Quote:
Originally Posted by pig4bill
Nope, the court would have to make a ruling allowing the DNA evidence. If it's contested, which it will be if he has a trial, and disallowed, everything stemming from his DNA identification would be thrown out. Which is everything. They have no idea who he is without the DNA identification.
If he wants to fight at all, he can gain a lot from a not guilty plea. He can claim insanity, etc.
It was pretty crappy the way his DNA was identified. In California courts, where they LUVVVVV criminals, who knows. The DNA evidence has a good chance of being thrown out.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...genealogy-site
For somebody that has no idea what he is talking about, you sure act like a jerk-off.
There is no chance that the DNA gets thrown out. In order for the evidence to be thrown out, there would have to be an unlawful search and seizure. Getting a DNA profile of a relative from ancestry.com is not a search. Courts have held repeatedly that the government taking garbage put on the curb is absolutely allowed.
I have yet to hear the constitutional protection of getting all evidence thrown out because he was arrested in California, the land of free criminality, but I suppose that it is totally possible.