Quote:
Originally Posted by Equus asinus
On to my questions.
We flew back at night. Obviously Arizona has mountainous terrain, so I wanted to get your opinion on the sanity of VFR night flights in single engine planes over mountain ranges. It was a typical Arizona day, meaning there was no evidence of that thing other people call weather (no haze, no clouds anywhere - so no danger of VFR into IFR). We had flight following and the plane was equipped with GPS that had terrain.
As a side note, I was watching him carefully on the approaches to see if I could notice anything alarming. He maintained his approach speed pretty precisely until round out and kept the ball centered. Anything else to look for in terms of red flags in a private pilot? All in all, the airspace was surprisingly quiet both ways.
My main question is this: In your opinion, is it stupid to do a VFR night flight like that, assuming a reasonably competent pilot?
I enjoyed your TR...nice picture! I'll answer your last question first: night VFR in a single engine plane is not something I'm crazy about, though I've done it plenty of times. A friend of mine who is a retired Vietnam-era C-130 pilot likes to say: "One engine by day, two engines by night, four engines over water." (He was pre-ETOPS.)
I flew a single engine plane to the Bahamas...70 miles of open water between West Palm and Freeport. As soon as I went "feet wet", that engine seemed to go on automatic rough. I was watching those engine instruments like a hawk and imagined all kinds of strange engine noises. You get the same worries when flying at night. Who needs the anxiety?
I remember when I was taking lessons for my Private Pilot license, my instructor discussed how to handle an engine failure at night. First, you trim up the airplane for best glide speed. Then, when getting close to the ground, turn the landing light on. If you don't like what you see, turn it back off. That's about all you can do.
As for your first question (red flags to look for in a private pilot), I think you just want to look for someone who is methodical and seems to operate with an easy self-assurance. Like Charles Emerson Winchester ("Gentlemen. I do one thing at a time. I do it very well. And then I move on.")
Control inputs should be smooth and you shouldn't feel any significant g-forces. Airspeed should not fluctuate more than +/- 10 knots and he should be able to hold a steady altitude within +/- 50'.
The biggest single thing I'd look for is attitude. You want a professional, methodical approach to flying. I'm not saying I was always this way. In my early days, I did some things in airplanes that were not the safest, such as flying down the Potomac River below treetop height, or flying underneath high tension power lines. And it was fun. But I was taking chances that I didn't need to be taking.