Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Flat Earth Fustercluck: The Merge Flat Earth Fustercluck: The Merge

08-25-2017 , 01:07 PM
I also enjoy how the "isn't it obvious that this was designed for us" and "perfectly balanced ecosystem" just handwaves that millions die due to heat/freezing, millions upon millions die of starvation or are malnourished, that humans can't even look at the light source directly without burning their eyes out, etc etc. flawlessly designed!
08-25-2017 , 01:11 PM
99.9% of all species have gone extinct... %perfectlybalanced
08-25-2017 , 01:12 PM
I thought our eyes can't take direct sunlight because we're alien hybrids.
08-25-2017 , 02:33 PM
Quote:
The cost would be in the order of 100s of trillions of dollars a year with no benefit.
What are you talking about? How is this true? You know NASA is funded by taxpayers, right?

Quote:
I don't understand why God couldn't have created a universe that is formed the way observable science says it is. Or didn't.
You can't see curvature in water or land. Only a flat earth is observable. This has been stated many times. You are brainwashed if you think a globe is self evident.

ETA - I think I missed your point. You're saying "outer space doesn't disprove god", right?

It's a fair point. However a globe and an infinite void helps to hide the creator's existence. On an accepted flat earth, atheists would be close to extinct.
08-25-2017 , 02:41 PM
How come when satellites take pictures of the earth it never appears to be flat?
08-25-2017 , 02:44 PM
I don't believe if there is a God he or she exists on the same plane that I do. I'm a meat sack. So I couldn't observe God whether the Earth was flat or round.
08-25-2017 , 04:41 PM
Quote:
How come when satellites take pictures of the earth it never appears to be flat?
You need to level up. Get out of the paradigm. Lurk more, post less.

Quote:
I don't believe if there is a God he or she exists on the same plane that I do. I'm a meat sack. So I couldn't observe God whether the Earth was flat or round.
Definitely. Good post.
08-25-2017 , 07:08 PM
moo-

I'm now leaning that you're less of a troll and more of a zealot. I mean that as a compliment if that matters. It's fine if you want to believe that the end of days are upon us or science exists to obscure some deep truths you hold dear or blind us to the reality of your creator. I'm actually good with you being on board with those things since the rest of the world is largely unaffected by your apocalyptic view.

What my sincere question to you is this: Why not just state your views that science is an abomination to your beliefs and that your creator has fashioned a world that you understand and the overwhelming majority of humankind does not. I mean, it's OK to be the lone voice in the wilderness.

What I don't get is your seeming mission to disprove the obvious by using "evidence" that is anything but. You're miffed that we're unwilling to "learn." I'd have you consider that your lessons are neither insightful, nor are they persuasive.

As an example, consider your tiresome notion that water "cannot curve". You've also admitted that water covers about 71% of the earth's surface. In my view, that's the best evidence that water does, indeed, curve. Gravity is real, the earth is a globe. Water curves and "sticks" to the surface. No YT vid, no hand-waving, no pix of a lake or ocean can obviate that fact. Ships can sail beyond the horizon and there's really not a damn thing you can say or do to disprove that.

But the greater notion is that you believe something fundamental that is at variance to what many of us itt believe. Namely, you think the "end of times" is near, that science is on a mission to subvert your beliefs and that your "creator" isn't being afforded his just due. I'm good with that.

With all due respect, though, I think you should reconsider trying to change the minds of those that understand the world as it exist, those who have made immeasurable contributions to humanity and those who have furthered an understanding of the rich complexity of our universe.

You're the preacher on the sidewalk in Vegas. Few are listening to your message. Those that do, throw a dime into your bucket, shake their head and continue into the casino.

Don't proselytize in OOT; it's unbecoming.
08-25-2017 , 07:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moo buckets
What are you talking about? How is this true? You know NASA is funded by taxpayers, right?
You do know the money that NASA makes would fund maybe 1% of the cost to cover up a round world. And I think I'm being generous with 1%.
08-25-2017 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by leo doc
As an example, consider your tiresome notion that water "cannot curve". You've also admitted that water covers about 71% of the earth's surface. In my view, that's the best evidence that water does, indeed, curve. Gravity is real, the earth is a globe. Water curves and "sticks" to the surface. No YT vid, no hand-waving, no pix of a lake or ocean can obviate that fact. Ships can sail beyond the horizon and there's really not a damn thing you can say or do to disprove that.
Dr. this amount of dogmatic belief is alarming!!
08-25-2017 , 07:48 PM
NASA's budget is around 20 billion. Us gdp is 20 trillion. World gdp is 107 trillion. Obviously the gov is hiding all the money being funneled into NASA to fund this massive coverup.
08-25-2017 , 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidstar-poker
You do know the money that NASA makes would fund maybe 1% of the cost to cover up a round world. And I think I'm being generous with 1%.
It doesnt matter what you think it costs for world control but go ahead and write out an expense report for globe lie cover up.
08-25-2017 , 07:51 PM
I've shown water curve on a micro scale. Is it really hard to believe it can bend on a macro scale? You do realize water is never truly flat on any level but you guys can keep trying to be silly. Do you guys think ice is truly flat? It's probably as flat as Kansas. Shocked you guys haven't brought that dumb stuff up again.
08-25-2017 , 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1BigOT
It doesnt matter what you think it costs for world control but go ahead and write out an expense report for globe lie cover up.
I'll write the expense report. Governments are spending nothing on it, zilch, zero, they aren't even wasting time deleting all the crap you guys create. FEtards are probably spending millions especially if you include the value of their time wasted on videos. Yet they don't spend an actual nickel looking for the truth, just waste time making videos.
08-25-2017 , 07:57 PM
Sorry capone but youve been previously ignored Id had enough.
08-25-2017 , 07:59 PM
Sounds like you got tired of getting run over in arguments. Better get used it.
08-25-2017 , 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minirra
Sounds like you got tired of getting run over in arguments. Better get used it.
Swing! And a miss!

Tally the thread for satisfactory, real, demonstrable proof of globe vs flat earth phenomenon and you'll see the proofs and arguments for FE truth outnumber the globe lie deception!!
08-25-2017 , 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moo buckets
For the people who would like to know "Why Lie?". Check this out (5 min)



I just reread the first page of this topic and it is upsetting. Some thoughts:

"I can see the ISS!"
"Prove gravity is a hoax by jumping off a tall building"

This is the general public's reaction of a flat earth. You can't line up what is REAL vs what you ARE TOLD

It's SADDENING to see that because you see SOMETHING in the sky, you think you know WHAT IT IS because of what you are TOLD

You think things STICKING TO EARTH can only happen because of the THEORY of gravity, which PURPORTS to explain way too many other things that are WRONG.

I want to be sad, but I also can at least remember that our time is one of many. If I'm wrong about end times being near at least it gives me hope that future generations will be able to sort things out.
I actually watched that vid out of curiosity......I honestly expected something more convincing. I weep for any adult that actually watches that and gives it the slightest bit of credence.
08-25-2017 , 08:07 PM
Funny how the globers are supposedly the ones buying into/pushing a massive lie, yet it's the flat earthers that often disable comments on their YT vids and block people making logical arguments.

Think I'm blocked too. Sad.
08-25-2017 , 08:09 PM
On God's green Earth giant women running around left their huge vaginas around for people to take pictures with today is a more plausible realtiy than you nonsense believers imaging we are on some spinning ball in a universe that is incomprehensibly big where an explosion created life. Thems the facts you nerds better deal with it and stop crying about it. Peace!
08-25-2017 , 08:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1BigOT
It doesnt matter what you think it costs for world control but go ahead and write out an expense report for globe lie cover up.
Well there's about 600,000 registered pilots in the USA. Even if it's only 30k a year to keep them quiet, that's 18B by itself. That's pretty much the entire NASA budget gone. With just one profession.

And lol at keeping 600k people quiet for only 30k a year each.
08-25-2017 , 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1BigOT
Sorry capone but youve been previously ignored Id had enough.
I'm so offended that bottom 1% poster who probably can't tie his shoes is ignoring me.

Maybe if you want to try and defend your idea, you should actually understand more than the simpliest ideas. The front line of FE is pretty sad.
08-25-2017 , 09:12 PM
Assuming 600k pilots need to be paid 30k a year to keep flat earth a secret would not pass the GOFAP(Generally Observed Flat Accounting Principles) truth test. Please balance your globe earth debts according to GOFAP rules when submitting.
08-26-2017 , 12:30 AM
Quote:
As an example, consider your tiresome notion that water "cannot curve". You've also admitted that water covers about 71% of the earth's surface. In my view, that's the best evidence that water does, indeed, curve.

As an example, consider your tiresome notion that water "cannot curve". You've also admitted that water covers about 71% of the earth's surface. In my view, that's the best evidence that water does, indeed, curve.

As an example, consider your tiresome notion that water "cannot curve". You've also admitted that water covers about 71% of the earth's surface. In my view, that's the best evidence that water does, indeed, curve.

As an example, consider your tiresome notion that water "cannot curve". You've also admitted that water covers about 71% of the earth's surface. In my view, that's the best evidence that water does, indeed, curve.

As an example, consider your tiresome notion that water "cannot curve". You've also admitted that water covers about 71% of the earth's surface. In my view, that's the best evidence that water does, indeed, curve.

As an example, consider your tiresome notion that water "cannot curve". You've also admitted that water covers about 71% of the earth's surface. In my view, that's the best evidence that water does, indeed, curve.
08-26-2017 , 12:32 AM
Quote:
Maybe if you want to try and defend your idea, you should actually understand more than the simpliest ideas. The front line of FE is pretty sad.
Your side has shown to be incapable of thinking outside the parameters of reality that have been given to you from authority figures and media.

And you can't even see it.

      
m