fyp

Doc they think nuclear power is real and not dangerous at all but bombs are fake.

So I just realized why he needs to believe nuclear weapons are fake: ICBM flight paths.

I still want to know why my flight from Chicago to Beijing flew over so much ice/snow. It was just supposed to be a straight line across the ocean.

The ice/snow was just CGI.

Yeah, this is so weird (compared to the rest?).

Some how so much power can be generated from something so small, but there's no way that could possibly be dangerous.

Nah, the firmament is at least 4000 miles high because the sun is 4000 miles away. ICBMs don't even reach 1000 miles altitude.

They might not ricochet off the dome, but calculating flight trajectories and transit times is gonna be a ***** without accounting for the earth's curvature.

For real? Great flat earth example. You flew over N. Pole to get to China since that's direct path.

Routinely said there is no atom splitting. Nuclear power is not what you think it is. Radioactive material can get hot, tons and tons of hot material could feasibly boil some water. Thinking nuclear reactors are some place where they're splitting the atom for energy is ridiculous and no flat earth - no nukes holds that position.

The math doesn't work very well in your horrible explanation of what you think nuclear power is (the mass/energy balances would be way off based on your simplistic example of what it is). Also for radioactive material, which you didn't seem to believe in to exist in previous posts; would be quite harmful to humans under your definition.

So let me understand this, these radioactive materials which create tremendous heat for some reason would stick around naturally until they are in a reactor and for some reason would give off tremendous heat in that case but not in it's natural state. It doesn't make any sense at all. You aren't boiling some water, your boiling a ton of water in comparison to the amount of fuel you're using.

Why do you continually think bull **** handwaving and horrible excuses are going to fly here?

Also can you explain how the sun works if it isn't a nuclear fusion reactor? When do you expect it to go away if it's insanely small?

I assure you that the difficulties in understanding lie solely in your inability to grasp the simple concept of a dump load applied to a massive power grid.

If anything in this backwards world you claim the math works against me? lol. the math of nuclear fission and controlled reactions doesn't work in your favor in the slightest.

Bigot, I'm going to explain something to you in a way you might understand. You're really, really dumb.

With a complete combustion or fission, approx. 8 kWh of heat can be generated from 1 kg of coal, approx. 12 kWh from 1 kg of mineral oil and around 24,000,000 kWh from 1 kg of uranium-235. Related to one kilogram, uranium-235 contains two to three million times the energy equivalent of oil or coal.

https://www.euronuclear.org/info/enc...comparison.htm

I don't think you understand how much energy this is. And how hard it would be to recreate this based on your explanation of nuclear reaction. You would have so much more waste than you would based on the current scientific explanation of nuclear wast.

That's a very nice story of splitting the atom and unleashing tons of energy - doubling & tripling down on it doesn't make it more correct!

Doubling down on stupid doesn't make you more correct. Your explanations have continually been at the kindergarten level and most of the time make absolutely 0 sense. You should just stop, more FEers are dumb but you take the cake; you're making other FEers look really bad. Even if you're theory had something to grasp on, your limited understanding of how it's supposed to work is so bad, it's hilarious. You and Moo are the equivalent of some zoo animals I don't get to see very often so I enjoy watching you dig your own, pathetic graves.

Okay. Keep believing that in every nuclear reactor they're splitting the atom for energy while 93M miles away a gigantic fusion reactor is providing you with light. Sci-fi concepts only invented 100 years ago now taken as obvious built upon the shakiest foundation, not verifiable through experiment, nor even logical.

You cannot detect motion or movement of Earth, and all tests set up to have failed, yet you believe you're moving 500,000,000+ MPH right now. Hey, it's all relative.

So how does the Sun work, buddy? PLEASE EXPLAIN IN YOUR MODEL. Is god powering the sun with his feces?

How are they not verifiable through experimentation? Do you work for a nuclear company or in a nuclear plant? Again, if you cared about proving your points, you would actually try to prove them. I'm pretty sure there are a lot of really smart people in said plants or labs, that could do your experiments and prove once again you and your stupid FEers monkeys are just really, really dumb.

Yes it's hard for us (with our blind eyes) on earth to detect motion, again it doesn't mean we aren't moving at very high speeds.

Do you enjoy living in your simple model where you explain everything with the simple solution?

It's amazing that all the calcs/theories and models that scientists come up with all fit together pretty well but yours continually not only don't make any sense but have no proof.

I would love for you to:

1) Go to the Arctic and video tape and prove for me that the world is flat
2) Jump in "radioactive" waste, in fact eat it to prove it's not harmful
3) I would like you to jump in the fission reactor to prove it's just radioactive materials generating heat--again that aren't dangerous at all
4) I would love for you to go into space (or try to) and to take a look at earth and travel around Earth
5) I would love for you to travel to the Sun and show me that's it's thousands of miles away and not ~93 million

I would love for you to do anything but link me to idiots like yourselves Youtube videos or silly pictures where most of their points are so silly it's again, hilarious you think it proves your point.

Capono simply look at the difficultly science has in attempting to justify the heliocentric model. Things like special relativity, dark matter, etc all have to be made up because the math never balances.
Take a read of this:
https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_pri...ysics/bahcall/
Do you not even understand how flimsy the own model you believe in is?

The sun is a transformer of energy from a higher dimension. Pretty simple to understand, hard to accept if you think it's something 93M miles away.

So please explain to me how transformers of energy work from a higher dimension? Is the sun only thing from a higher dimension. So you're saying scientists throw out stuff you consider crap so you throw out crap you probably can't explain either. I get it now.

Yes not everything in the universe can be explained by one model right now I know that. But the funny thing is you make stuff up and that's fine but if they make stuff up that actually has an explanation and makes more logical sense than your explanation, it's not okay. I get it now.

I was pretty sure bigot discounted, at minimum, fission reactions and felt as though the powers-that-be just maintained that fiction in order to keep their funding and sell vastly overpriced energy to the sheeple.

And there you have it, capone.

Interesting. I'd be keen to watch the youtube on this. You've got some youtube proof, right?

This is GOLD

Just watched the video; guy is making up **** as he goes. Uses whatever and other stuff a lot; it's a very scientific explanation. Sounds more like a crazy person; but I guess I should believe him because he's just rambling off junk.

He says people will go to jail if they don't believe in fission/fusion. He publishes this, pretty sure he isn't in jail for talking about this.