iyam

Yessssssss

Howard,

The thread is locked so I can't quote it directly, but here is the post: https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...&postcount=263

"So: $200 freeroll for you if I inject politics into an OOT discussion at any time prior to November 9, 2019. Ombudsmen are LKJ, Gregorio, and El D."

You saying you dislike many of AOC's views seems like a very obvious injection of politics to me, but I'm happy to let the ombudsmen decide of course.

LektorAJ is being led on a politically motivated witch hunt by 13 Angry Republicans who are inserting their political bias into our great contest which we all used to love when it was fair. This whole “collusion” story is a hoax cooked up by politically biased posters, who made it up as an excuse for losing a contest that they should have won. Margot Robbie was 99% to win, or 99.5% to win, according to all the experts. But she lost and now they’re angry and upset and throwing a fit about it.

And by the way, you don’t know that these votes were coming out of the politics forum. You have no idea where they’re from. There was never any collusion!

PAY THAT MAN HEEES MONEY

Sure. But containment, generally thought of, prevents someone from POSTING. It drives right back to the question whether a vote is a post.

posts about Lektor's anti-Muslim views deleted. Cool.story.OTT.

Check out YakMelk's underage consent views for further reading.

A 4 was being generous - she certainly doesn't pass the pub test and the pub test is would you want her to be serving drinks in a bikini - a lot of you politards would salivate at the idea of seeing AOC in a bikini but it wouldn't be a good look.

Bundy seems to think Hooters is a “pub.”

Hooters girls wear bikinis? Having never been to one I thought they just wore tight fitting shirts (based on tv and movies of course). That certainly is quite mild to the pubs here in Australia. Maybe it is the family friendly environment that they are trying to create at Hooters, eh?

OK Sheila

So bundy would like to see significantly >50% of the population serving drinks in a bikini, but he doesn't think AOC is part of of that >50%?

"Pub test" lmao. Do you tuck your "Big Dawgs" t-shirts into your wranglers at said pub too?

There's a ****ing pub test based on looks instead of god damn good service? LOLBundy. Get a gf or watch porn instead of sexualizing every interaction in your life bro.

Sounds like a classy place, this Australia.

Too brown for OOT.

I guess that's why Denny's is failing in my city, after just opening, unlike down under. Where good service comes with a bikini.... ☺️

Hopefully No bikinis are getting worn in any pub around these parts as the beast from the east in due any day now...


https://www.itv.com/news/2019-01-14/...e-east-return/

Is this your first Miss OOT?

FTR, I am not a Politics forum poster and likely have over 1k lifetime OOT posts.

At last now everyone can see why we deported the people who became Australians.

Yeah because the poms don't like girls in bikinis do they

This is an admission that the mid-competition rules change was wrong and should not have been made, correct? My list was meant to show that the rules change was nonsensical and disqualified many of OOT's reggiest regs, including some who were already currently participating in the competition. This obvious demonstration that the rules change was wrong, is what prompted you to then include my list of people as now eligible voters.

But that does not fix the problem. As mentioned many times, my list was not exhaustive, and there are hundreds of OOT posters who were wrongly and unfairly disqualified, even though they are eligible voters. Several of them are speaking up in this thread, even after you added my list of people. There are still hundreds of correctly eligible OOT posters who you are disqualifying.

The only fair solution is to allow all voters and then disqualify those who do not meet the 100/10 rule. Others will help you vet the voters. Opponents of specific candidates will be sure to point out their voters who do not meet the requirements.

But the current path is still immoral and wrong, and unfairly disqualifies hundreds of OOT posters, even after adding my list. Please stop the immoral voter suppression and allow OOT to vote, not half of OOT.

This is not a fair way for this to work. OOT regs shouldn't need to come begging itt to be allowed to vote, when both you and the history of Ms OOT already granted them the right to vote at the beginning of the competition. Many regs vote in just a few rounds, or just later rounds, or some vote in the voting threads and do not read every post in this lengthy discussion thread. This is another bad solution to the problem that you created.

The only fair solution is to allow all voters and then disqualify those who do not meet the 100/10 rule.

This.

The only fair solution is to allow all voters and then disqualify those who do not meet the 100/10 rule.

This. 27offsuit is agreeing that the mid-competition rules change was wrong.

The only fair solution is to allow all voters and then disqualify those who do not meet the 100/10 rule.

If you go to restaurants and just tip because of tits instead of service you can definitely **** off. I bet the top tip is still 20% though. jfc

ETA: avoiding multiple bans for politarding and tips. ****! Thx mods.