Quote:
Originally Posted by 9TripNine
The superior bindings alone on 2+2 books justify at least half that. You can reference old books years later without pages falling out, unlike others.
Many thanks to whomever makes that decision, I appreciate it.
That's odd. I've always found that the 2+2 bindings were the cheapest possible. Several of my old 2+2 books have "cracked", with pages coming out. I've repurchased two of them (both seven stud books). Right now, my "Theory of Poker" is cracked. And furthermore, the 2+2 books were bad before the era of universally bad bindings (e.g, it took years before the chess books started being published with bad bindings).
I think you must have gotten lucky.