Quote:
Originally Posted by Very Josie
It's just that I was um, on him like white on rice. Literally and figuratively. I get overly excited. Which some guys would like...I think he liked it but maybe not loved it. Like I said aggressive.
Imma tone that shiat down.
Cliffs:
Josie: We aren't having sex tonight.
Guy: Ok
Josie: Jumps on top of him and does everything but.
Jose,
It seems that you don't see that the problem in this scenario is you. Yesterday you posted itt that you weren't going to have sex, and that you'd told him as much. You then followed that up by saying that you were super horny and that maybe you would.
Then you went over to the guy's house to "Netflix and chill". In the parlance of our times this is a euphemism for have sex. Are you unaware of this euphemism?
Sometime after arrival, but before the games began, you told him in no uncertain terms that you wouldn't be having sex.
After that you proceeded to "do everything but" have sex.
Today you report that you think you're a little much for him, and you're obviously disappointed that sex was not had. Furthermore, your report basically disparages the guy for not making it happen, and you report that you wanted it to happen.
You seem to have wanted the guy to understand that no meant yes in the time of the "no means no" and "me too" movements.
There's no need to tone down you're aggressiveness. Guys like it when chics want to jump they're bones. Guys don't care for it when you put them in a lose lose position. Had he acted when you tried to jump his bones he'd be in a bad spot today if you had remorse. Now he's in a bad spot because he took you at your word and you're disappointed, combined with the fact you think he didn't like you're advances. He liked your advances, he didn't like that you advanced after saying "no you can't".
There's no need to tone your **** down. Just don't say no right before you try to hide the salami.