Wrong. Bruce probably couldn't take 2x the ammount of kids we could

Bring it on, motherfu[/b]ckers!!!

I'd be willing to put down a jackson that he could. Too bad no way to test it (poll?).

AK-47 IS THE TOOL! DON'T MAKE ME ACT A MOTHAFUKKIN' FOOL! -Ice Cube of NWA

This thread is one of the best reasons I can think of for the existence of the internet. Good work all.

(just in case the pic doesn't work: Fat Kid

Me VS 1 5 year old I think the 5 year old wins. I am out of shape and drink too much beer!

We are talking about a huge tiger (even for a tiger 800 pounds is huge) and while five year olds are not wild dogs, you are not a tiger. Wild dogs are small and incredibly weak in comparison to a large tiger. In fact, I think most 2+2ers could take a wild dog in hand to hand combat; we outweigh them by a lot, are stronger, and most of us are smarter.

Yet the difference between an 800 pound tiger and a grown human is greater than a grown human and a 5 year old human. I think most of you are underestimating the problem that being vastly outnumbered poses, regardless of the strength of the individuals.

So given this difference, I think you will get an upper bound on the number of 5 year olds a 2+2er can take by figuring out how many unarmed 2+2ers it would take to kill an 800 pound tiger.

I think this number is somewhere between 15 and 40.

A related question would be, how many ants can you take? The answer is not all of them.

Bruce Lee would shred those little tykes, 100 at least - the man could kill a full grown man with one blow

Assume they are rabid.

Psh. These are 5 year olds. This should be reason enough.

Anyone ever play Pikmin (or Pikmin 2)?

Poor turnout due to snow, so there were not enough 5 year olds to pose a threat. I will say this though: 5 year olds are really bad at chess.

Lmao. The real question is, how many 5 year olds would it take to beat Kasparov at chess.

I think the real question is how many five year olds it would take to beat a tiger.

after a thousand or so it collapses from exhaustion and ends up choking to death on an arm or leg.

The correct answer is 1252. Do you see why? I'll let others elaborate.

There is only one way to find out! (Find a really big kindergarden)

That depends?

Am I throwing the 5 yr olds at the tiger? Or am I beating the tiger with them by swinging them from their legs like a baseball bat?

Can I freeze the 5 yr olds first to make them sting more?

quote of the day.

This would be a good topic over at QLC... and if trained right I think it would be hard to take more than 15.

I jusr ordered 65 of these.

Is there a price break when you buy in bulk?

Nope, but hopefully I will be able to return them after they are use.

That is, if the blood stains come out.

will you be wearing this?