Help me with my House Plans, Part 2:
So, almost two years ago, we had
this discussion where I shared the house plans that our designer had come up with and our frustrations with them. The plans were pretty much ripped apart, notably by zizak and ninetynine99, who both gave some incisive, if hard to hear, feedback/design-trolling. Going way above and beyond, ninetynine99, a talented architecht, even did a
design for us to illustrate how he thought our plan could be a whole lot better.
We still don't have a house. I won't rehash the last two years entirely, but we've mostly been busy enough, content enough with our rental, and frustrated enough with this process that we've only occasionally worked at it. That occasional work has moved us along (though slowly) and we're now to a place where we feel solid about our most recent design. So I'm wondering what you all think again.
We took our then-current plans, along with ninetynine99's sketches, to a local timber-frame company, thinking we'd try something new. They were excited to try to draft something along the lines of ninenine99's awesome plans, but after we priced everything out it just didn't seem like it made sense. The level of custom work required more expense than we can budget for and likely more construction resources than readily exist in our very rural area.
So we designed a house around a timber-frame central square, with timber frame front and back porch features. It comes in at about our square-footage goal (3000, main level and lower-level), and it features a lot of what we want. It's got a loft above the kitchen that we like and feels a lot more organized. What do you all think? Obvious changes? More substantial criticism?
Main Level Plan
Lower Level Plan
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Interior renderings
Interior Renderings