Quote:
Originally Posted by pecal
I have no doubts that probably in other kind of games the rng is ok , but on sng ( double or nothing at least ) , for shure is not .
What? So you're saying that they have a rigged RNG which is only used for DONs, and all they other games use a non-rigged RNG? Do you realise how ridiculous you sound?
If they were going to cheat, they might as well cheat the lot, not just a niche game like DONs, which will only account for a fraction of their traffic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pecal
Other thing that upset me is that : Ipoker made theyr last test on RNG in 2009 . For the christ sake we are in the late of 2013 and they made theyr last test in 2009 .
Is this a joke? How do they keeped theyr license till now?
It's an algorithm, it won't wear out. It's not like checking whether the tyres on your car have gone bald. Nobody has audited Pythagoras' Theorem for about 2,500 years, but it still nails the length of the hypotenuse every time.
If the RNG was successfully generating random numbers at the time of the audit, and if they haven't made any changes to the algorithm since, and the hardware has been maintained in good working order, then it'll still be generating random numbers just fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pecal
i played only 1500 games til now.
That's a pretty small sample, anything could happen. When Stars used to offer DONs, there was a dude who played them who used to manage that many games in a single day. Any decent grinder would easily manage that in less than a week.
If that's the entirety of your sample then it's not really that significant, particularly in a game where the maximum edges are so small. No offence, but it's quite possible you might not even be a winning player, and maybe the early rungood on bwin was the fluke, with your recent bad results making up for your good luck at the start.