Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread. Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread.

01-13-2019 , 06:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
let's say aoc wins miss oot 2018. what effect does that have on miss oot 2019? by the rules of the contest she'll be unable to compete ever again. if another forum wanted to **** up miss oot (which there is no evidence of. there was never any collusion.) they'd pick sonia sotomayor or cynthia nixon, not the 29-year-old hottest member of congress.

there's no liberal conspiracy to bring down miss oot, believe me.
Thats definitely right because it wouldn't be liberal at all. However there seem to be people who take pleasure in ruining it for others and have posted in that manner about the contest. I wouldn't mind if AOC would win but I'd rather not have it in the boatymcboatface (Thanks HT!) fashion that is being exhibited right now.
01-13-2019 , 07:01 PM
I can get behind awarding Ms oot 2018 to Anna Kendrick. She was the last candidate that actually got me excited.
01-13-2019 , 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
Thats definitely right because it wouldn't be liberal at all. However there seem to be people who take pleasure in ruining it for others and have posted in that manner about the contest. I wouldn't mind if AOC would win but I'd rather not have it in the boatymcboatface (Thanks HT!) fashion that is being exhibited right now.
there are no such posts. you have been lied to by fake trolls. there was never any collusion. collusion is a HOAX
01-13-2019 , 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
there are no such posts. you have been lied to by fake trolls. there was never any collusion. collusion is a HOAX
It might not look like it but Im actually quite busy right now so, Ill take either a year long avatar bet or some minor monetary bet which I would win if I could find at least one (1) post where the poster states that he or she wouldn't mind if this AOC discussion would lead to Ms OOT to stop existing/there was some collusion/their vote is actively trying to disrupt this years Ms OOT vis a vis how it has been organized the last few years. I worded this quickly but Im guessing we can get behind the spirit of the bet at some point. It does not matter who the post is from, I just have to show you that your statement is false by showing you at least one (1) post. Let me know if you're interested and we can work it out.

Last edited by Yakmelk; 01-13-2019 at 07:17 PM. Reason: avatar bet probably isnt fair to you so willing to see alternatives
01-13-2019 , 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
It might not look like it but Im actually quite busy right now so, Ill take either a year long avatar bet or some minor monetary bet which I would win if I could find at least one (1) post where the poster states that he or she wouldn't mind if this AOC discussion would lead to Ms OOT to stop existing/there was some collusion/their vote is actively trying to disrupt this years Ms OOT vis a vis how it has been organized the last few years. I worded this quickly but Im guessing we can get behind the spirit of the bet at some point. It does not matter who the post is from, I just have to show you that your statement is false by showing you at least one (1) post. Let me know if you're interested and we can work it out.
that's not collusion. the only collusion was done by the people who are against aoc.
01-13-2019 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
that's not collusion. the only collusion was done by the people who are against aoc.
I have never mentioned collusion, it's possible that you're referring to the brigadering I mentioned. I wouldn't call brigadering the same as collusion imo. I have to be honest, I have not seen any posts like that myself simply because I don't enter the politics forum a lot/probably wouldn't read a thread about AOC. If you're saying there was no brigadering whatsoever in the politics forum I would be skeptical but believe you until seen with my own eyes.
01-13-2019 , 07:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I mean Howard's posting ITT is a really phenomenal allegory for the history of voting rights in the USA as a whole. 60 years ago he would have been laughing at anyone too poor to pay a poll tax, pretending the poll tax was the real issue and not just a means to an intended end all along.
Is this a direct or indirect tax?
01-13-2019 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
he clearly doesn't want her to win because of his own political ideology. he let her in the contest in the first place because he assumed she would lose, but now that she's winning he wants to change the rules of the competition in the middle of it. what a ****show.
This has nothing to do with her political ideology. She just isn't attractive. What normal OOT poster would want her to win? Seriously - get politics out of OOT. I support this move.
01-13-2019 , 07:44 PM
i've got more posts in oot than you do, pal
01-13-2019 , 07:46 PM
Offering $1 to eligible voters for their vote PM for details
01-13-2019 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
Lektor has been running the contest and thus has the right to set the rules. I would argue that Gregorio should get an exception and be permitted to vote based on his prior involvement with the contest, his outstanding record as a long-time excellent poster, and his general good faith.

LOL that the politard AOC invasion couldn’t even be bothered to vote in any of the non-AOC brackets. Their intention was and is obvious despite jman’s amusing, clever and entirely disingenuous denial.

It is a travesty that Andrea Londo lost to Rachel Riley. She is this year’s Doutzen Kroes.

I am also pleased to report that Chopstick raised the subject of Ms. OOT at dinner the other evening and I was forced to explain the contest to Mrs. T. That went well. I am also pleased to report that Chopstick reminds me of Richard Nixon after his lengthy African adventures — that is to say tanned, rested and ready.
That sure is some A+ detective work there. How many cases have you solved?
01-13-2019 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
nobody posts more pics in miss oot than me. year over year, i without a doubt post the most photos of contestants
Don't recall you posting any pictures of any social justice warriors before though?
01-13-2019 , 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
Here is the list with more conventional alphabetical order:


The following 232 judges have made the cut for the Elite Eight onwards. Ladies will progress only based on votes cast by these people:

2ShedsJackson, 27offsuit, 702guy, abysmal01, AceHigh, Acetonitrile, ahmngrn30, alwarde4, Andro, applesauce123, AzOther1, Banana man, BilldaCat, BingoBango, blacklab, bobboufl11, BOIDS, BoKnows, boscoboy, brianr, BrookTrout, Buff Disciple, Bullwinkle, bundy5, capone0, cardsharkk04, cassette, CCuster_911, champstark, Chrizza, Costanza, crimedopay420, Damon Rutherford, DarkOne, DavidFongs, dboy23, DC11GTR, de captain, didonk, DodgerIrish, domer2, Dominic, DontDoItPls, Doorbread, Dr. Meh, Dragonbreath, DrawNone, DrChesspain, dth123451, duvvard, e1cnr, El Colchonero, ElSapo, erroneous, esad, ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S, evildeadalive, ex-why-zed, Extranjero, eyebooger, Falc, Faustfan, feedmykids2, fidstar-poker, Filip, Finger_Banger, foatie, Fossilkid93, frinxor, gamboneee, Garick, GooseHinson, grizy, Grue, gwp, Habsfan09, happy to be hear, Hellmuth was right, hotwings18, housenuts, Howard Beale, Howard Treesong, ICallHimGamblor, IMDABES, IRAZERIVER, I_AM_EVIL, JABSolstice, JDiamond364, JimHammer, jman220, jmill, JonnyA, jt217, JTJackal, justscott, Kamikam, KanMan, KansasCT, karamazonk, KDawg, kdub72, kevstreet, kinda, kingofcool, King Spew, kobmish, krunic, Kurn, son of Mogh, KYRounder, Laughlin, LektorAJ, LieutenantBroccoli, ligastar, LKJ, Loden Pants, longmissedblind, Lord_Crispen, Louis Cyphre, LrdNikon, madmansam, magking1, markksman, marknfw, Mark Watney, mattew88, Mat the Gambler, mdot20, Melkerson, MeLoveYouLongTime, microbet, Minimalist, Mojo56, Mr.mmmKay, MrAdvantage, mrbaseball, mrw8419, muttiah, Namath12, NhlNut, NickMPK, ninefingershuffle, NLSoldier, NMcNasty, NoSoup4U, nuggetz87, nyc999, NYYankees1387, Old Man Willow, OmgGlutten!, omgredbaron, orange, otatop, Papa Perry, PartyGirlUK, patron, Pauwl, phantom_lord, PhoenixLAU, pokeraz, preki, punkass, Punker, Rapini, razorbacker, rbenuck4, recondite7, redirkulous, Rei Ayanami, renodoc, Rizzeedizzee, rockfsh, Rococo, Rollos, rtd353, RunDownHouse., runout_mick, SaiYeN, SandraXII, ScottTK, ScreaminAsian, SenorKeeed, SenpaiSwift, SiMor29, sirswish6, Six_of_One, skiier04, slamdunkpro, Slighted, slothinator, smacc25, spidercrab, stabn, steamraise, sterfry9, Steve350, stinkypete, Stinky Stu, Subterranean2, sumey, supersplitz, SuperUberBob, TehVader, Ten5x, thabighurt35, TheChamp11, TheEck, thenewsavman, thereraise, The Yugoslavian, TJ Eckleburg12, tread lightly, txdome, Umcle Diddler, ungarop, Unjammed, uptheirons, vebio, wait, whatthejish, WhiteRabbito, will1530, WillieWin?, Wires, WLVRYN, Wooders0n, xlz, xukxuk, Zaba, zaephyr, zgall1, _dasein
Lol, can’t even figure out how to voter suppress properly.
01-13-2019 , 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Don't recall you posting any pictures of any social justice warriors before though?
which proves that i am 100% unbiased, thanks.
01-13-2019 , 07:51 PM
social justice and economic justice are bad words to bundy because he is insanely politically biased. don't rewrite the rules of this contest to appease him.
01-13-2019 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
that's not collusion. the only collusion was done by the people who are against aoc.
So, a quick look into the AOC thread over in Politics not only drenched me in fanboi cum but also shows that posters are brigadering/in it to "troll" "maga" "cucks" "deplorables" or whatever. Its a really nice place that definitely hasn't got people like jman and rep(LOL) running around violently masturbating while using grown up words and in the meantime trying to ruin fun for other people. The interesting part is that it shows how polarising politics is these days, to them OOT is western Europe in 1941 or something. Its incredible.
01-13-2019 , 08:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
So, a quick look into the AOC thread over in Politics not only drenched me in fanboi cum but also shows that posters are brigadering/in it to "troll" "maga" "cucks" "deplorables" or whatever. Its a really nice place that definitely hasn't got people like jman and rep(LOL) running around violently masturbating while using grown up words and in the meantime trying to ruin fun for other people. The interesting part is that it shows how polarising politics is these days, to them OOT is western Europe in 1941 or something. Its incredible.
lol you really let your "detached observer" mask slip with this one
01-13-2019 , 08:02 PM
you're enemy of the people, dude. hate to break it to you, i'm just calling balls and strikes here. your entire post was fake.
01-13-2019 , 08:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
which proves that i am 100% unbiased, thanks.
No - I always thought you did it in the spirit of the contest. This time less so but not completely gone that spirit as you have posted pics of some of the other girls that are genuinely in this contest. A sign of perhaps your true feelings although with all your politard friends looking on with your comments I can understand the approach you're taking itt.
01-13-2019 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
he clearly doesn't want her to win because of his own political ideology. he let her in the contest in the first place because he assumed she would lose, but now that she's winning he wants to change the rules of the competition in the middle of it. what a ****show.
Right, anyone who thinks it’s anything other than this is lol bad at this. He is super triggered that the loud brown lady with the opinions is advancing in his masturbation contest.
01-13-2019 , 08:05 PM
there was no collusion.
01-13-2019 , 08:06 PM
Superdelegates FTW.

I’m on record from early on against any political candidates in ms OOT, but this change is laughable. Just cancel and try it again next year.
01-13-2019 , 08:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
lol you really let your "detached observer" mask slip with this one
Im not a detached observer, Je suis un OOT. What I am trying is to look at it from a more or less neutral point of view, that post was maybe a tad graphic but pretty neutral if you take a look at how OOT is being described throughout that thread. You can say all you want but why would a community, that reacts positively to posts like these:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty Lice
Head on over to OOT and vote for AOC to piss off the MAGA crowd.
Want to be a part of a different community which they literally describe as MAGA's/deplorables/incels/aspies/misogynistic/etc., or was their only goal just to troll the heck out of OOT? You tell me. Even if you're (trying) acting somewhat neutral composed its possible to recognize despicable behavior.

FWIW, I don't put you in the same column as that jman figure, you seem sincere, he is a troll.
01-13-2019 , 08:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
Im not a detached observer, Je suis un OOT. What I am trying is to look at it from a more or less neutral point of view, that post was maybe a tad graphic but pretty neutral if you take a look at how OOT is being described throughout that thread. You can say all you want but why would a community, that reacts positively to posts like these:

Want to be a part of a different community which they literally describe as MAGA's/deplorables/incels/aspies/misogynistic/etc., or was their only goal just to troll the heck out of OOT? You tell me. Even if you're (trying) acting somewhat neutral composed its possible to recognize despicable behavior.

FWIW, I don't put you in the same column as that jman figure, you seem sincere, he is a troll.
"throughout that thread" lol dude there's more going on in the world than this dumb contest. and sure there's some reaction, especially when your guys are going nuts trying to rewrite the rules so an electoral college might stop her from winning.

when members of the russian parliment stood up after the US election to toast to russia's ascension and to congratulate themselves, is that proof of collusion to you? lol no! the two have nothing to do with each other, and you can't prove that there was collusion because you don't have any evidence.
01-13-2019 , 08:24 PM
"despicable behavior" to you: feeling happy that your favorite woman of 2018 might become miss oot 2018 and expressing that happiness with your likeminded friends

"despicable behavior" to me: ignoring the democratic process of miss oot because of overt right-wing political bias

      
m