Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
She says the "plug her ears" thing was her imagining if she was at the crime scene and the police took it out of context and turned it into a confession. Of course this was also so she could put Patrick Lumumba at the crime scene. So I guess if you buy that she could be innocent and still try to frame her ex-boss, then it follows that she wasn't really at the crime scene. Maybe?
Right, if you weren't at the crime scene option #1 is omg don't convict me of murder wtfwtf this is exactly where I was, homemade sex tape with date transcribed here ya go. Instead, somehow the mind jumped to: "well, i hate my boss, so he was there too." Add on top of it all the DNA/evidence is tied to people who know Amanda and not her roomate, you should seriously wonder how not implicated she can possibly be. I mean if you're going to question her innocence, why not the boyfriend with the boot print?
How do you get two people that shouldn't know each other, except through one common link, to the same room, without the common link, murder a woman, and then have one of them confidently take a poop in the bathroom? All without the common link involved?
Again, if she hadn't lied about her boss she wouldn't have the critical
sociopathic, condemning, self-indicting character witness that makes it so much easier to believe that an otherwise nice normal looking nice girl could perform such a gruesome murder.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28057560...eports/page/2/
MSN transcript to give more details than wikipedia about case stuff:
One of the reporters says her alibi is she wasn't there, came home, found blood, called boyfriend, neither called police and that was proven.
Last edited by dxu05; 12-05-2009 at 03:18 AM.