I have read a bunch of poker novels recently. Here are my quick ratings 1-10:
Broke by Brandon Adams. 7 (out of 10) Pretty good. A little short. It also just seems like a thinly-veiled auto-biography?
King of a Small World by Rick Bennet. 9 (out of 10). Strong. About a grinder in Philly. I wanted more.
Death on the Flop by Jackie Chance. 5 (out of 10). So so. Readable but a little dopey. Makes some errors about poker hands and calls a DVD a CD repeatedly.
The Prop by Pete Hautman. 8 (out of 10). Good book about a prop player at an Arizona casino and a murder mystery.
Deadman's Poker by James Swain. 7 (out of 10). Ok, but it seemed like the ending was missing or something.
Shut up and Deal by Jesse May. 7 (out of 10). Like Broke, just seems like a thinly veiled autobiography of a player in high stakes games in AC and elsewhere. Into small details and talks about changing his outfits a lot.
The Picasso Flop by Vince Van Patten and Robert Randisi. 8 (out of 10). I liked this one more than I thought I would. A few too many shameless plugs for Hollywood Poker and The World Poker Tour. Sometimes the writing sags, but the general story kept me involved.
Dead Money by Rudy Stegemoeller. 8 (out of 10). Readable and involving. Set at a tournament at a Foxwoods-like casino in New England.
The Rogues' Game by Milton Burton. 9 (our of 10). An artfully written novel set in Texas after WWII. Cool book.
If anyone has any suggestions for other poker novels to check out, I would love to hear them.
Last edited by Ted_Thompson; 01-26-2008 at 06:48 PM.
Here is the poker fiction list from CardChat, whatever that is.
Fiction
Poker Nation by Andy Bellin
Shut Up and Deal by Jesse May
King of a Small World by Rick Bennet
The Prop by Pete Hautman
The Perfect Play, (a novel) by Louise Wener
Broke, a poker novel, by Brandon Adams
The Picasso Flop by Vince Van Patten
A New York Hold'em by William A. Klein
Texas Poker Wisdom by Johnny Hughes
The Cincinnati Kid by Richard Jessup
Out of print but you might find it in your library.
Quote:
On his sixteenth birthday he started running himself ragged trying to figure out why there was a chance for him with cards and why it appealed to him; he made a serious effort to find out and it was not too long, because he really pressed this thing, before he discovered that a betting man with an honest dollar to back his judgement on a subject was equal to anyone, anywhere, any time, and that from time immemorial there had been men who would bet, rich men with poor, smart men with stupid men, black men with white men. The size of a man's bet was not a significant factor, or what he bet on, nor how he bet. It was the idea of a man backing his judgement with something of value and taking the chance of losing. He took his pursuit further and discovered that businessmen were betting on their judgement, and young couples getting married were betting on their judgement, and that a stud game was the same thing, only that it was a very narrow fraternity and did not contribute anything to society, or to the economy, or to the development of a town, or a man, or anything at all, except that it was a way for a man to go, and a way a man might have of making his way. He saw, accurately, that there was not difference between the stud man and the stocks and bonds man, and when he saw that he could dedicate his life to learning stocks and bonds, or real estate, and that it would still be his judgement he would be backing with a bet, he turned back to cards because he had been with cards for so long a time and he had a head start. And then he recognized that he had this truly fine feeling for them.
Johnny, I just finished your book. I liked it. Congrats. It seemed to be sort of in the same category as some of the others: thinly-veiled autobiography. I know the last 40 pages or so jumped off into a whole different sort of thing, but otherwise, it seemed like it fit in that category. I think your writing style is quite smooth and insightful. The book could have used some more copy-editing. There were some typos and so forth (like "quiet" spelled "quite" a few times, and so forth.) Anyway, you seem like an interesting guy.