I know I just wanted people to picture the little brats with muzzles on.
i do everytime i'm on an airplane or at a restaurant/movie near one.
if the enclosed space in question here was a commercial passenger airplane, say a boeing 737, how would that affect the number of 5 year-olds you think you could take? the seats would obviously be a big obstacle (for you and the 5 year-olds).
I agree, I never came into OOT and then one day I had nothing better to do at work and wandered in here and this was the first post I read. Funniest thing ever. I even copy and pasted some of the best responses and sent them to my friends. Now I try and read all the OOT posts, but there's so much crap it's hard, yet I can't stop reading them.
I think that everyone is forgetting the axioms to this problem. Clearly gonores, being locked up in his own statistical knowledge, chose 30 due to it being the minimum number need for a standard bell curve normalized distribution. He knows he can get some extraneously fit/aggressives to compensate for the weaker runts of the group. He has know clue what to consider in his assessment and hasn't given a good evaluation other than a statistical cliche. When you assess the area of combat 30 is too small of number as I bump up the value--for any average American adult (wheter male or female) to at least 60.
Humbling yourself when it comes to the distruction of an inferior opponent/opponents is a disgrace to yourself, puberty, and poker players natural competitive insticts.