Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
It would have to be a world class stupid dumbass mother ****er to use a place w/ surveillance cameras as an alibi, ffs. Would they think that you are a world class stupid dumbass mother ****er? I'll take my chances w/ the casino system. There've been plenty of ppl sent off to jail from lousy convenience store systems, the casino has to be better.
Hey, I just thought of something! Casino Arizona's stingy poker comp system only pays 87.5 cents/hr on the player's card and that's w/ the food comp included but it's also good for supporting an alibi! I'm going to start using that in some of my jokes.
Yeah, a system that doesn't log you out until after something like 5 hours sounds like a rock solid alibi there, Howard.
If you trip up just once in your answers, the entire focus of the investigation shifts towards you. Something like, "Oh, yeah, it probably was 12:30 and not 1:00 when I left the house." Is enough for them to be willing to probe much deeper, and the more you flap your gums, the deeper you're digging yourself and CAZ cameras and not going to do **** for you.
Just like everyone else with a job, your job security relies on your performance, and an investigator's performance is built around arrests, not convictions. If they arrested you incorrectly and you get off at trial, it's because you beat the system, not that they made a mistake (that's not to say I'm saying that investigators aren't conscientious about finding the correct suspect).
Just look at the Norfolk Four. Even after the guy whose DNA matched AND he confessed AND he confessed he acted alone, the lead investigator still felt his arrests (and the subsequent convictions) were legitimate and that the true killer lied that he acted alone (despite no DNA present of the others).