Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread. Ms. OOT 2018 Discussion thread.

01-13-2019 , 04:30 PM
I mean Howard's posting ITT is a really phenomenal allegory for the history of voting rights in the USA as a whole. 60 years ago he would have been laughing at anyone too poor to pay a poll tax, pretending the poll tax was the real issue and not just a means to an intended end all along.
01-13-2019 , 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
.







Again, as if it's not instantly obvious what's really going on here, while you whine about "good faith"!

!?!? What on earth are you talking about? I haven’t whined about anything other than Doutzen Kroes .... in fact, I complimented jman’s post — genuinely so — and argued for gregorio to be included.
01-13-2019 , 04:35 PM
Lol, the majority of my posts are in oot yet I'm ineligible going forward because I didn't vote for eventual losers?

I participated in the last one the same way I participated in this one. By voting for one candidate until they were eliminated.

Last edited by fuluck414; 01-13-2019 at 04:50 PM.
01-13-2019 , 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
On the other hand, there have been some isolated reports of people trolling the competition (which in the past has been reason to ban voters even who are qualified) or otherwise considering themselves to be in opposition to the ethos of the competition
You mean people calling it a masturbation aid vote and implying that people participating seriously don't know how to google porn on the internet or have regular relationships with women?

Quote:
and there are also a high number of judges lacking experience or recent experience judging - in fact there is so much interest from newbies that it's no longer possible to vet them under the old eligibility system.
I'm confused, are you limiting it people who masturbate to creep photos or those who masturbate to creep photos multiple times a day?


Quote:
So, as we come to the sharp end of the competition, in order to be fair to the 8 ladies who have made it this far,
You mean besides not objectifying them to point that they are just masturbatory fantasies for a bunch of on-line button pushers? What would be fair would be not having the vote at all.

Quote:
voting in the remaining rounds will be restricted to the people who have shown commitment to this year's Ms. OOT
I didn't get the mailer where you asked how many of the candidates you had tried to find nude pictures to masturbate to.

Quote:
by recording at least 4 votes in the competition so far; in other words, there are 232 people who have made the cut as judges for the Elite Eight onwards. Ultimately these are the 232 people who I am running the competition for,
That's just good marketing right there...

Quote:
they are the ones who have done the bulk of the work of sorting the wheat from the chaff to get to this point and it's right that they should get the final say on who wins.

The list of judges will follow in the next post.
You should change the name of the "contest" since it no longer has anything to do with OOT and has become a compulsive masturbators challenge. While you're add it you should change the term from "voting" to "wanking" and add count down timers so people could wank multiple times for their candidates to make it more realistic.
01-13-2019 , 04:44 PM
Nice competition you got going on here, excited to see what rule changes we’ll get for the next round
01-13-2019 , 04:45 PM
This is funny
01-13-2019 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NhlNut
You were never banned from OTT?
like 10 years ago...but only for a little while. so what?
01-13-2019 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuluck414
Lol, the majority of my posts are in oot yet I'm ineligible going forward because I didn't vote for eventual losers?

I participated in the last one the same way I participated in this one. By voting for one candidate until they were eliminated.

Fuluck should also obviously should be in.
01-13-2019 , 04:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
Fuluck should also obviously should be in.
Thanks Mr T.
01-13-2019 , 04:52 PM
Conservative ideas/people are very high on my list of things/people I trully hate, but this invasion from the Politics forum makes me want to order a MAGA cap.
01-13-2019 , 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuluck414
Thanks Mr T.

Any time. You’re a Long-time solid OOT poster.

Your friend,

Howard
01-13-2019 , 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
like 10 years ago...but only for a little while. so what?
I don't recall you receiving your voting rights back
01-13-2019 , 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
Doutzen Kroes isn’t really Doutzen Kroes: she is a metaphor for unlikely and obviously unjust defeats. So she is Mike Tyson and the Red Sox and the Persians at Thermopylae all mixed into one.
Agreed. Imo, her failure to advance was shocking and unjust. I thought you were a fan and would have thought so as well.
01-13-2019 , 05:19 PM
It's pretty hilarious to go back and watch Lektor present himself as the consistent one:

Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
I misread the mood of OOT by suggesting we change the rules from the elimination rounds on (I had in mind something like to qualify you need to be a regular voter from the previous rounds or years), obviously other people posted more when I suggested that, which is why it's not happening.

To be clear, we're still using 2017 ruleset 1 referred to in the 2018 nomination thread:



Rather than 2017 ruleset 2 which existed after gregorio changed the rules mid-competition:
Yeah, what the **** gregorio, how dare you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
The rules aren't changing this year.
hahahahahahahahahahaha
01-13-2019 , 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NhlNut
I don't recall you receiving your voting rights back
lol how would you know?
01-13-2019 , 05:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
I'm an ex-OOT mod, I ran the contest the previous two years, I nominated two of the final 32 contestants and posted the nomination pics for two others (so am responsible for 12.5% of the contestants), and have 250 posts in OOT in the last 3 months. I'm not eligible? lol
if you want to make an omelette without the person whose politics you dislike, you gotta break a few hundred eggs
01-13-2019 , 05:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melkerson
Agreed. Imo, her failure to advance was shocking and unjust. I thought you were a fan and would have thought so as well.

I am absolutely a Kroes fan, but the historical injustices worked upon her are not particularly relevant to this year’s contest and the overwhelming injustice Londo suffered at the hands of imperialist British voters.
01-13-2019 , 05:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I agree, as it would fit with the theme of Lektor arbitrarily changing the contest however he wants, at any given time (twice now!), to stop AOC from winning.
he clearly doesn't want her to win because of his own political ideology. he let her in the contest in the first place because he assumed she would lose, but now that she's winning he wants to change the rules of the competition in the middle of it. what a ****show.
01-13-2019 , 05:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
I am absolutely a Kroes fan, but the historical injustices worked upon her are not particularly relevant to this year’s contest and the overwhelming injustice Londo suffered at the hands of imperialist British voters.
Hottest girl won
01-13-2019 , 05:29 PM
The recent salty tears show that you've made a good decision Lektor, even though I would have prefered dq level tears this solution is much more elegant and fair which shows your heart is in the right place (unlike mine), bravo. Why any effort at all should have been put in to keep people like goof and kerowo around for this contest is beyond me.
01-13-2019 , 05:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
he clearly doesn't want her to win because of his own political ideology. he let her in the contest in the first place because he assumed she would lose, but now that she's winning he wants to change the rules of the competition in the middle of it. what a ****show.
you don't think she's hot, you only like her cuz she wants to soak the rich, what a **** show
01-13-2019 , 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
he clearly doesn't want her to win because of his own political ideology. he let her in the contest in the first place because he assumed she would lose, but now that she's winning he wants to change the rules of the competition in the middle of it. what a ****show.
Lektor was on that "Trump can't possibly win" grind

Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
The main thing that will kill AOC is not going up against Robbie - its that she has a base of 90 eligible voters that isn't going to expand - of which 47 are people from another thread who will soon be bored with their thread being derailed by discussion of a beauty contest.

Not that I care anyway
lol
01-13-2019 , 05:40 PM
This is just going to make the trolling spicier.

The grass roots momentum is real.
01-13-2019 , 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by preki
you don't think she's hot, you only like her cuz she wants to soak the rich, what a **** show
I think she's hot and I want her to soak the rich.

      
m