Your pic did not link correctly. But if it was a picture of a assless leather chaps....

the answer of course is yes.

URL

So you're saying you can't walk in a circle?

I need to get my avatar poll off the ground, because I am really torn between tecmo and this little tyke with location.

"Snapping Peter Pan Jr's Neck"

or

"You want some of this?"


something...christ I'm stoned.

So you're saying you could take all of them?

Any decent sized male could take on an almost infinite number of 5 yr olds. They could barely hurt you.

Your average 5 yr old, sure.

But these are ill-tempered 5 yr olds. Not to be tarried with.

Plus if you get enough of them in a small space, their screaming could reach a decibel level high enough to cause unconsciousness.

Funny, I always imagined them with muzzles.

if they had to wear muzzles this would be way too easy. everyone could probably double their number.

I know I just wanted people to picture the little brats with muzzles on.

I this thread.

it's everything that's wrong with OOT.

i do everytime i'm on an airplane or at a restaurant/movie near one.

if the enclosed space in question here was a commercial passenger airplane, say a boeing 737, how would that affect the number of 5 year-olds you think you could take? the seats would obviously be a big obstacle (for you and the 5 year-olds).

How many 6 yr olds could you handle?

At what age does the number you can handle drop off significantly?

I'm thinking 8 yrs old.

All of the tactics and strategies being discussed in this thread will be very usefull when the Martians invade.

2+2ers will be the only people left in the world.

- Jason

[censored], there go all the good poker games.

Seriously, can we get this thread stickied?

This should be everyone's intro to OOT.

I agree, I never came into OOT and then one day I had nothing better to do at work and wandered in here and this was the first post I read. Funniest thing ever. I even copy and pasted some of the best responses and sent them to my friends. Now I try and read all the OOT posts, but there's so much crap it's hard, yet I can't stop reading them.
Sticky it.

kevin

I think that everyone is forgetting the axioms to this problem. Clearly gonores, being locked up in his own statistical knowledge, chose 30 due to it being the minimum number need for a standard bell curve normalized distribution. He knows he can get some extraneously fit/aggressives to compensate for the weaker runts of the group. He has know clue what to consider in his assessment and hasn't given a good evaluation other than a statistical cliche. When you assess the area of combat 30 is too small of number as I bump up the value--for any average American adult (wheter male or female) to at least 60.
Humbling yourself when it comes to the distruction of an inferior opponent/opponents is a disgrace to yourself, puberty, and poker players natural competitive insticts.

Huh?

bump because this is betta then whats up there right now.

How many 5 year old could the Texas Tech swim team and that french chick handle?

Or even better, how many 5 year olds would it take to shovel a tunnel through this:



This was on page 5 for me. WTF?

best thread i've ever seen. I could take 40 with ease.

I can't belive this...


...is still alive.

Bump cause the rocket scientist said to.

Having worked with some youths here recently, at my wife's community theatre, I confidently proclaim I could take 30 7 year olds. (Even if they were ill-tempered)