Quote:
Originally Posted by dalerobk2
Truthsayer,
I'm trying to understand what your agenda is.
A lot of people are giving terrible advice. SGT RJ was what got me interested (her opinion was dead wrong and she should know better), so I followed up.
Quote:
Have you been diagnosed with BPD or some other PD?
No, I'm perfectly sane and normal, at least as far as psychiatry is concerned
Quote:
Have you "cured" someone with BPD or a PD?
Hell no. I've had friends with very similar symptoms/personalities I've helped though, and no, not with e-meters.
No, I'm the very opposite. I view the the narratives and treatments of psychology as pseudoscience and religion on par with Scientology, and most of their practitioners are terrible thinkers who do net harm at significant cost. However, certain things work - CBT for example (and despite what people have said, CBT and its offshoots are the best treatment for BPD), lithium for bipolar control, a handful of anti-psychotics for symptom control, so I'm not 100% against its products. And there are a minority of competent therapists.
Psychiatry pretends they can treat things they can't. The reality is that most mental illnesses are completely untreatable and not at all understood. This is papered over with widely accepted narratives without any scientific support, such as "low serotonin" as causing depression, and antidepressants fixing it. Or that non-CBT therapy can help. These narratives are pure quackery, on par with smoke balls or snake oil or bloodletting. BPD, happily, does have viable treatments. Unfortunately there isn't much research, but the odds are good that treatment is probably significantly above spontaneous remission rates, which it isn't for most things. Overall, I have a view of psychiatry similar to several Harvard psychiatry professors who are strong critics of it, such as
Peter Breggin and
Marcia Engel, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine. History will prove their view correct, without question.
Quote:
Why are you so emotionally vested in this one particular stance of yours? I'm curious.
I dislike seeing people like SGT RJ holding forth authoritatively on topics they have zero understanding of and contradicting published science. It's someone's life. Making categorical untrue statements is harmful, and she's going to be in a position to do a lot of harm.
Anyway, this thread is fun so I'll bow out, there's not much more to say.
Quote:
But I'm pretty sure that's better than most of the horror stories from that site you just posted.
Yeah, it's pretty entertaining. I don't know what the numbers are, but the research seems very at much at odds with what's being said in this thread.
Last edited by Truthsayer; 11-03-2013 at 10:58 AM.