They probably don't realise that buoyancy doesn't exist with gravity either.

fyp

TY!

Seriously go **** yourself you scumbag. Time to stop engaging these super deplorables.

This.

lol

nothing but knee-jerk emotional responses by "team physics"

I admit the moon looks like a sphere, and it does appear the shadows are coming from an object that is much farther away. I don't have a decent FE explanation for the moon. I am still looking at alternative possibilities, but this has been the toughest stumbling block so far.

No one here can call out any other globers even though they are contradicting each other every other post. No one here can prove water curving beyond 1mm. No one here has ever been to "outer space". No one here has ever seen curvature.

LOL

Bigot and moo are fakes and trolls. Both should be ignored.

Sweet cgi!

How obvious is it that NASA is full of ****. NASA = To Deceive. I bet they used to be concerned about all these goofs but seeing as how brainwashed you ******s are it's no surprise that these things don't matter.

Read the thread. Proved already. The curvature of the surface of Lake Ontario is why you can't normally see the lower few hundred feet of the skyscrapers of Toronto from the New York shore. On days when you can, the atmosphere is causing refraction, as on the day when Americans marvelled to see Canada floating in mid-air across the lake.

Buzz Aldrin has, and he expressed himself well on the subject in debate with a jerk called Bart Sibrel.



Plus many people have flown beyond the atmosphere, and robot craft have flown even further, and you can see outer space for yourself any night when it's not too cloudy. There's just no need to be an idiot about it.

Sure have. I was boarding a plane at Paris Charles de Gaulle one evening as the sun set, because curvature. It got quite gloomy, but as we took off and climbed towards the Channel the sun rose again, because curvature. (I was in Club that time and British Airways had given me a quarter-bottle of Laurent-Perrier, which added to the occasion.) Then as we descended into London the sun set in splendour one more time, because curvature.

Vast numbers of people have seen ships appear topworks-first and disappear hull-first over the horizon, because curvature. Curvature is why, in the Chilean Reefer incident in the North Atlantic in March 1941, Vice-Admiral Lutjens on the bridge of the Gneisenau didn't see HMS Rodney coming till she was 15 miles away. Rodney's 16-inch guns could reach 20 miles, so that wasn't good, but Lutjens was fortunate that Rodney was silhouetted against the sunset (a phenomenon that occurs because curvature), while Gneisenau was just a blur in the eastern dark, almost hidden by the glare of the burning hulk of the merchantman Chilean Reefer which Gneisenau had just spent half an hour shooting up. Rodney still spotted the blur and flashed in Morse, 'What ship?' They couldn't have done that sooner, because curvature. Lutjens ordered the reply, 'Emerald,' the name of a British destroyer, to buy time while the outgunned German vessel legged it away east. Rodney's captain chose not to fire and instead moved in to pick up the merchantman's survivors.

The next time Lutjens saw Rodney was in May the same year, when Lutjens was on the bridge of the Bismarck. Again he didn't know Rodney was coming till she was in gun range, because curvature. And this time she did fire, and her terrible silhouette, part masked by the vast explosions from her gun muzzles, was the last thing Lutjens ever did see, because a single one-ton 16-inch missile arriving at Mach 2 blew away Bismarck's forward armament and wiped out the entire bridge crew.

Everyone who has ever served or sailed at sea knows that ships, and land, appear and disappear over the curve of the Earth.

Except that wasn’t their hand but a glove.

https://www.rom.on.ca/en/blog/fits-like-a-space-glove

I love how you guys like to grasp for anything it’s really pathetic.

No, they really are that dumb and they really are that damnable. There are such people out there (American idiots reared in inbred Bible-bashing families, mostly in trailer parks), and these are two of them. You won't find them emitting the slightest sign of any sense of humour at all.

A fuller, unedited take of Col. Dr. Aldrin's second greatest accomplishment, with the good bit repeated at the end:-



All conspiracy theories ultimately derive from the original one, the medieval 'blood libel' against Jews (which arose from a child murder in a small German town), and all conspiracy theorists are the same kind of people who subscribe to that original one. That is why they never take long to drag the name of George Soros into it -- which has already happened in the case of the Las Vegas shooting conspiracy theory, something Bigot subscribes to. And that is why conspiracy theorists, including flat-earthers, deserve the Buzz Aldrin retort.

BTW have hollow-earth believers spoken up in this thread yet?

You globetards think Taylor Swift being a tranny encouraged sleazebag Weinstein even more??

That is what it looks like suckahhh.

No one has provided ANYTHING to prove that GIGANTIC BODIES OF WATER are curving, because THEY CAN'T. THEY DON'T.

SEA LEVEL BRUH

57 on red

So you can see a ship disappear over the curve when it is 15 km in front of you, but can't see a curve on the flat horizon in every direction?

How can you think this way, it makes no sense.

there's a ton of evidence, literally, and you love to ignore all the proof. what level of proof would really be enough? your in complete denial of everything, so it's kind of pointless to actually bring up facts with you.

Me: Water doesn't curve

You: Look at this bubble

Me: That's not the ocean

You: Look at it sticking to the side of this tiny bottle

Me: That's not the ocean

You: Look at it getting squirted out of a fountain

Me: That's not the ocean

You: DON'T REPRODUCE!

It's obvious that you can't prove water curves. I don't know why you can't just admit it. Even Neil Tyson says constantly "the universe is under no obligation to make sense to you" which is just so screwed up coming from a scientist.

I don't know why I bother replying to an obvious troll, but whatever.

There are plenty of (Satanic, obviously) people on Youtube that are testing out what you are saying here with telescopes pointed at the horizon. Why don't you go disprove all those telescope experiments with your own?

You literally said "No one here can prove water curving beyond 1mm." Somebody posted a picture of a bubble that is obviously more than 1mm. You reply with this nonsense. Amazing!