That wasn't my question. What causes things to fall down when not supported, or have weight proportionate to their mass? What is your model's substitute for the fraud that is gravity?

Pretty sure this is their explanation:

https://wiki.tfes.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions

I like that one of their first topics is titled this:

That free health care was an obvious proof that country is fake

Man capone i was rooting for you but you're gonna be on the ignore list soon too. Throughout the thread the concept of upward accelerating earth and flat earth society being a shill organization has been well stated.

Density and buoyancy has been well covered. I am not going to rehash. Read the thread and ask a better question then muh gravity??

Pretty sure Moo quoted that crap verbatim.

People use to be burned at the stake and **** for proclaiming things such as "the world is not flat", "**** doesn't revolve around the earth" and such, due to to not abiding by religious beliefs.

Now those religions are just cool with it, even though the world is obviously flat?

If one of the religious groups could prove the world is flat (easily done), then they would basically be able to proclaim science as bull**** and God is almighty. Millions of people (and trillions of dollars) would come flocking back to the church.

Seems like a good idea for the church to me.

Having driven around Australia a lot. I can tell you it takes longer to drive from Brisbane to Melbourne, than from Melbourne to Adelaide (about twice as long). But on your map, it's the same distance. Is my car in on the round globe conspiracy?

Bigot,

There's thousands of posts in the thread, and I searched for yours that referenced gravity and read a dozen about the water ball which is of no internet to me. Similarly I'm not saying you believe in the constantly accelerating earth. Sorry I don't have a perfect memory of all the nonsense and which is yours vs moos from the thread. If you're going to engage in the thread it seems stupid and disingenuous to just go "read the thread hurrrr" when someone asks an honest question.

fidstar, the southern hemisphere is a deception. North American shut-ins like Bigot can't afford to visit, so it doesn't actually exist.

This thread had some of the dumbest things written in modern times posted already and then these two post come and take the cake.


Just stop Bigot. It's more potful than embarrassing now, watching you try to be condescending.

Did you miss the posts where I said we don't have our own map and that sizes can be skewered? That means that one like this is an approximation.

Do you understand the concepts of density and buoyancy? Do you realize all of the atmospheric pressure around you? If you understand these concepts then you don't need an additional explanation for why things fall. It should be completely apparent even if you do believe in gravity that the primary action on an object will be from density and buoyancy. If there is something refined you'd like me to explain I'll share what I think.

This thread is also about Satan. If flat earth ensures a God then perhaps there is a Deceiver as well. Or perhaps it is because powerful crime families & organizations want to keep people ignorant.

What are the properties of density and buoyancy that make things rise and fall?

So who created the whole round world thing. These powerful crime families & organizations?

So the earth is Flat and the alien came from the edge of the south pole?am I correct?

Components of the "simple model":

1) no maps made
2) sun is a energy transformer from another dimension, located "few thousand" from earth
3) firmament is concrete-esque substance, unknown distance above earth
4) Antarctica wall has "some stuff" beyond it, no one knows what despite rampant Antarctic tourism

Amazing how much more industrious round earthers are than flat earthers. Round earthers are faking flights daily, faking space program, faking scientific experiments, faking the aviation industry, faking Google Earth, faking GPS, faking globes and you lazy mouth breathers in FE haven't gotten to a ****ing MAP yet?

What? Cartography is not only hard it's a made up art to convince the sheeple of a round earth on a flat map - even before most people believed the earth was round.

I totally guarantee that I understand the concepts of density and buoyancy better than you do. I also make a similar promise about atmospheric pressure.

Some questions I guess since you would prefer to do this as a teeth pulling exercise rather than no. But first, let me just out of hand reject this "statement":

"It should be completely apparent even if you do believe in gravity that the primary action on an object will be from density and buoyancy."

Note that I am rejecting that statement because it's jibber jabber. It is literally meaningless. "Primary action" is not a term that has a definition that is either commonly or uncommonly accepted.

1. Why do objects all fall with the same acceleration in a vacuum regardless of mass or weight?

2. What causes atmospheric pressure?

3. Using buoyancy, explain why an object when released accelerates downward.

4. If buoyancy is the be all and end all you portray, why can I put a very dense object on a less dense table without the object falling through the table?

5. If I release a very durable weather balloon filled with an incredibly non-dense material, what happens to it?

Your questions are too good. You will go on his ignore list now!

I went on of those trips last summer, if you go, watch out for the genetically modified penguins like someone said earlier itt, they pretty much run the show down there.

Also, there's no map if you've ever seen Pirates of the Caribbean the 3rd one, you navigate that way, maps as you know them would actually take you in the wrong direction.

Simple me doesn't understand what you're proposing. What kind of energy is the sun transforming? Tell about this "higher dimension."

This doesn't give you pause?

Is there any thing that you could do that would convince you the earth is round?

If you were to be able to hop on one of them transcon flights we've talked about so many times, would you trust your starting point, destination, and a simple hand-held compass enough to convince you that the pilot/airline/Illuminati wasn't routing you in a big ol' squiggle pattern and instead was pretty much going in a straight line?

We could take him to space and he'd probably be convinced it's cgi, worse the moon or mars.