Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > >

Notices

Beginners Questions Poker beginner? Ask your (possibly) naive question here and our community will attempt to help you.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2008, 07:19 AM   #1
WCGRider
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
WCGRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So Cute and Fashionable
Posts: 6,742
Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Wont be posting for about 5 weeks, and havent done one of these in a while. So i figured i would put one up for you guys.

Hand Reading, that mysterious beast where a player looks at his opponent in the eyes, and tries to pick up a tell. His left nostril twitched, obviously its a bluff. SNAPCALL. Oh **** he had the nuts, thank god i play online.

But in reality, hand reading is pretty simple. You guys just make it more complicated then it should be. Lets think about how to approach hand reading.

Step 1) Preflop.

In order to play a hand, both you and your opponent have to elect to play the hand preflop. Lets give some examples.

Hand 1

You are a 20/17 TAG, positionally aware, with XX on the button. BB is a 85/12/.2, and is a giant call station. It folds to you on the button, you make it 3 bb, and the big blind calls.

Your rage is probably something like {22-AA, A8+, A2s+, KT+, 89s+} and his range is probably something like {Just about Any two cards}.

But now, lets change things.

You are a 8/5 fullring nit, and the CO is a 15/11 solid TAG regular. You open UTG, and he flats. Everyone else folds.

Your range is probably about {TT+/AK}, and His range is probably about {22-JJ/AK/AQ}. Note how QQ-AA are not in his range for this example, because we would usually expect him to 3 bet these hands preflop.

It is always important to have a good grasp of both YOUR hand range AND your opponents hand range. It helps you understand the sitaution much clearer.

Step 2) The Flop Play.

Play on the Flop tends to be the most deceptive of any of the streets of play, because the stength of ones hand can still change quite radically. However, It is important to note your opponent once again.

For example, when a player with a very high fold to flop bet percentage, and a very low check raise percentage, check raises you, they have a hand the VAST majority of the time. They have a hand, means they probably have 1 pair beat.

IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO REALIZE, THAT PASSIVE CALL STATIONS ONLY HEAT UP WITH VERY STRONG HANDS.

I love AA, you love AA, we all love the pawkety rawkets. But they can get you in more trouble then they are worth if you dont listen to your opponent as your opponent tells you his hand.

Now as opponents get aggressive, it is more important to take draws into account.

For example, lets play a hand with our villain from the first hand.

You open TT from the CO in a six max game, and a 60/12/.3 calls from the BB. The flop comes J65dd, and you bet 3/4 pot. Your opponent time banks, and reraises you pot.

His hand range will generally be {QJ+/45/J4/J5/44/55}

Now lets play the same hand vs a 26/18 lagtard.

His hand range will be the same, but include{67s, 43s, 74s, All types of suited diamonds hands, probably all jacks, possibly some pair + fd hands} Basically, AA all of a sudden is much better. But that is becaue we know he is going to be aggressive and generally attacks pots.

Part 3) Turn and River play

There is a critical thing that way too many people forget about Turn and River play, and I would like to create the "Rider Thereom"

***Note:Primarily at uNL-SSNL***

"In pots with one or more bets, Players have what they are representing on the turn and river the VAST MAJORITY of the time; ESPECIALLY in position".

(Obviously at higher levels, this changes, because people know this. But we are assuming low level of play.)

This doesnt really need many examples. But its really simple. People want to be honest with you on later streets! Hands are normally WA/WB, and the outcome isnt going to change very much. Remember this, and play your hands accordingly.

Its also important to remember, that someones line must be congruent as a whole, and to take into account how prior hands were played. If someone always c/r's flush draws, and the turn completes the flush after they c/c the flop. Then its a scare card for them. Or if they try to represent it, its going to be a bluff. Just take good notes, think about your opponents entirely line, and do your best to piece the puzzle together.

Basically, no one is ever going to check AA on a A974 behind on the turn. And no one is ever just going to keep checking their nut flush through on teh turn and the river. That said, people will also c/f their bad hands way more. Generally speaking, people have what they are saying on later streets.

Some Example Hands

Hand 1: This was played a bit ago but I think its relevent

POKERSTARS GAME #15980476843: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($1/$2) - 2008/03/14 - 19:35:42 (ET)Table 'Mrkos IV'
*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to WCGRider [Ad Kd]
Rich Roach: calls $2
WCGRider: raises $8 to $10
TheBclaw: calls $10
Rich Roach: folds

*** FLOP *** [2h Qc Tc]
WCGRider: bets $18
TheBclaw: calls $18
*** TURN *** [2h Qc Tc] [6d]
WCGRider: checks
TheBclaw: checks
*** RIVER *** [2h Qc Tc 6d] [3d]
WCGRider: checks
TheBclaw: bets $48
WCGRider: calls $48

*** SHOW DOWN ***
TheBclaw: shows [Ac Jc] (high card Ace)
WCGRider: shows [Ad Kd] (high card Ace - King kicker)
WCGRider collected $154 from pot

TheBclaw said, " wow"

On the river as i was getting ready to press fold i was like wait, this make no sense yo. So i really thought about possible hands. Sets? No they would bet the turn, probably even raise the flop. Same goes for top pair. A ten would play like this but would not bet the river, well certainly not for that much anyway. pairs below ten would of checked the river, pairs above ten would of reraised preflop. No hands really have a random 2 in them.

So wahts left? Straight draws, flush draws, and bruffs. Well the turn and river blanked, and he checked the turn, so its really unlikely he has improved. Also 48 looks like a "bigger" bet in that more chips are on the table, so i said to the computer "Well looks like im a fish because i think i am going to call you". Bingo!

Hand 2: Played this yesterday

POKERSTARS GAME #18610477673: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($1/$2) - 2008/07/05 - 20:53:36 (ET)
Table 'Ortrud' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: sparta7 ($119 in chips)
Seat 2: WCG|Rider ($257.30 in chips)
WCG|Rider: posts small blind $1
sparta7: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to WCG|Rider [Ah Ts]
WCG|Rider: raises $4 to $6
sparta7: calls $4
*** FLOP *** [Qd 7s Qh]
sparta7: bets $8
WCG|Rider: calls $8
*** TURN *** [Qd 7s Qh] [3c]
sparta7: bets $22
WCG|Rider: calls $22
*** RIVER *** [Qd 7s Qh 3c] [4c]
sparta7: bets $83 and is all-in
WCG|Rider: calls $83
*** SHOW DOWN ***
sparta7: shows [Th 6h] (a pair of Queens)
WCG|Rider: shows [Ah Ts] (a pair of Queens - Ace kicker)
WCG|Rider collected $237.50 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $238 | Rake $0.50
Board [Qd 7s Qh 3c 4c]
Seat 1: sparta7 (big blind) showed [Th 6h] and lost with a pair of Queens
Seat 2: WCG|Rider (button) (small blind) showed [Ah Ts] and won ($237.50) with a pair of Queens

Basically, What shoves the river? This is the second hand of the match, and we have no history. But by tripple barreling, what is he representing? Basically Qx, or air. If he had some sort of hand that hit a low pair, he would want to get to showdown. When he goes into super spazzy attack mode, its either total air, or a queen. Early in a match im just not giving him credit for a hand.


Anyway, Enough bragging hands =p. Just wanted to post some good examples of Hand Reading. Hope you enjoyed this article.

~Doug
WCGRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 07:47 AM   #2
sputum
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
sputum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Veni, vidi, badi beati
Posts: 6,412
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Unlucky in the challenge. Still think you got a good price, especially in the light of the insane number of hands you can play.
I think any microNL player here should start getting involved in the micro strat forum and this series will help massively in interpreting some of the terser responses often found there. (Do the microNL crowd know about them?)
sputum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 08:31 AM   #3
phydaux
Bottom Feeder
 
phydaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Never trust a smiling troll
Posts: 4,923
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

I do. I assume others do, but if thae don't, well, ol' PT always said it was a sin to smarten up a chump.
phydaux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 08:57 AM   #4
DanziM
centurion
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 119
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Thanks mate, good read
DanziM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 01:21 PM   #5
Lion
banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Notown Motown
Posts: 163
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by WCGRider View Post
You are a 8/5 fullring nit, and the CO is a 15/11 solid TAG regular. You open UTG, and he flats. Everyone else folds.

Your range is probably about {TT+/AK}, and His range is probably about {22-JJ/AK/AQ}.
lolski, If he's a solid regular, why in the world would he call an 8/5 with such a wide range.
Lion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 01:46 PM   #6
Cruzerthebruzer
Pooh-Bah
 
Cruzerthebruzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Booooommm! Nightnight
Posts: 5,622
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Nice read.

And nice brags.
Cruzerthebruzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 01:47 PM   #7
aznbluff
veteran
 
aznbluff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 2,048
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lion View Post
lolski, If he's a solid regular, why in the world would he call an 8/5 with such a wide range.
Range of 22-JJ is purely to set mine, and then AK/AQ isn't really a wide range at all...
aznbluff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 02:02 PM   #8
WCGRider
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
WCGRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So Cute and Fashionable
Posts: 6,742
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lion View Post
lolski, If he's a solid regular, why in the world would he call an 8/5 with such a wide range.
AQ i guess could be a fold, but your kidding about 22-JJ/AK right.
WCGRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 02:05 PM   #9
Maso777
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Maso777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,962
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

WCGRider: this thread was just a level:
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...ad.php?t=10380
Maso777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 03:09 PM   #10
RYANBLAN
grinder
 
RYANBLAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 426
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by WCGRider View Post
You are a 8/5 fullring nit, and the CO is a 15/11 solid TAG regular. You open UTG, and he flats. Everyone else folds.

Your range is probably about {TT+/AK}, and His range is probably about {22-JJ/AK/AQ}. Note how QQ-AA are not in his range for this example, because we would usually expect him to 3 bet these hands preflop.
I think a 15/11 would have a range like 77-JJ for pocket pairs. Would a solid TAG think he could beat a nit with a low pair like 22? Also, I doubt he would bother set mining for such a small pot.
RYANBLAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 03:14 PM   #11
GSykes
Pooh-Bah
 
GSykes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 100% legitamitely legitimate
Posts: 4,896
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by RYANBLAN View Post
I think a 15/11 would have a range like 77-JJ for pocket pairs. Would a solid TAG think he could beat a nit with a low pair like 22? Also, I doubt he would bother set mining for such a small pot.
um set mine?
GSykes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 03:56 PM   #12
Cruzerthebruzer
Pooh-Bah
 
Cruzerthebruzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Booooommm! Nightnight
Posts: 5,622
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by RYANBLAN View Post
I think a 15/11 would have a range like 77-JJ for pocket pairs. Would a solid TAG think he could beat a nit with a low pair like 22? Also, I doubt he would bother set mining for such a small pot.
Anyone can beat anyone in the world of poker with ATC, you make it sound like this nit breaks the laws of probability when he raises. I don't see why he would ever think 'Wow, this guy doesn't play many hands, thus theres no way I can win, even if I hit.'

Also, do you understand set mining? You don't want to pump the pot as high as you can with 22. You want to see a cheap flop against a super nit because the super nit probably has a hand that he doesn't want to lay down, thus creating large implied odds for hitting your set.
Cruzerthebruzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 04:33 PM   #13
RYANBLAN
grinder
 
RYANBLAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 426
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruzerthebruzer View Post
Anyone can beat anyone in the world of poker with ATC, you make it sound like this nit breaks the laws of probability when he raises. I don't see why he would ever think 'Wow, this guy doesn't play many hands, thus theres no way I can win, even if I hit.'

Also, do you understand set mining? You don't want to pump the pot as high as you can with 22. You want to see a cheap flop against a super nit because the super nit probably has a hand that he doesn't want to lay down, thus creating large implied odds for hitting your set.
I'm not suggesting that he can't win or the nit won't make a big raise/all-in on the flop to create the implied odds.

Do you really get paid off enough with sets to make playing low pocket pairs worth it against a single nit?
RYANBLAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 04:46 PM   #14
WorldsUnluckiest
journeyman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 310
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by RYANBLAN View Post
Do you really get paid off enough with sets to make playing low pocket pairs worth it against a single nit?
Just about, yes
some of them are weak players too and you can make them fold easily if you recognize weakness (missed AK, pocket 10's on a board with 2 overcards, etc. nits at 25nl almost always make a large bet if they think they're ahead, but check/bet half pot if they're scared)
WorldsUnluckiest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 05:40 PM   #15
P1zza_Man
banned
 
P1zza_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FOR THAC, DA TITTY MAN
Posts: 3,829
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

hey WCG, are these "Why you suck uNL" committed towards 6-max or FR?
P1zza_Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 09:44 PM   #16
smurg
old hand
 
smurg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: ♫←²²²→♫
Posts: 1,448
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by WCGRider View Post
You open TT from the CO in a six max game, and a 60/12/.3 calls from the BB. The flop comes J65dd, and you bet 3/4 pot. Your opponent time banks, and reraises you pot.

His hand range will generally be {QJ+/45/J4/J5/44/55}
You mean 65/J6/66 ? Since the flop is J65dd
smurg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 01:04 AM   #17
Lego05
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 23,756
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by RYANBLAN View Post
I think a 15/11 would have a range like 77-JJ for pocket pairs. Would a solid TAG think he could beat a nit with a low pair like 22? Also, I doubt he would bother set mining for such a small pot.

22's a pretty damn good hand in most situations vs. a nit cause a nit's range is gonna be pretty strong so they'll pay you off a lot when you hit 222.
Lego05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 10:11 PM   #18
Yojimgari
old hand
 
Yojimgari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,634
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by WCGRider View Post
Hand 1: This was played a bit ago but I think its relevent

POKERSTARS GAME #15980476843: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($1/$2) - 2008/03/14 - 19:35:42 (ET)Table 'Mrkos IV'
*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to WCGRider [Ad Kd]
Rich Roach: calls $2
WCGRider: raises $8 to $10
TheBclaw: calls $10
Rich Roach: folds

*** FLOP *** [2h Qc Tc]
WCGRider: bets $18
TheBclaw: calls $18
*** TURN *** [2h Qc Tc] [6d]
WCGRider: checks
TheBclaw: checks
*** RIVER *** [2h Qc Tc 6d] [3d]
WCGRider: checks
TheBclaw: bets $48
WCGRider: calls $48

*** SHOW DOWN ***
TheBclaw: shows [Ac Jc] (high card Ace)
WCGRider: shows [Ad Kd] (high card Ace - King kicker)
WCGRider collected $154 from pot

TheBclaw said, " wow"

On the river as i was getting ready to press fold i was like wait, this make no sense yo. So i really thought about possible hands. Sets? No they would bet the turn, probably even raise the flop. Same goes for top pair. A ten would play like this but would not bet the river, well certainly not for that much anyway. pairs below ten would of checked the river, pairs above ten would of reraised preflop. No hands really have a random 2 in them.

So wahts left? Straight draws, flush draws, and bruffs. Well the turn and river blanked, and he checked the turn, so its really unlikely he has improved. Also 48 looks like a "bigger" bet in that more chips are on the table, so i said to the computer "Well looks like im a fish because i think i am going to call you". Bingo!
I've been thinking about this hand. Here's my thoughts on what I'd be thinking he could have on the river facing his shove based on what has happened so far...

Royal Straight Flush - Impossible on this board
Straight Flush - Impossible on this board
Four of a kind - Impossible on this board
Full House - Impossible on this board
Flush - Impossible on this board
Straight - Only a 4/5 straight is possible. Those hole cards probably wouldn't have played the hands. If they played they wouldn't have called the flop bet.

Three of a kind(222) - This hand probably would have raised on the flop. This hand wouldn't have checked behind on the turn.
Three of a kind(QQQ) - This hand probably wouldn't have checked behind on the turn. This hand possibly would have raised preflop.
Three of a kind(101010) - This hand probably would have raised on the flop and wouldn't have checked behind on the turn.
Three of a kind(666) - This hand would not have checked behind on the turn.
Three of a kind(333) - I think this hand is unlikely to have called the flop bet.

Two pair(Q10) - Would have bet the turn.
Two pair(Q6) - Would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(Q3) - Possible. But I think this hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(Q2) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(106) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(103) - This hand would have bet the turn I think. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(102) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(63) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(62) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(32) - This hand would have bet the turn I think. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.

One pair(Qx) - Possible. This hand may have bet the turn. But maybe they didn't, to try to keep a small pot.
One pair(10x) - This hand would have bet the turn.
One pair(6x) - This hand would have bet the turn.
One pair(3x) - I don't know if this hand would have bet the river. Also, this hand wouldn't have played unless it has a Queen+ for the other card I think.

High card - This is likely. Maybe the person had two high cards, called a flop raise, called a flop bet even though they didn't hit a card, then checked behind on the turn, then on the river when they are in position, shoved, to try to get their money back. I think this is the most likely hand. Maybe AK, AJ, A10, KJ, K10, or J10. It turns out that the opponent has AJ!

It's often hard to think about all this as the hand is going on, especially if you are multi-tabling and don't have stats on the opponent and don't have the experience to understand these situations. As the hand progresses, the opponents range narrows down. It narrows down more if the opponent is more predictable. The check behind on the turn narrows down his range a lot. Also, many of the possible hands in the analysis wouldn't have even played the hand.

Here are the most probable hands...
Two pair(Q3) - Possible. But I think this hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
One pair(Qx) - Possible. This hand may have bet the turn. But maybe they didn't, to try to keep a small pot.
High card - This is likely. Maybe the person had two high cards, called a flop raise, called a flop bet even though they didn't hit a card, then checked behind on the turn, then on the river when they are in position, shoved, to try to get their money back. I think this is the most likely hand. Maybe AK, AJ, A10, KJ, K10, or J10. It turns out that the opponent has AJ!

WCGRider, what are the percentage chances that you think that the opponent has each of the three possibilities? 5%, 35%, and 60% seem like the chances for me. You believe that it's more likely that the 60% is much higher, please teach me some more about this hand. What do you think of my analysis of this? Thanks, Yojimgari
Yojimgari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 06:00 AM   #19
WCGRider
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
WCGRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So Cute and Fashionable
Posts: 6,742
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yojimgari View Post
I've been thinking about this hand. Here's my thoughts on what I'd be thinking he could have on the river facing his shove based on what has happened so far...

Royal Straight Flush - Impossible on this board
Straight Flush - Impossible on this board
Four of a kind - Impossible on this board
Full House - Impossible on this board
Flush - Impossible on this board
Straight - Only a 4/5 straight is possible. Those hole cards probably wouldn't have played the hands. If they played they wouldn't have called the flop bet.

Three of a kind(222) - This hand probably would have raised on the flop. This hand wouldn't have checked behind on the turn.
Three of a kind(QQQ) - This hand probably wouldn't have checked behind on the turn. This hand possibly would have raised preflop.
Three of a kind(101010) - This hand probably would have raised on the flop and wouldn't have checked behind on the turn.
Three of a kind(666) - This hand would not have checked behind on the turn.
Three of a kind(333) - I think this hand is unlikely to have called the flop bet.

Two pair(Q10) - Would have bet the turn.
Two pair(Q6) - Would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(Q3) - Possible. But I think this hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(Q2) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(106) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(103) - This hand would have bet the turn I think. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(102) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(63) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(62) - This hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
Two pair(32) - This hand would have bet the turn I think. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.

One pair(Qx) - Possible. This hand may have bet the turn. But maybe they didn't, to try to keep a small pot.
One pair(10x) - This hand would have bet the turn.
One pair(6x) - This hand would have bet the turn.
One pair(3x) - I don't know if this hand would have bet the river. Also, this hand wouldn't have played unless it has a Queen+ for the other card I think.

High card - This is likely. Maybe the person had two high cards, called a flop raise, called a flop bet even though they didn't hit a card, then checked behind on the turn, then on the river when they are in position, shoved, to try to get their money back. I think this is the most likely hand. Maybe AK, AJ, A10, KJ, K10, or J10. It turns out that the opponent has AJ!

It's often hard to think about all this as the hand is going on, especially if you are multi-tabling and don't have stats on the opponent and don't have the experience to understand these situations. As the hand progresses, the opponents range narrows down. It narrows down more if the opponent is more predictable. The check behind on the turn narrows down his range a lot. Also, many of the possible hands in the analysis wouldn't have even played the hand.

Here are the most probable hands...
Two pair(Q3) - Possible. But I think this hand would have bet the turn. I don't think this hand would have played anyway.
One pair(Qx) - Possible. This hand may have bet the turn. But maybe they didn't, to try to keep a small pot.
High card - This is likely. Maybe the person had two high cards, called a flop raise, called a flop bet even though they didn't hit a card, then checked behind on the turn, then on the river when they are in position, shoved, to try to get their money back. I think this is the most likely hand. Maybe AK, AJ, A10, KJ, K10, or J10. It turns out that the opponent has AJ!

WCGRider, what are the percentage chances that you think that the opponent has each of the three possibilities? 5%, 35%, and 60% seem like the chances for me. You believe that it's more likely that the 60% is much higher, please teach me some more about this hand. What do you think of my analysis of this? Thanks, Yojimgari
he never has Q3 and Qx bets the turn imo.

But otehrwise good analysis.
WCGRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 06:01 AM   #20
Yojimgari
old hand
 
Yojimgari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,634
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Thanks for the this post series, they are great, and we are all learning from it. Make another thread! Good luck, Yojimgari
Yojimgari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 06:16 AM   #21
Levcon86
newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kildare, Ireland.
Posts: 23
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

I may suck now, but not for long! Nice thread WCG.
Levcon86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 09:33 AM   #22
dumdidum
banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 619
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Two things on hand 1.

(i) Just to understand: knowing what villian's hand is, his river bet is a pure bluff, right? That is to say, that is not partially a value bet. If there's anything villian can beat it's KJs.

(ii) You don't give stack sizes for the hand. But assuming stacks were at least ~100BB deep, why don't you consider villian having 55/77/88? The limp-call pre makes sense. Depending on your image, he might float you on the flop with that hand. If he floats with that hand, he could (often will) bet the turn when checked to. But why is so unlikely that he waits until the river?
dumdidum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 11:45 AM   #23
crazyfool1985
¯\_(°_o)_/¯
 
crazyfool1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: challenge accepted!!
Posts: 5,214
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Nice thread, must search for all the other 'Why you suck....' you have posted.
crazyfool1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 02:04 PM   #24
insomniac86
veteran
 
insomniac86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,093
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by dumdidum View Post

(ii) You don't give stack sizes for the hand. But assuming stacks were at least ~100BB deep, why don't you consider villian having 55/77/88? The limp-call pre makes sense. Depending on your image, he might float you on the flop with that hand. If he floats with that hand, he could (often will) bet the turn when checked to. But why is so unlikely that he waits until the river?
when i first read this post i agreed with you.

but why bet the river when Hero has shown weakness and villain has showdown value? there is just no way i see a small pair betting this river, esp with his stats.

look at it from villain's point of view. what hands would hero raise pre, bet the flop then check turn and river?

marg hands that will c/c that river like AT, weak top pair
a middle pair possibly better than his
nut flush draw
AK
complete air that bluffed the flop then gave up on turn and river


i just dont see how villain can bet the river with a small pair. he would be beat when called, and bluffing with the best hand when hero folds.


great thread btw
insomniac86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 03:48 PM   #25
dumdidum
banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 619
Re: Why you suck at uNL Part Six: Hand Reading

Insomniac, thanks, you convinced me.
dumdidum is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
 
Poker Players - Streaming Live Online