Quote:
Originally Posted by Case Closed
Henry, pretty meh reply. You've missed the point of everything I said. The articles are much more reflective of reality than what you had in your brain prior to reading them. Look at them plus the other ones I posted. Synthesize the data and try and figure it all out. Hell, maybe even you could do some google work yourself. It's all out there for you.
Every time you post it makes it clearer why you are failing law school. The first article includes the actual reviews. They are available by clicking on the icon next to the case. It is pretty clear you never read them and instead just took what the second article said at face value. I have explained it to you twice that if you actually go read the reviews the claims made in the second article are not supported by what the actual review says. A proper rebuttal to that would be to go look at the reviews and find some where there was actually exculpatory evidence rather than just bad documentation but instead your response is to freak out and stamp you feet and just insist that something that is plainly not the case is.
Quote:
It is always best to not say anything. Always always always always.
There are a few dozen examples in this topic that prove this wrong. There are situations where just shutting up and doing nothing is the best play and there are situations where talking and co-operating is the best play. It is a judgment call that any reasonably intelligent person can make.
Quote:
And again, it's it not about the conviction. If you talk to the cops it is going to be pretty likely that you will say something sutpid. I mean come on Henry, look at your posts. It is pretty obvious you'd implicate yourself in something. They'd lead you right there and you'd implicate yourself in ten minutes. You're kind of a mark. Sorry bro. You need the help of someone who does not have their own head up their ass to walk them through the process.
Except this hasn't happened despite multiple interactions with the police including some that would have some fairly serious consequences. It also assumes that there is something to implicate oneself in -- most people have done nothing wrong. Consenting to a search or answering a few questions when you have done nothing wrong is very different than talking once it is clear that you are a serious suspect -- we after all talking about using discretion and good judgment. Most people are capable of doing that so a universal rule is not the best choice. A universal rules is the best choice if we are talking about guilty people who also happen to not be very bright.
Quote:
Also, lol at you doing research for people. Your friends must be really desperate.
I graduated and got an offer at one of the sisters. I don't work because I don't need to work.