Nadine

this image won my vote imho

Honestly think there could have been better candidates but on the other hand this makes it so it's pretty close. I'm pretty unfamiliar with both so based just on looks..meh nadine's booty edges out the win I guess.

Wtf does this even mean?

Looks like we're gonna need some investigating here...

Megan's best angle:



dat ass!

I dont understand the logic of person A got naked so we must vote for them. Markle is so sexy and classy. Class and hotness>>> slut and hotness.

Watch Suits and she's even hotter. She's also the hot chick in one of those miller light or bud light commercials.

The logic is we know nadine has a super hot body but we haven't even seen Markle's so we have nothing to go on. So it's airbrushed face/hot body vs cute face/? body. Maybe her stomach or butt is grossly deformed and someone's just waiting to post those pics until after she wins so they can lol at everyone who voted for her.

And Markles photos aren't ****ing 20 years old.

This shouldn't even be close.

In future there should be a limit on how far back in time you can go to find photos of the contestants.





Pamela anderson would win this in her baywatch days. Should she be in this contest??????

lol no she wouldn't wtf

Point still stands

.

Not bad for a tranny.

They're both super hot and the first few times I saw Rachel on Suits I was blown away. And Catalina was the only good thing about Earl after the first season. I just find it unbecoming when people go out of there way to post bad pics in Ms OOT and talk about how ugly they think someone is (unless it invovles cankles).

Negative campaigning may be effective, but it leaves a bad taste in my mouth and makes me want Markle to lose, even though I think she's great in Suits. If you really want to talk about "mannish" faces on men's bodies, instead of pchopping it here, go read the Mr OOT thread.

I lol'd.

(In a "this response is funny" way, not a "this response is stupid" way.)

there seems to be a pretty severe case of booty recognition fail going around ITT

theres no way that:

is a higher waist to datass ratio than that:

obviously pretty much all non obese/totally flat assed girls are going to look good naked or in a thong.

i mean in jeans:



even at an angle i'd say theres a distinct lack of contour in that photo.

lol lighten up, theyre not running for senate here

i just prefer a "you think A's hotter, let me post some really hot pics of B to change your mind"-approach to a "you think A's hotter, let me post some really bad pics of A and photoshop her face on a man to change your mind"-approach. If Markel's so hot, she should be able to win on her own merits, not because you can find more bad pics of her competitor.

And lots of asses look great in a tight skirt that would not be so nice in a thong.

My own campaigning philosophy aligns 100% with gregorio's, but I will admit I'd prefer it if everyone else flung the **** back and forth. It's a lot more entertaining that way.

well... theres not really alot of markle material out there to be honest.

I don't know how you Markle fans did it, but you convinced me to join Team Markle. I was fo sho snap voting Nadine before this thread. The man face campaign along with the "don't vote for people based on old pics" campaign pushed it over the edge though.

Probably going to regret this later, but Markle it is.

yeah pretty hard to counter with better material when she has like 5 pictures on the internet... and 2 of them are screenshots from her show.

Negative campaigning is fine. It's all in the game, yo. What makes me roll my eyes until I pull a retina muscle is when people are like "LOL AT THESE FUGLY GIRLS HAVE YOU SEEN MY FACEBOOK? I BANG MODELS."

crushed the over

we're well within the gimmick account margin of error i assume?

Whoa...I sort of expected Nadine to pull away overnight, but instead it's back within one vote!

The whole "don't post negative photos" thing is pretty silly. Any girl can take a great photo in Maxim; you can't judge them based on their best photo. And it's probably not best to judge them based on their worst photo, since anyone can have bad angles or days when they are sick, etc. It's the average photo that really counts. And Nadine's face looks extremely meh to me in just about every "average" photo.

If I saw Meghan Markle walking down the street, I would turn my head and stare. I can't say the same about Nadine....there are plenty of skinny girl outs there; that alone doesn't make them beautiful.