Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread. Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread.

01-17-2019 , 01:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
If we're talking about the rules for next year, I'd go for pretty lax criteria - i.e. let lurkers vote too, with an anti-brigadering exception that if there is evidence of people recruiting votes in other subforums then voters thus far unseen that year are not counted in that vote. It's obviously up to whoever wants to run it next year though.



The oldest rule is organiser's discretion. The rules you state didn't do anything to stop brigadering so it's impossible to use them to run a historical-style Ms. OOT. Too many people jealous their subforums don't have Ms. competitions.

People who didn't make the cut as judges for the E8 onwards due to lack of involvement/commitment in Ms. OOT 2018 will be added to the list if they have 20 posts or more in OOT between 1 Jan 2018 and 29 Nov 2018 (i.e. sufficient commitment/involvement in OOT as a whole) and suddenly want to get involved at this late stage.

Just vote and I'll add you to the list.
Lektor,

You are terrible at this. You just need one rule: Anyone who voted for the loud brown lady with the opinions is disqualified, everyone else can vote. How do you keep making rule changes and yet still fail to prevent AOC from winning?

Regards,

—jman220
01-17-2019 , 01:22 PM
jman continuing with the politics of division, putting everyone into neat color coded boxes. So sad in this day and age.
01-17-2019 , 01:23 PM
im just sick of people whos whole lives revolve around political discussion and who jam it into everything they possibly can. i get it, your side is great, and everyone else is a moron. can we talk about random broads and post some gifs without all the bat**** banter? the fact that "voter suppression" is even used in a non-joking manner in a mss oot thread is insane to me. why did everyone **** up this silly and pointless contest so badly?
01-17-2019 , 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
Lektor,

You are terrible at this. You just need one rule: Anyone who voted for the loud brown lady with the opinions is disqualified, everyone else can vote. How do you keep making rule changes and yet still fail to prevent AOC from winning?

Regards,

—jman220
Maybe I was telling the truth when I said I didn't mind if she won, as long as it was OOT not 2p2 as a whole that decided?

My voting and nominating history in this hardly betrays an anti-Latina bias.
01-17-2019 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
Good idea! I nominate
Spoiler:
Ilhan Omar







Spoiler:
seconded...I find her quite attractive
01-17-2019 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
Maybe I was telling the truth when I said I didn't mind if she won, as long as it was OOT not 2p2 as a whole that decided?
As one of Lektor's most vocal critics, I can say that I think he honestly is okay with it if OOT decides that is the case. The problem is that he doesn't appear to understand what OOT is, and his actions are stopping OOT posters from voting.
01-17-2019 , 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patron
Not all people in GoDevils's position raise a fuss about it. That is also not exactly difficult to figure out.

Those people know more about their situations and desires to vote than either you or I do. Yet another further different thing that is not difficult to figure out.
01-17-2019 , 01:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo56
jman continuing with the politics of division, putting everyone into neat color coded boxes. So sad in this day and age.
Pretty sure you are the one who literally just made a post that put people into color coded boxes.
01-17-2019 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
Those people know more about their situations and desires to vote than either you or I do. Yet another further different thing that is not difficult to figure out.
This doesn't address my point. Are you saying that if some legit OOT posters wish to vote, but saw Lektor's OP's telling them they couldn't, and they didn't want to raise a fuss about it - then it is correct that they shouldn't be allowed to vote?

This is not a hypothetical. I have firsthand information of knowing that is the case for some OOT posters.
01-17-2019 , 01:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patron
As one of Lektor's most vocal critics
"one of"?
01-17-2019 , 01:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirswish6
im just sick of people whos whole lives revolve around political discussion and who jam it into everything they possibly can. i get it, your side is great, and everyone else is a moron. can we talk about random broads and post some gifs without all the bat**** banter? the fact that "voter suppression" is even used in a non-joking manner in a mss oot thread is insane to me. why did everyone **** up this silly and pointless contest so badly?
I find this whole thing highly entertaining. And isn't that the point?
01-17-2019 , 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
I find this whole thing highly entertaining. And isn't that the point?
I’m certainly having fun. I think most are.
01-17-2019 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
I’m certainly having fun. I think most are.
Agree. But I'm sure you'd agree that if the over-the-top, take-no-prisoners arguing style that is typical of Politics posters infected the rest of OTT then some sort of pogrom would need to be initiated.
01-17-2019 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
Agree. But I'm sure you'd agree that if the over-the-top, take-no-prisoners arguing style that is typical of Politics posters infected the rest of OTT then some sort of pogrom would need to be initiated.
My guess is he would not because he doesn't post in OOT iirc. As such, he doesn't (and shouldn't) care what happens here.

That said, he continues to have the best solution to the politard invasion.
01-17-2019 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopstick
"one of"?
Yes, he has many critics who have posted itt. If you want to give me the honor of saying that I am foremost among them, well, you said it, not me. Just trying to be humble!
01-17-2019 , 01:55 PM
patron,

you are boring. if you are going to hijack this thread at least make your posts somewhat entertaining instead of just incessant whining.
01-17-2019 , 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Alex.
I think the vocal OOT regs are just shocked to learn that the vast majority of 2p2 and even OOT aren't the sjw-hating deplorables that they are. So when AOC started crushing they assumed it must be due to being overrun by votes from other forums and rushed to change the rules. Now after multiple attempts including literally going poster by poster to decide eligibility, they are starting to realize that she's actually universally popular and short of banning her specifically, she's going to keep winning. Of course there's no real issue here that required 1000 posts of discussion, just a huge disconnect in their brains between perception and reality.
Lol at "they" and "their".
I have no idea where else you post, but every single post of yours that I've come across in OOT has been terrible. You never understand even common situations, fail to properly analyze any topics you discuss, and always arrive at some nonsensical conclusion.

So good job, I guess you fit right in with this thread!
01-17-2019 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
ScreaminAsian has gone full ******. You never want to go full ******.
He's trying way too hard. But his posts are still much more bearable than patron. Then again, who isn't.
01-17-2019 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patron
Pretty sure you are the one who literally just made a post that put people into color coded boxes.
Related: try to guess which conspiracy-level right-wing website Mojo picked up "Sandy from the Bronx" from! Was it Gateway Pundit? Breitbart?
01-17-2019 , 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirswish6
im just sick of people whos whole lives revolve around political discussion and who jam it into everything they possibly can. i get it, your side is great, and everyone else is a moron. can we talk about random broads and post some gifs without all the bat**** banter? the fact that "voter suppression" is even used in a non-joking manner in a mss oot thread is insane to me. why did everyone **** up this silly and pointless contest so badly?
01-17-2019 , 02:12 PM
lektor's extreme political bias caused him to call the oot community aspy nerds and then falsely claim he read it in the politics forum. He's a lying phony who deeply hates oot. Lyin' Lektor must resign now!
01-17-2019 , 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
ScreaminAsian has gone full ******. You never want to go full ******.
I honestly don't know why you're so hated across every forum on 2p2. It's probably your awful personality.
01-17-2019 , 02:52 PM
I really think I may be unclear on the stakes here. Is there some agreement that we all have to masturbate exclusively to the winner of the contest for some period of time?
01-17-2019 , 03:05 PM
Yeah, except he has a point about your (SA) postings in this thread.

Amazingly awesome as a premise and all have been hilarious....but has continued way too long and the joke has lost its luster imo.
01-17-2019 , 03:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Truant
I really think I may be unclear on the stakes here. Is there some agreement that we all have to masturbate exclusively to the winner of the contest for some period of time?
Only those with an O, O or T in their user name.

      
m