Amanda Knox IS hot!!!!

Miss OOT 2009 imo

Victim hotter than murderer in every pic ive seen.

So you are saying Meredith Kercher was hotter than Rudy Guede?

http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/MSNBC/C...245a.widec.jpg

...licious my friend!!

I have been reading more about this. There is no doubt to her guilt at all. The forensic evidence is insurmountable. The Knox family employed a pr to proclaim her innocence to the US media. It is disgusting that her family would claim her innocence rather than accept it.
They are responsible for perpetuating the pain the family of the girl their daughter murdered feel. Shame on them they should be prosecuted to.
Anyone is welcome to say what they want. look at the evidence not what the murderers pr has fed you. After reading this stuff I find it disgusting.

Hotter than all three of them convicted of murdering her, yes.

Does anyone know if they will be releasing all the transcripts and evidence from the trial? It would be real interesting to hear exactly what the juror heard.

Do you have a link to the story that describes Amandas association with Rudy?

Re: her alibi (and alibis in general):

I can go see a movie at noon and unless it really moved me, I can forget what it was about and the title by dinner. Add a couple of days and I won't even remember which day I saw the movie. What reason do I have to keep a precise record of where I went, what movie I saw and every movement in between? The details are meaningless to me, so I won't remember them and if I am pressed to recall them, I could see myself contradicting myself right and left, not because I'm lying but because I simply can't remember all the exact details, why would I? It was just a freaking movie for gods sake?

Wait, someone was killed at my house on that day around the time I say I was at the movie?

Now, it's really important I know my every movement on the day in question. The problem is the day I went to the movie I actually did go to the movie, didn''t kill anyone and had no reason to track my every movement.

Probably a bad analogy, but my point is that if Amanda and her boyfriend were'nt involved, had been smoking pot, partying, having sex, etc, it would seem to me that it would be easy to forget all the exact movements and actions they took on that evening and contradict their stories. Of course you would expect someone who is guilty to contradict themselves as well so she could be lying like you said.

One of the many conundrums of this case

The more you read huh? Reading comprehension must not be your thing, Because there is zero credible forensic evidence that Knox did this crime...absolutely zero.

Do you have a link to this local paper (broadsheet?)?

Also, could you elaborate on what you found to be so different about the reporting?

Could you please elaborate on what exactly this evidence is?

While I accept all the claims of potential problems with her statements it should be clearly pointed out that I seriously doubt the Italian police were out to arrest and convict her and Sollecito for murder. With that being said, I would like to point out that more likely than not, police interrogators have plenty of experience with people who cant remember something very clearly. She is not the first murderer or innocent person with bad memory they have dealt with.

So for a cop to go from oh, normal girl who cant remember her alibi to to I'm probably thinking she has a highly suspicious alibi isn't going to be just because she couldn't remember at which minute she was doing what with who. It's going to be due to major inconsistencies that someone should glaringly know, that we don't know. Of course you can question this, but this is the same thing as questioning whether a cop read the radar gun correctly when he caught you for speeding. Unless you have real reason to strongly question the character and capacity of the police work here it's really really hard to say that all the evidence is bunk.

And I'm sure the PR campaign that her family's legal staff has held is doing well in informing you that Italian police actually hate Americans and viciously put words in addition to knives, and other evidence in their posession for the sake of keeping an American in Italy for as many years as possible.

2 years ago Amanda Knox >>>>>>>> trial Amanda Knox. They tried to make her look like a fat quaker to dispel the whole part girl thing. Completely callous of them to disregard our feelings like that.

Pretty sure if I found my roommate murdered in my house today I'd remember where I was and what I did last night. Particularly if I was in the freaking house at the time the murder took place. And yes even if I'd smoked a bunch of hash.

I'm not all fired up about her getting convicted and I get that way sometimes following cases, so for me, it doesn't seem like a heinous conviction.

I will wait for the juror/judges notes before I decide what I think about it overall.

One thing I think people need to remember, and has been mentioned a few times already, is remember where you are getting your news from. People in England might have a different view than you, not because is was a British citizen killed, but because of what they are hearing from their outlets. In America it is obvious there is a slant for people to think this girl is innocent. This was planned and probably succeeded to certain extent.

I'm not going to blame her family for purposely trying to create a PR campaign in their daughter's favor because if she was innocent, it would also probably be a good move to make. As long as they believe their daughter is innocent, it was the right thing to do. Now if they think she is guilty, that's another topic.

LOL. yeah it's funny when people throw out words like "forensic evidence" when then either have no idea what it means, or have no idea whats going on with the case. There is almost ZERO forensic evidence against Amanda Knox and her ex-BF.

Thats just blatantly untrue. Theres evidence, and it seems depending on which popularized media source you got your info from it's either shaky evidence or rock solid evidence.

Weirdly they dont have it on their site. It was more clinical and to the point, ignoring the clothes she was wearing and not delving into the flaws of the Italian court system in order to imply through that there was a miscarriage of justice.

Here are two articles from the same day to compare though:
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/eu...trial.opinion/
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/uk_..._jury_retires/

Here is an AP article from Fox:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,579290,00.html

Also, in my search i found this:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...hool-girl.html

Positively charming person, im sure.

From the same Telegraph article:
and from the earlier AP piece off of Fox:
Ignoring the hilarity of her being like Amelie whilst she has joked about the holocaust to a Jew she just met, how come there are so many different stories about where she was and what she was doing?

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/12/04/italy.knox.trial/

Several American outlets picked up on this.

Ive read that jurors are expected to wear the "fascia tricolore" during the formal parts of trial (as are all representatives of the country on official occasions) and the two who didnt were the exceptions to the rule and not the 6 who did were making some kind of anti American statement.

This is the kind of slanted reporting im talking about.

So you just take this story as the gospel truth huh? Sorry I need more, and even if it is true it's not any kind of evidence she did this murder.

agreed

actually it is. in fact, its integral. its called "opportunity"

wife: hey honey, our daughters on trial for murder, how should we spend our money to help her? I was thinking a lawyer...

husband: damnit woman, don't you know the best way to handle this is to hire a pr firm to spread propaganda in a country where the trial isn't being held?! *smack*

(not sure why that took a domestic abuse turn, but you get my point)

you are horrible. as was pointed out, there is ZERO forensic evidence against her

Huge lol the Americans criticising the Italian judicial system in this thread. No system is perfect but I would much rather face an italian judiciary over an American one for any crime, minor or major.

At least Ms. Knox will not be murdered by the state, so she can count herself fortunate.

I have no reason to disbelieve the story. What, she is cute and therefore cant be an insensitive dick?

Its also not evidence of her guilt, more a hilariously contradictory anecdote amongst the more publicised friends and family who talk about how great she is.

OK, but this isnt the first case where someone was convicted without physical evidence.

Google the phrase, its extremely common and isnt in itself evidence of innocence.

They hired David Marriott to handle PR and founded the Friends of Amanda Knox organisation packed with friends in high places (lawyers etc) who present their side of events to the media.

In other words stop being dumb. This wasnt even hard to find out.