Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticKnight
This graph shows the last Alberta mask mandate as well, and the expected lag in the downtrend that occurs after any mandate is imposed.
I'm not sure what you think this garph is showing, but it isn't showing that masks had any real effect on the decline in cases. Mask mandates were brought in Aug 31 of 2020, cases didn't start declining until late January. If they had any real effect you'd have seen a leveling off or a decline in mid-September.
Same goes for 2021, when the mask mandates came back it was September 8, but the cases didn't start declining until almost six weeks later.
Quote:
What???? The population density of NS is almost 3 times that of Alberta..
Uh dude, Nova Scotia is bigger than Israel, and almost the size of Ireland. It's not a densely populated place. Plus there's only one road in, and that road was pretty much closed for much of the pandemic.
Alberta is also very big and not well populated relative to its size, but bear in mind that a huge portion of this province is virtually uninhabited. Compare the density of NS with the main corridor in the center of AB and it's a very different story.
Quote:
Anyway, this is probably not productive. It is masks, plus lots of things. But based on how COVID is primarily transmitted, it is mostly masks.
If this were true the data would back it up, and it just doesn't. Masks have their place and obviously help make people feel safer but in terms of a practical effect on covid, their effect is negligible. The real effect is seen by the social restrictions and, of course, the vaccines.
Quote:
I agree the provinces have way more differences though. One thing is that Nova Scotians have been way more compliant to any rules and regulations and less opposed when they are enacted. Alberta, as you know, is quite the opposite. The fear to act in Alberta has be a factor in all of this.
This I agree with, but only to an extent. Sure the Alberta bozos are very bozo, but they're also still a small percentage of the overall population. The main difference is that they tend to be clustered together in their areas, and for some reason get a very vocal presence in media and the like.
So, say that like 5% of Alberta's pop are anti vax morons, that's still about half the population of NS. And since the bulk of them live in the same areas where they have their own media and stuff, they can parrot each other's views and make it sound like their viewpoints are more mainstream than they actually are. Plus there's clearly enough of them to overwhelm the hospital system when they all start getting sick, which exacerbates the problem. Meanwhile 5% of NS is still a small enough number of people that they can rightly be characterized as fringe.
This is way more of a problem in the US, obviously, where the fringe moron viewpoints get three hours of serious coverage each night on Fox news.
Quote:
I appreciate and respect your posts and viewpoints..
Same.