You'd probably enjoy Walter Veith. The Jesuit wormhole is a good one. Some 33s in here that I might have missed.

I actually wouldn't mind speaking to someone who thought the earth was flat. That would actually be interesting... to try and understand their thought process.

They also probably wouldn't be a POS like Moo.

Apart from all the times water curves, water does not curve!

No comment on the YouTube footage of Antarctica on a commercial flight that you claim doesn’t exist?



It’s time moo. Come on over to team globe. Where the water curves and flight times make sense and bullets hit their mark. And there’s you know...actual evidence like pictures and maths and stuff.

Where do you shop where you can get a space suit? Or a rifle that can shoot 6 miles for that matter?

Since YouTube = empirical evidence, I'm going to drop a small playlist of some videos for moo and other FE supporters to refute.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...vTP_WM43B4ebNq

You mean like this?



Or this?



Or this?



Oh, I think you may have meant this:--

They were talking about the coriolis effect and how long range rifle impacts are affected by the rotation of the earth (ie. prove rotation). They dared you to sit in a spot within range (not over the horizon, read the thread) where the impact point for a rotating globe model would be. If flat earth is correct you'll be off target and not get hit. I, and many other people, would to get into a vacuum chamber with a space suit on. Unfortunately you proposition requires you to get shot.

Curious why you can't use the moon landing as proof earth is a ball...? I don't think anyone here has done that. You'd rather post images of water falling as proof that it can bend on its surface. It's so crazy how upside-down this thread has become. Those defending science do so in the most unscientific ways possible.

That flight is not crossing antarctica. Seeing ice next to water is proof of that. You wouldn't be able to see any water if you were above the supposed continent.

It would be nice to create a poll asking whether or not ships disappearing on the horizon is proof the earth is a ball. If science is based on hard facts, there should be no variations in your answers. 500 years of heliocentric teaching should see to that. You guys can't keep your stories straight which only strengthens FE. You don't even understand the model you are trying to defend.

This thread was not even started by me. It was dropped in my lap and it's my duty to respond to it. If you're replying because you're worried that I might convince some lurkers, you're not helping your case.

The evidence you've provided is actually some of the worst in this thread, with Westley and LeoDoc being your main competitors. No one bothers to correct you because the only posters left in this thread are not interested in truth (or even comedy) at this point. I miss Gregorio's comedic chops as they at least made this thread a good place for a laugh.

Now we are left with people slinging mud and wishing harm on FErs in real life. How unscientific can you get?

Prove that water can curve on its surface, or admit you can't.

Prove that you can create a rainbow indoors without glass, or admit you can't.

Go to outer space, or admit that you can't.

Cross antarctica, or admit that you can't.

What is the harm in that? Do you feel FE arguments are compelling enough that you need to defend the globe, when you already have all of education and media doing it for you?

Show some confidence in your beliefs. Admit that you cannot answer the four globe-busting points I've been repeating so frequently lately. It's got your backs up against the wall and it's bringing out the worst in you all.

You haven't proven this at all. Not even close. It's like you don't even understand the argument.

more misunderstanding of how large earth is. keep at it, tiger.

Hall of Fame level post.

Go to the Giant Ice Wall and Unknowable Beyond, or admit that you can't.

Dig through the bottom of the Earth, or admit that you can't.

Take one of the many freely available commercial flights that are impossible on your flat Earth, or admit that you can't.

Go doink your head on the Heavenly Firmament, or admit that you can't.

Prove that your magical space god exists by having it blink me up a dozen freshly baked chocolate cookies (still warm), or admit that you can't.

I thought you didn't believe in gravity.

Whoever puts any belief into this pic certainly doesn't understand gravity.

Things fall down, not up, because God makes it so, stupid.

How does all that water get to the top of the river though?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But moo you said there was never a commercial flight over antarctica.

Is it your position that Antarctica doesn’t exist?

He deflects. That’s all he does. Brings up some other stupid excuse which is all his sad side has.

God puts it there.

moo, not surprisingly you ignored this post:

Land masses have coasts. And ice packs have edges.

It really boils down to flat earthers not understanding scale.

I posed a question earlier that went unanswered.

How do you draw a curve on a computer screen? A series of very small flat lines at very acute angles to each other. From far away at high resolutions the curve looks smooth, nothing looks flat. But up close, very very close all you can see looks flat for as far as the eye can see.

But start zooming out and eventually you see the curve.

CGI!

FYP

Best.correction.ever