Isn't it weird that the magic dark sun floats in front of the moon/sun at exactly the same time that the round earth predicts they line up.

Maybe he is only talking about what causes eclipses on the moon, so maybe this one should have said "moon".

Are we on a huge ball flying through vacuum at 66.667 mph?

No.

Nice troll gimmick account bro..

At least there is 'some' doubt with Moo and Bigot.

Try harder

Not gonna like, it kinda makes sense...

You've obviously never heard of big dino.

sorry bro, no gimmick here.. I am also straight edge currently (building up discipline so I can enjoy good stuff responsibly when I start chilling again), sleeping on the floor most of the time, believe in karma because I had a glimpse multiple times (in altered states of mind) in its mechanism and it is there I can tell you.. Yea, so no gimmick here good sir..

Nice misrepresentation of the model broski.. and dinosauruses never existed.. they are fiction planted to make 5.000.000.000. year earth more believable. No real bones anywhere for you to see, only plastic made in china. Wake up son.

Apparently not.

First image: Being as charitable as possible, you might be left with two explanations that are both consistent with the measurements provided, but deciding that one is the explanation for no given reason would be a fallacy of personal incredulity.
Second image is a strawman fallacy (where has it been argued that the distance of the sun is based on light shining an infinite distance?) and a non-sequitur (it does not follow that because the inverse-square law applies to the intensity of light, that therefore the Sun is not x distance away).
Third image was already discussed.
Fourth image is basically a repeat of the first.


You seemed to have skipped over my question, and I've spent all this time responding to you! That's a little unfair

Beacoup
You havent adequately addressed any of the 4 images I posted which is fine. I'm not going to place an X on your diagram. Im not entirely sure how far away the Sun is when it disappears beyond the horizon. I would guess 2-3k miles.

BigOT,

What are you basing that on?

San Diego is 3,000 miles from Boston. So at noon (sun directly overhead) in San Diego, it must be sunset in Boston, yes?

Honolulu is 5,465 miles from Boston. And yet, somehow the sun is visible in both locations for multiple hours.

Also, Santiago, Chile is 5,211 miles from Boston. The sun is visible in basically the same direction for the same amount of time in both cities. Explain.

Really great talk covering how the globe is impossible and all the probabilities of what our true cosmology could be.

[x] lolled

I'd be happy to hear your concerns. For example "Try using words to explain the thought process in your head that lead you to such a conclusion. Be detailed."

In my diagram, I placed the observer 9k miles from the Sun, at least three times further than your proposed distance. From there, the Sun is being viewed with the shallowest possible angle, and it is still close to twenty degrees from horizontal.

At your proposed distance, 3k miles from the observer, the angle is even steeper, 45 degrees.

Perhaps you should think about the honest approach, and admit that there is nowhere to put an x on this diagram that would make the Sun appear to touch the horizon. Taking this honest approach does not force you to immediately accept a globe Earth, but it should make an honest person accept that the measurements you are working with are very wrong.

It's pointless discussing distances with someone who changes from 'a few miles up' to 'maybe 3000 miles' without flinching.

Logic, maths and observation are just out the window

Flat and round earthers,

The question will finally be answered soon! gf.me/u/c3xw3w

bob is a fake flat earther. he's as legit as the flat earth society.

Most of the vids I posted early in this thread are inaccessible now. Russianvids vanished out of nowhere and hasn't been heard from since mid July. Only one of his backup channels is still online and it has very little content.

Now most of the FE channels have been exposed as controlled, associating with BOB or the Infinite Plane theory. Pretty weak but whatever. That's damage control for you. The people who have been putting this out have very sinister motives.

Anything about FE in mainstream is bad news...

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/25/us/b-o...rnd/index.html

There you go. 2nd paragraph the article debunks itself. At least you guys have read this thread long enough to know that "outer space" is a hoax only necessary to support the ball earth theory.

It's misrepresentation and you all know it. Why would CNN have to do this? Why would BOB say something like this?

Because he is a fake. Just like CNN, and the rest of the mainstream media.

It's all crap. You don't need this stuff to live a happy and productive life.

Kill your TV

Moo ,

Glad you didn't fall off the edge.

space only needs to be fake to make your conclusion if a FE possible.

Please answer this.. If all evidence against you is fake, all arguments that get debunked fake and all FE'rs who change their mind sell-outs/shills/fakes..

What exactly could convince you you're wrong exactly?

lol...

no one believed or even conceived in the notion of 'outer space' until the satanic globe deception was crammed down the world's throat. It took centuries to get to where it is today.

I think it has been put out again as an experiment to see how the public reacts to it. If enough people laugh it off, it gives a green light to the powers that should not be. Fake alien invasion is my best guess.

What could convince me I'm wrong?

READ THE THREAD

Read the thread?

Really? That's your response?

I have... next?

Then try some memory games on lumosity or whatever it's called. I already answered that question.

No need to change the subject. Why do you think CNN and BOB would include outer space in the flat earth reality? You've spoken to actual people in this thread who have said that space is a hoax. This doesn't add up.

Explain.

For anyone else who has skimmed the thread, this is worth reposting