Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
And btw iirc I won the life expectancy bet because you weren't able to post, as a regular on a poker forum, numerical predictions that could have beaten mine. Spectators don't get to win bets like that.
There was no bet there was just you making a prediction based on obviously faulty data and the prediction turned out to be completely wrong LDO, because at the time you were a its just flu bro.
The maps you provide of Muslims and national spread dont even support each other.
You keep taking static snap shots, when dynamic growth is the issue, as is obvious from the calamity you made of interpreting the Princess data, you just cant process information very well to build a hypothesis, you are extremely **** at it.
All those green areas where colours indicating much less case load a month ago. Wonder why areas with the most communal links with India are ahead of the curve?
We see plenty of blue areas that have no significant Muslim density, and would see more if you had not zoomed in the map to purposefully hide them.
Let me show you some data that relates to that dynamic growth which demonstrates the not remotely debatable fact of exponential nationwide growth and the relevant cohorts for that process:
There is absolutely no data or science or factual base to support your position, you are screaming madness into the void. You are being a complete freak and weird dude in a mad rush to blame Muslims.
Bigotry has sent you completely insane.
Areas with high travel interchange with India seeded and broke out first, and yes those areas will have had supporting variables, but now that seeding is nationwide and that is reality that only a freak would dispute.
Last edited by O.A.F.K.1.1; 06-21-2021 at 06:16 AM.