Kinda interested in what exactly happened. It says she met them at a high school photo shoot, but that she had sex with two once and the other twice. I'm thinking she met the one kid, had sex with him, and told him to bring some friends the next time so she could brag that she "banged the football team" or whatever. Being teenage boys they probably blew their loads in about ten seconds and took off, telling all their friends about what studs they are.

Yea, but I think sex with teenagers is by definition unlawful. Sentence, like it is formulated in the article implies that it is possible to have lawful sex with teenagers.

I don't know what's considered a teenager in Azerbaijan or w/e you're from, but here 18 & 19 are still considered teenagers and can have sex lawfully with 40+ year old chicks and be drafted into war. Whether a teacher can bang her 18+ teenage student lawfully varies by state.

Well considering it's not unlawful to have sex with teenagers starting at 16 in some states that makes no sense.

Apparently ****ed up laws are why certain states seem to try to prosecute teachers having sex with 18 year olds, and I honestly didn't think that was ever illegal until today.

http://www.nj.com/middlesex/index.ss...eacher_ac.html


No surprise Texas it's illegal if the student is any age, but only at high school and any college professor could have sex with the student at the same age.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headline...ts-be-illegal/

The teacher who had sex with the 18-yr-old got off. http://www.nj.com/middlesex/index.ss...leared_of.html

i'd hope so, thats the whole point of sex

Still, a 36-year-old dude banging his 18-year-old soccer student is creepy af. I guess it serves as an example of a person being arrested for lawful sex, Dids.

Arian Foster thinks he could take a wolf 1 on 1. Discuss.

I tend to think he could. Wolves are pack animals. Individually they have a lot of weak spots one could go after.

Vegetarian vs carnivore.

Advantage: carnivore.

I think any healthy, athletic man can take a wolf one on one more often than not, including myself, and the majority of this forum.

I'm probably naive but I don't concern myself over dogs, and I'm the opposite and I'm no tough guy.

Maybe I'm crazy but I'd rather take on a wolf than a gigantic pit bull.

I think he could take a wolf. I don't know about "any healthy, athletic man" mostly because I think too many people go into shock and curl up when their arm is being torn up or something.

I wouldn't count on the wolf just jumping on you, biting, and letting you wrestle it though. It's probably going to try a lot of biting and stepping back and will be very hard to get a hold of. That's the way they attack bigger prey. I have a German Shepherd and in a 50 sq ft room she'd be in trouble if we fought, but in an open field she might bite me a dozen times before I caught her and I'd get exhausted way before she did.

Wolves seem a lot easier to hold on to.

A guy I know has a pit bull mixed with a wolf. According to him it's illegal. It does look pretty tough, though it was whining like a baby.

Yeah dogs seem to be able to harass bears in the open and not get caught. A human is a lot slower than a bear. A

s always it comes down to the details - why is the wolf fighting and not just running away like it normally would? Let's say it's because Arian Foster is menacing the wolfs pups - that's a motivated wolf I wouldn't want to tangle with.

How many 5 yr olds could a 100 lb wolf take on?

I guess if you consider only the maddened animal that has been trained to be a killing machine vs an animal in the wild that might be just as happy running away from a human, but a "typical" pit bull would be 50-60 lbs and a wolf routinely goes north of 100 lbs. I think I would rather take my chances with the modicum of domestication as opposed to a purely wild animal that could be twice as big.

The size is a point, but domestication only usually means less violent. If they are bred for fighting then it's not the right kind of domestication. A guy who works with me lives at his step-father's house where they board fighting roosters. Believe me you'd rather fight a wild bird than one of these domesticated ones.

He must be so proud.

It would depend on how much ammunition I had, and what caliber.

LOL, no.

A wolf is not just a big dog. They can get up to 150 to 180 pounds. Any wild animal is much stronger than a human, pound for pound. Without a weapon you'd have to be Brock Lesnar or Kwai Chang Caine to have much of a chance..

I think the wolf would be just fine as foster lies on the ground with a pulled hamstring

I didn't realize we were cherry-picking the top 0.01% of wolves for our hypothetical contest. Why not just assume an average wolf? Wikipedia says:

The mean body mass of the extant gray wolf is 40 kg (88 lb), with the smallest specimen recorded at 12 kg (26 lb) and the largest at 80 kg (180 lb). Gray wolf weight varies geographically; on average, European wolves may weigh 38.5 kg (85 lb), North American wolves 36 kg (79 lb) and Indian and Arabian wolves 25 kg (55 lb). Females in any given wolf population typically weigh 5–10 lb (2.3–4.5 kg) less than males. Wolves weighing over 54 kg (119 lb) are uncommon, though exceptionally large individuals have been recorded in Alaska, Canada, and the forests of western Russia. The heaviest recorded gray wolf in North America was killed on 70 Mile River in east-central Alaska on July 12, 1939 and weighed 79.4 kg (175 lb).

In a contest between Minimalist and an average wolf I'll take the wolf. What kind of odds can I get?

Pretty great that after we tard up the thread with semantics about sex with teens we can move on to the weight of an average wold.