Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruperman
Good morning, Sparks.
Ah, and therein lies the hustle, sir. The challenge looks like a ten-to-one shot (or much longer) but in reality at the hands of an expert it is more like six-to-four. The multi-rail aspect actually makes the shot easier.
Best wishes.
Sorry guys, but I gotta throw a turd in the punch bowl here.
It appears that Ruperman is a bit of a hustler himself. Indications are, unfortunately, that he doesn't play pool well, if at all, and I base that on the dollar bill 9-rail trick shot he includes in his book, as well as his response to my questioning it.
I happen to be a pretty decent pool player. Not being much of a trick shot guy, I hadn't seen the 9-rail "dollar bill" shot before. Just from looking at it, it immediately appeared pretty tough. With no research, I queried the Rupe on it, and his response sent up red flags, with his claiming "6 to 4" odds on it for an expert (uh, not 3 to 2?, lol) but more, when he stated that "the multi-rail aspect actually makes it easier." That is a patently false statement, and anyone who has played a bit a pool, would know as much. Obviously multiple rail bank shots
decrease distance control, for several reasons, but suffice it to say, billiard rails don't magically correct and attenuate a ball's speed as it bounces off multiple rails. That's pretty basic. No decent pool player would say that, unless he was assuming his audience wasn't well versed in pool. Well that's not the case here, unfortunately for him.
I texted my buddy earlier, who as a GC III in his garage, and I asked him to try this shot. He's an excellent player. He texted me back after an hour of shooting the shot, "lol, who is saying this is remotely doable with any consistency?" He told me he tried it maybe 100 times, got on the dollar bill once or twice, and close a number of times, but not on it.
Then, I went to do some research and quickly discovered this is a fairly well known trick shot, and is typically used as a tie-breaker in trick shot contests, with the person getting closest to the dollar bill, winning. Of course rarely does anyone actually end up on the dollar bill. Now you can easily find youtube vids of guys making the dollar bill shot, but of course with enough takes, basically any shot under the sun can be posted as a vid - which only shows feasibility, not repeatability.
There's one youtube vid that was the most telling on this particular shot. A trick shot pro describes the shot, then he says in the video "and then you hope." He hits the shot and ends up just off the bill and says, clearly pleased with the result of being close, "that would have won the tiebreaker for sure." So you get the point, the shot is doable but entirely not repeatable with any sort of consistency, and certainly not at "6 to 4." My 10 to 1 estimate is probably pretty close for a pro, on a table he's been practicing on.
And now to the Rube. Your misunderstanding of this dollar bill shot, and your weak attempt to explain away your lack of knowledge, has severely damaged your credibility, in my mind, regarding trick shots. And now, much of what you have said previously is very much in question, including your statement about balls getting "worn," like the yellow 1 ball because it's racked at the apex. Lol, no, that's also totally wrong.
And now I get your writing style! What it lacks in content and insight, you attempt to make up in grotesquely verbose prose. It reads as quite childish frankly.
Sorry bro, you've been exposed as a charlatan.
Cool thread tho.