Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > >

Notices

Books and Publications Discussion and reviews of books, videos, and magazines. Sponsored by TwoPlusTwoStore.com.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-29-2018, 10:13 AM   #501
pucmo
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Finn
Posts: 388
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barilux View Post
Isn't that more valuable?
pucmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2018, 08:08 PM   #502
Matthew Janda
 
Matthew Janda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 890
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barilux View Post
Hello,

I received the book from mail this week, bought on book depository, and the first 2 chapters have the pages all wrong and upside down. I am sending an image as an example. Who should I contact about this? Really unacceptable and shows lack of professionalism, I blame the publisher obviously.
Whoa. Sorry you're having to deal with that.

I'm not sure. I would contact who you purchased it from, or even 2+2 directly.
Matthew Janda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2018, 10:48 PM   #503
Barilux
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 68
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by pucmo View Post
Isn't that more valuable?
Its a limited edition!
Barilux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2018, 11:04 AM   #504
Barilux
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 68
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Angelique (Book Depository)

Mar 30, 08:49 BST
Hi,

So sorry about the defect.

I've ordered a replacement copy of No-Limit Hold \'em for Advanced Players for you. This will be dispatched shortly. Please allow a few days for the items to ship and then 4-8 working days for delivery.

You don’t have to worry about returning the defected copy.

Kind Regards,
Angelique,
Customer Advisor

Problem solved
Barilux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2018, 08:19 AM   #505
O No GTO
newbie
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 18
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Hey Matt part 8 in your book you said we should consider betting small 25-50% pot with AT, AQ and QJ on 6c8hTh Qh bu vs bb. Do you take that line in practice as a default? Do you know if pio or snowie suggests those lines? Thanks much
O No GTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2018, 01:41 PM   #506
Matthew Janda
 
Matthew Janda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 890
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by O No GTO View Post
Hey Matt part 8 in your book you said we should consider betting small 25-50% pot with AT, AQ and QJ on 6c8hTh Qh bu vs bb. Do you take that line in practice as a default? Do you know if pio or snowie suggests those lines? Thanks much
Poker is an extremely part time thing for me at this point, but yes last I was playing (over a year ago) I would take that line as default.

PokerSnowie was consulted very frequently when writing this book, so it was probably recommending a similar bet size at that time. Interestingly, about halfway through writing and editing the book PokerSnowie added in the 25% pot sized bet option, which actually required a lot more work on my part to incorporate it's advice but ultimately made the strategies in the book better.
Matthew Janda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2018, 01:41 PM   #507
Matthew Janda
 
Matthew Janda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 890
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barilux View Post
Angelique (Book Depository)

Mar 30, 08:49 BST
Hi,

So sorry about the defect.

I've ordered a replacement copy of No-Limit Hold \'em for Advanced Players for you. This will be dispatched shortly. Please allow a few days for the items to ship and then 4-8 working days for delivery.

You don’t have to worry about returning the defected copy.

Kind Regards,
Angelique,
Customer Advisor

Problem solved
Awesome, glad to hear it.
Matthew Janda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2018, 05:27 PM   #508
Guurrbb
stranger
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 9
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Does anyone have any idea why a solver recommends on a Kc, 10d, 4d, Qh its better to fold QJs and call QJ of clubs on the turn?
Guurrbb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2018, 03:52 AM   #509
Husker
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Holsten's Diner
Posts: 11,194
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guurrbb View Post
Does anyone have any idea why a solver recommends on a Kc, 10d, 4d, Qh its better to fold QJs and call QJ of clubs on the turn?
Not sure. Possibly because you are blocking some Kx (KcQc and KcJc)
Husker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2018, 01:13 PM   #510
Guurrbb
stranger
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 9
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Husker View Post
Not sure. Possibly because you are blocking some Kx (KcQc and KcJc)
Kc is already on the board so it doesn't matter about blocking that hand!
Guurrbb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2018, 03:31 PM   #511
getmeoffcompletely
adept
 
getmeoffcompletely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,142
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

The answer is basically always because one hand blocks more bluffs than the other. You can verify that by checking what hands villain bluffs the turn. Most likely you'll find that hands containing the Js are bet more often than hands containing the Jc.
getmeoffcompletely is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2018, 10:42 PM   #512
Husker
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Holsten's Diner
Posts: 11,194
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guurrbb View Post
Kc is already on the board so it doesn't matter about blocking that hand!
You misunderstand. I'm saying if we have QcJc we're blocking KcQc and KcJc, i.e.the opponent can't have those hands.
Husker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 07:08 AM   #513
Husker
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Holsten's Diner
Posts: 11,194
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Husker View Post
You misunderstand. I'm saying if we have QcJc we're blocking KcQc and KcJc, i.e.the opponent can't have those hands.
Actually ignore that, I mis-read the board
Husker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 07:35 AM   #514
jysp2005
stranger
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 1
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Hi Matthew! I’m a fan of yours and read both of your books. I’m very satisfied with the contents and please keep doing what you do. Thank you!

I played in a hand recently and I want to know what would you do if you were me.

HERO (SB): AhJd
Villain (BB): 5s4s

Preflop:

4 players limped in, HERO raised to 11BB, Villain called. The rest folded. Pot was 26BB.

Flop:

Ad 5c 4c. The effective stack was about 80BB, HERO jammed TPTK and Villain snapped two pair. Villain held up.

My thought process:

Villain flatted so his range was capped (no AA, KK, QQ etc.) and linear. Given the low SPR, I jammed to deny equity and won bigger pot if he called with worse. Also, took away his positional advantage despite the effect was less significant in this SPR.

I wonder if smaller bets is a more +EV line because it can keep villain’s call range wide and gain value from his even weaker range.

How do you play this hand Matthew? Thank you.
jysp2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 09:35 AM   #515
ArtyMcFly
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
ArtyMcFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Enchantment Under the Sea
Posts: 7,948
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by jysp2005 View Post
4 players limped in
Forgive me for sounding like a troll in response to your first post, but wasn't the subtitle of the book "Emphasis on tough games"?
You didn't ask for my opinion (and I think that hand history would be better placed in the Beginner's Questions forum) but I wouldn't always raise pre, as limpers rarely fold, and the last thing you really want with AJo OOP is to be playing a bloated 6-way pot OOP.
As played, jamming 80bb into a 26bb pot when you shouldn't ever get called by worse seems somewhat sub-optimal. It only makes sense as a value-shove if villain is terrible enough to call with Ax or a random draw. If you want to get all in ASAP, a check-jam might be better, since that would give villain a chance to put money in the pot with air.
ArtyMcFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 02:17 PM   #516
Matthew Janda
 
Matthew Janda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 890
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by jysp2005 View Post
Hi Matthew! I’m a fan of yours and read both of your books. I’m very satisfied with the contents and please keep doing what you do. Thank you!

I played in a hand recently and I want to know what would you do if you were me.

HERO (SB): AhJd
Villain (BB): 5s4s

Preflop:

4 players limped in, HERO raised to 11BB, Villain called. The rest folded. Pot was 26BB.

Flop:

Ad 5c 4c. The effective stack was about 80BB, HERO jammed TPTK and Villain snapped two pair. Villain held up.

My thought process:

Villain flatted so his range was capped (no AA, KK, QQ etc.) and linear. Given the low SPR, I jammed to deny equity and won bigger pot if he called with worse. Also, took away his positional advantage despite the effect was less significant in this SPR.

I wonder if smaller bets is a more +EV line because it can keep villain’s call range wide and gain value from his even weaker range.

How do you play this hand Matthew? Thank you.
I would definitely bet smaller without a very good reason not to. Gives you the potential to make more money from his weak hands as well as (possibly) get away if you're beat.

But it's hard to know the most +EV way to play against bad players/random limpers, as it's so player dependent.
Matthew Janda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 02:20 PM   #517
Matthew Janda
 
Matthew Janda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 890
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guurrbb View Post
Does anyone have any idea why a solver recommends on a Kc, 10d, 4d, Qh its better to fold QJs and call QJ of clubs on the turn?
Agree with the guys below, it must be due to what you're blocking.
Matthew Janda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:11 PM   #518
OMGLillianLee
grinder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 439
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Hi,

Not sure if it's the right place to ask but since it's mentioned in the book but not really exhaustively, I figured I could ask it here. If not I'll post in SS or in the theory forums.

tl;dr : Should I overestimate my opponents ?

(I'm asking this because specifically in the hand examples at the end, "arguing like a politician", a lot of the strongest arguments assume villain is playing well. The TT hand OTB in a FR game blew my mind. I think in a good way.)

Ok here is the deal. In chess when you learn with a teacher, he tells you to never play a move if you know there is a strong counter move, basically never think your opponent won't see it. So, don't underestimate him and always calculate his best replies to every move. And if he makes a mistake, good for you.

If I consider this logic for poker I'm left with 2 choices :
1 - play expecting my opponents will play well. If he does play well, I'll have an edge when I have a range advantage and he'll have an edge when he has a range advantage and we'll roughly break even in the long run. But hopefully he'll make mistakes and I'll make money, sort of "accidentally" but it will be the result of me playing well and him deviating away of a maximally exploitative strategy.

2 - play expecting they'll make mistake : the big advantage of this approach is that I won't fall into their little traps (check top pair on a drawy board to let me bluff them, stuff like that). I also won't get overbluff/underbluff because I'll know the type of mistakes they make in various spots. But the big drawbacks I see are twofold : a) when the field changes (for example moving up), I will not have developped a strong strategy that just works well overall, and I will sort of have to "read the field" again. b) there is a lot of levelling involved in this approach.

Ideally I would just like to do 1), meaning, play good poker and hope they sometimes spazz out buy ins at me. But it really gets into my head when they start doing maniacal things that I can just take super marginal spots and get away with it. I guess I'm sort of afraid to miss out on opportunities to stack off with like 2nd pair because I suspect this guy is check/shoving any hand.

Edit : also it's sometimes particularly hard to assume they play well if they limp UTG or min 3bet and such. I sort of automatically assume they play bad and turn into super tricky mode sort of automatically, sometimes with no consideration of the action anymore. And I think it can be a huge leak but I'm not sure.

Great book by the way, I understood a lot of things about the game and I now have a much clearer idea of how to think about the game. Only drawback is that I now tank forever on every hand not being sure of what to do but I guess it's actually better to keep an open mind about every situation rather than just being in autopilot. I particularly love the "new reasons for betting" a lot more than just value or bets. Ironically I talked to a midstakes pro who studies theory a lot and he doesn't like it, not sure if his mind will change over time.

Last edited by OMGLillianLee; Yesterday at 12:18 PM.
OMGLillianLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:26 PM   #519
6471849653
old hand
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 1,621
Re: No-Limit Hold ’em For Advanced Players by Matthew Janda Reviews and discussion

Humans and bots can be programmed to consider that the opponent is a sucker.
6471849653 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008-2017, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
 
Poker Players - Streaming Live Online