I've merged the 7 (!) different threads you've started this year in this forum, all asking slightly different versions of the same questions. And this is after you started 3 or 4 in Internet Poker - I guess you decided to try a new forum after I gave you a warning there.
You've been given lots of good answers already, and if you have any further questions you've already been linked to the appropriate threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Haven
You're not a special snowflake; please stop creating unneeded threads.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixfour
He'd probably take 55% rakeback at a site that rakes 5% over a site that rakes 2% with no rakeback
Such an important point that he's been told in many different ways yet fails to grasp. Rakeback doesn't matter; net rake does. Low rake with no rakeback can be better than high rake with high rakeback. And taking it a step further, higher net rake can even be better if the site is soft enough. Overall return is the most important factor in terms of player field/rake/rakeback.
Edit to add: I noticed that once I merged your 7 threads together, you had...7 posts in this thread. In future, when you ask questions either in a new thread or an existing one, you might want to consider joining the ensuing conversation. You're not going to get good results by posting questions, and then re-asking them all over again a few days/weeks/months later, rather than following up with posters that have shown a willingness to help you.