Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread. Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread.

01-22-2019 , 10:56 PM
I already have double digit OOT posts in 2019 and over 1k lifetime. Plus I've been around long enough to remember the first time this contest was run.
01-22-2019 , 10:57 PM
All three are legit IMO.
01-23-2019 , 12:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
As ever, your logic needs a bit of an assist, JT. If all (or even most) of my posts were unserious, that would be a fair conclusion, but that’s not so.

This, by the way, is exactly how I feel about ScreaminAsian. His posts are often funny and interesting, but never ever linear or serious, and I have no idea what his actual real personality is like — he may be reasonable, decent and honest but there is no basis for me to know that one way or the other.

Your Friend,

Howard
01-23-2019 , 04:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEb
Same for me, my contributions should lead to my vote counting this round.


Same.

I vote AOC always and forever. Loooooool snowflake deplorables.
01-23-2019 , 05:50 AM
To add to the existing voting rules, I think that anyone that would in theory qualify but that hasn't shown any interest in the competition before this week, almost a month after this edition starts, can't possibly pretend they're not here for the trolling and should therefore be kept out !
01-23-2019 , 06:33 AM
Maybe they just found out they like boobies.
01-23-2019 , 06:37 AM
Sucks for them they realized it this late, they would have enjoyed Mudd.
01-23-2019 , 07:18 AM
Im a slow pony and not fully up to date, are the AOC votes mostly spite votes or troll votes?
01-23-2019 , 07:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoKnows
Im a slow pony and not fully up to date, are the AOC votes mostly spite votes or troll votes?
There is a difference?
01-23-2019 , 07:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamikam
To add to the existing voting rules, I think that anyone that would in theory qualify but that hasn't shown any interest in the competition before this week, almost a month after this edition starts, can't possibly pretend they're not here for the trolling and should therefore be kept out !

How many regular season NFL games does someone have to watch before they are allowed to watch the Superbowl?
01-23-2019 , 07:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis Cyphre
How many regular season NFL games does someone have to watch before they are allowed to watch the Superbowl?
Depends. Are they interested in the game or the entertainment?
01-23-2019 , 08:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
All three are legit IMO.
Ok.

jman220 has been encouraging ineligible voters to cast votes again. Should we expel him or something?
01-23-2019 , 08:16 AM
Yes
01-23-2019 , 08:29 AM
Voted AOC, even if my vote ain't counted it should be.

Don't know how long I've occasionally posted in OOT but it's been a long time. Don't know how many miss oots I've voted for but it's been a few.

Forget your dumb voter suppression rules. You're not going to silence my voice.
01-23-2019 , 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
Ok.

jman220 has been encouraging ineligible voters to cast votes again. Should we expel him or something?
He doesn't participate in OOT, so "expelling" him would be kind of pointless. He definitely should be disqualified from voting due to not participating in OOT though.
01-23-2019 , 08:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
Ok.



jman220 has been encouraging ineligible voters to cast votes again. Should we expel him or something?

Seems fair.
01-23-2019 , 08:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis Cyphre
How many regular season NFL games does someone have to watch before they are allowed to watch the Superbowl?
At least 20 over the most recent season
01-23-2019 , 08:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis Cyphre
How many regular season NFL games does someone have to watch before they are allowed to watch the Superbowl?
To watch from the sidelines zero, but if you want to be an official potentially involved in determining the outcome then zero isn't really acceptable (although this thread probably thinks exceptions should be made for people who were officials before the league commissioner was born and want to jump right back into it during the playoffs).
01-23-2019 , 09:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
To watch from the sidelines zero, but if you want to be an official potentially involved in determining the outcome then zero isn't really acceptable
That requirement didn't work out so well for the Saints this weekend.
01-23-2019 , 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoKnows
Im a slow pony and not fully up to date, are the AOC votes mostly spite votes or troll votes?
Mostly real votes from people who think she is hot, notable, relevant, attainable, and an inspirational, incredible human being.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
Ok.

jman220 has been encouraging ineligible voters to cast votes again. Should we expel him or something?
Cite? All I see are jokes.
01-23-2019 , 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
That requirement didn't work out so well for the Saints this weekend.
Ban for sports talk.
01-23-2019 , 02:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
Ban for sports talk.
Ban for ban talk in a politics boobs thread
01-23-2019 , 03:20 PM
lolol, even with his precious list Lektor is still furious at the idea of someone "ineligible" (the definition of which has changed several times under his watch!) casting a vote in Ms. OOT
01-23-2019 , 03:26 PM
Stay strong LektorAJ.
01-23-2019 , 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by m_hood115
Voted AOC, even if my vote ain't counted it should be.

Don't know how long I've occasionally posted in OOT but it's been a long time. Don't know how many miss oots I've voted for but it's been a few.

Forget your dumb voter suppression rules. You're not going to silence my voice.
It is weird how many people much more qualified to vote than Lektor have been disenfranchised and had to fight to try and be counted.

Everyone’s vote should count, and obvious gimmicks, post deadline accounts removed. I suggested at least been registered for five years but I guess that is not the kind of arbitrary lektor prefers.

      
m