Quote:
Originally Posted by riverboatking
anywhere else to access this? for some reason when I click that link im unable to fast forward.
just click download underneath.
Quote:
Originally Posted by riverboatking
this is what's so scary about stuff like this.
not even a single legitimate accusation much less anything remotely substantiated n ppl are already going to assume it's true and it will become attached to him.
of course, and you're talking to gregorio who has clearly made his mind up on exactly what louis has and hasn't done, and is also majorly butthurt that we're discussing this in here and not a separate topic with the title of '*** LOUIS CK IS A CONFIRMED CREEP ***'.
good, not great article about why this whole gawker thing is a bit of an embarrassment, with intelligent comments for once:
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/2489...ation-victims/
it's not just gawker of course, you have a ton of sites who have reported their allegations as fact, including this example, where actual real-life verifiable harassment is thrown in with the rumoured louis stuff as if it's one and the same:
http://flavorwire.com/519544/the-par...ld-know-better
but yeah, it's hard to read this stuff without somewhat believing it (which is why it's so dangerous), and i'm certainly at the point where i certainly believe 'something' is happening / has happened, though i doubt that is salacious as some of the anonymous comments make out. for example i am having trouble believing that louis has a proclivity for whipping his dick out every time he's in a bar or restaurant.
i am not defending him, if he is doing stuff it should be addressed properly and punished appropriately. but under the current situation there is essentially zero reputable evidence against him, which is why i find this whole gawker approach repugnant. in their initial article from 2 years ago they didn't even name him, they would just display links to it every time they posted a legitimate news piece on him. so dumb.