Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread. Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread.

01-13-2019 , 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fossilkid93
Will there be time for another repechage or 2?
Tomi Lahren?
01-13-2019 , 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fossilkid93
Votes of group 2 are weighted 3/5 of those in group 1. It was the compromise needed to keep this thing going.
Yeah - pretty sure it is the other way around. Only way to keep this competition fair now with this new rule or otherwise we are looking at the same result as AOC won her last contest by.
01-13-2019 , 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
I'm an ex-OOT mod, I ran the contest the previous two years, I nominated two of the final 32 contestants and posted the nomination pics for two others (so am responsible for 12.5% of the contestants), and have 250 posts in OOT in the last 3 months. I'm not eligible? lol
That's more posts than me & I'm in... Wtf 😔 How can this be, Gregorio? After all I mainly post in ootv.

As I rarely post in Politics, I assume that's the reason. Can LektorAJ confirm.?
01-13-2019 , 03:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Calm down it is. I had to look twice for mine. We're in the 2nd group. Not sure what that means.
You post to quick..
01-13-2019 , 03:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Calm down it is. I had to look twice for mine. We're in the 2nd group. Not sure what that means.
Just the thing I used to sort the list by alphabetical order put all the capital letters first. I separated them to make it possibly easier to find.
01-13-2019 , 03:57 PM
would approve
01-13-2019 , 03:59 PM
Lektor has been running the contest and thus has the right to set the rules. I would argue that Gregorio should get an exception and be permitted to vote based on his prior involvement with the contest, his outstanding record as a long-time excellent poster, and his general good faith.

LOL that the politard AOC invasion couldn’t even be bothered to vote in any of the non-AOC brackets. Their intention was and is obvious despite jman’s amusing, clever and entirely disingenuous denial.

It is a travesty that Andrea Londo lost to Rachel Riley. She is this year’s Doutzen Kroes.

I am also pleased to report that Chopstick raised the subject of Ms. OOT at dinner the other evening and I was forced to explain the contest to Mrs. T. That went well. I am also pleased to report that Chopstick reminds me of Richard Nixon after his lengthy African adventures — that is to say tanned, rested and ready.
01-13-2019 , 04:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
Just the thing I used to sort the list by alphabetical order put all the capital letters first. I separated them to make it possibly easier to find.


Am I missing something, or is gregorio still absent?
01-13-2019 , 04:03 PM
Here is the list with more conventional alphabetical order:


The following 232 judges have made the cut for the Elite Eight onwards. Ladies will progress only based on votes cast by these people:

2ShedsJackson, 27offsuit, 702guy, abysmal01, AceHigh, Acetonitrile, ahmngrn30, alwarde4, Andro, applesauce123, AzOther1, Banana man, BilldaCat, BingoBango, blacklab, bobboufl11, BOIDS, BoKnows, boscoboy, brianr, BrookTrout, Buff Disciple, Bullwinkle, bundy5, capone0, cardsharkk04, cassette, CCuster_911, champstark, Chrizza, Costanza, crimedopay420, Damon Rutherford, DarkOne, DavidFongs, dboy23, DC11GTR, de captain, didonk, DodgerIrish, domer2, Dominic, DontDoItPls, Doorbread, Dr. Meh, Dragonbreath, DrawNone, DrChesspain, dth123451, duvvard, e1cnr, El Colchonero, ElSapo, erroneous, esad, ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S, evildeadalive, ex-why-zed, Extranjero, eyebooger, Falc, Faustfan, feedmykids2, fidstar-poker, Filip, Finger_Banger, foatie, Fossilkid93, frinxor, gamboneee, Garick, GooseHinson, grizy, Grue, gwp, Habsfan09, happy to be hear, Hellmuth was right, hotwings18, housenuts, Howard Beale, Howard Treesong, ICallHimGamblor, IMDABES, IRAZERIVER, I_AM_EVIL, JABSolstice, JDiamond364, JimHammer, jman220, jmill, JonnyA, jt217, JTJackal, justscott, Kamikam, KanMan, KansasCT, karamazonk, KDawg, kdub72, kevstreet, kinda, kingofcool, King Spew, kobmish, krunic, Kurn, son of Mogh, KYRounder, Laughlin, LektorAJ, LieutenantBroccoli, ligastar, LKJ, Loden Pants, longmissedblind, Lord_Crispen, Louis Cyphre, LrdNikon, madmansam, magking1, markksman, marknfw, Mark Watney, mattew88, Mat the Gambler, mdot20, Melkerson, MeLoveYouLongTime, microbet, Minimalist, Mojo56, Mr.mmmKay, MrAdvantage, mrbaseball, mrw8419, muttiah, Namath12, NhlNut, NickMPK, ninefingershuffle, NLSoldier, NMcNasty, NoSoup4U, nuggetz87, nyc999, NYYankees1387, Old Man Willow, OmgGlutten!, omgredbaron, orange, otatop, Papa Perry, PartyGirlUK, patron, Pauwl, phantom_lord, PhoenixLAU, pokeraz, preki, punkass, Punker, Rapini, razorbacker, rbenuck4, recondite7, redirkulous, Rei Ayanami, renodoc, Rizzeedizzee, rockfsh, Rococo, Rollos, rtd353, RunDownHouse., runout_mick, SaiYeN, SandraXII, ScottTK, ScreaminAsian, SenorKeeed, SenpaiSwift, SiMor29, sirswish6, Six_of_One, skiier04, slamdunkpro, Slighted, slothinator, smacc25, spidercrab, stabn, steamraise, sterfry9, Steve350, stinkypete, Stinky Stu, Subterranean2, sumey, supersplitz, SuperUberBob, TehVader, Ten5x, thabighurt35, TheChamp11, TheEck, thenewsavman, thereraise, The Yugoslavian, TJ Eckleburg12, tread lightly, txdome, Umcle Diddler, ungarop, Unjammed, uptheirons, vebio, wait, whatthejish, WhiteRabbito, will1530, WillieWin?, Wires, WLVRYN, Wooders0n, xlz, xukxuk, Zaba, zaephyr, zgall1, _dasein
01-13-2019 , 04:05 PM
Rachel Riley was my nomination & deserved to beat Andrea Londo, easily as she is the next door girl here in the UK, flirts with old men & keeps them alive for tea.

Alough it was a tough vote when LektorAJ had them against each other I just had to go for AOC after that dance video appeared, and also got put off Rachel after she beat up on a few 11 year old's at some competition.

+The Russian boyfriend also didn't help... Russia russia every ****ing where...
01-13-2019 , 04:05 PM
I'm willing to give exemptions for past organizers. If there is anyone other than gregorio please let me know.

Basically the computer isn't going to give me a list of invalid votes, it's the reverse - it'll give me the list of valid votes and the total number to save work from the previous nightmare of a system. So gregorio and whoever else will have to be added manually.
01-13-2019 , 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
Lektor has been running the contest and thus has the right to set the rules. I would argue that Gregorio should get an exception and be permitted to vote based on his prior involvement with the contest, his outstanding record as a long-time excellent poster, and his general good faith.

LOL that the politard AOC invasion couldn’t even be bothered to vote in any of the non-AOC brackets. Their intention was and is obvious despite jman’s amusing, clever and entirely disingenuous denial.

It is a travesty that Andrea Londo lost to Rachel Riley. She is this year’s Doutzen Kroes.

I am also pleased to report that Chopstick raised the subject of Ms. OOT at dinner the other evening and I was forced to explain the contest to Mrs. T. That went well. I am also pleased to report that Chopstick reminds me of Richard Nixon after his lengthy African adventures — that is to say tanned, rested and ready.
I think Doutzen Kroes is this year's Doutzen Kroes.
01-13-2019 , 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
I would argue that Gregorio should get an exception and be permitted to vote based on his prior involvement with the contest, his outstanding record as a long-time excellent poster, and his general good faith.
I agree, as it would fit with the theme of Lektor arbitrarily changing the contest however he wants, at any given time (twice now!), to stop AOC from winning.
01-13-2019 , 04:10 PM
Or allow Oreo to vote in contests not involving AOC
01-13-2019 , 04:14 PM
Changing the rules mid-election is riggage. It's a Voter ID law.

In protest, I will now offer my vote to Gregorio or other long-time 2+2ers who have not been included in the new, bogus, rule. PM me and tell me who to vote for.

AOC is a true grass roots campaign and will not be denied.
01-13-2019 , 04:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melkerson
I think Doutzen Kroes is this year's Doutzen Kroes.

Doutzen Kroes isn’t really Doutzen Kroes: she is a metaphor for unlikely and obviously unjust defeats. So she is Mike Tyson and the Red Sox and the Persians at Thermopylae all mixed into one.
01-13-2019 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I agree, as it would fit with the theme of Lektor arbitrarily changing the contest however he wants, at any given time (twice now!), to stop lefty politards from turning an otherwise amusing contest into Boaty McBoatface.

FYP
01-13-2019 , 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
In protest, I will now offer my vote to Gregorio or other long-time 2+2ers who have not been included in the new, bogus, rule. PM me and tell me who to vote for.

LOLOLOL. As if it’s not instantly obvious.
01-13-2019 , 04:22 PM
Isn't Dominic banned from OTT?
01-13-2019 , 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NhlNut
Isn't Dominic banned from OTT?
lol wat
01-13-2019 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I agree, as it would fit with the theme of Lektor arbitrarily changing the contest however he wants, at any given time (twice now!), to stop AOC from winning.
I'm arbitrarily banning Lektor and 27offsuit from CTH as well.
01-13-2019 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
FYP
Hahaha, I think that might have been a solid argument after the first change (the OOT post eligibility requirement), it's a bit of a joke now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
LOLOLOL. As if it’s not instantly obvious.
Again, as if it's not instantly obvious what's really going on here, while you whine about "good faith":

Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
in fact there is so much interest from newbies that it's no longer possible to vet them under the old eligibility system.
LOL imagine being dumb enough to believe this on its face. Sad, Howard, I would have expected better from you!
01-13-2019 , 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
lol wat
You were never banned from OTT?
01-13-2019 , 04:28 PM
Or furthermore:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
LOL that the politard AOC invasion couldn’t even be bothered to vote in any of the non-AOC brackets. Their intention was and is obvious despite jman’s amusing, clever and entirely disingenuous denial.
LOL, Howard, do you really think that if "the politard AOC invasion" had voted in all the other contests, that Lektor wouldn't have simply found a different avenue to disqualify them?
01-13-2019 , 04:28 PM
If you're changing the rules of the contest, change the name of the contest. This is no longer the "Ms. OOT 2018" contest.

      
m