Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register

10-19-2020 , 06:07 PM
Hi, here is a beginner who started using Piosolver thesedays.

When I choose flops, I need to choose “weights” as well.
What does it mean exactly?
Quote
10-20-2020 , 03:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keita9320
Hi, here is a beginner who started using Piosolver thesedays.
Walk before you can run
Quote
10-20-2020 , 05:48 AM
Haha
Thank you for your advice
Can you tell me just for info?
I can use it when I become able to run then
Quote
10-20-2020 , 06:45 AM
Sometimes you expect a player to have a holding some frequency of the time but not all time, for example as part of a mixed strategy ATs could be a 3bet 50% of the time and a fold 50% of the time so while you construct a 3bet pot you weigh it at 50%.
Quote
10-20-2020 , 08:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keita9320
Haha
Thank you for your advice
Can you tell me just for info?
I can use it when I become able to run then
I don't use solvers because I don't play at a level where they are needed, and neither do you
Quote
10-20-2020 , 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixfour
I don't use solvers because I don't play at a level where they are needed, and neither do you
+1 to this.

OP, using Piosolver or any other Nash/GTO tool at the micro level will make it very hard for you to win.

To beat micros, you need to exploit your opponents' obvious weaknesses, and focus on playing for fat value, almost never bluffing (for example).

No offense, but you're trying to train for the Olympics before you've learned to walk.

In the micros, your opponents aren't even thinking about what you have. When your strategy has you thinking 3 levels above them, they actually have the advantage.

To crush the micros, learn to identify those players who think top pair is the nuts and always think you're bluffing, and stack them.

Using hyper-advanced concepts versus droolers will just give you brainlock and frustration.
Quote
10-20-2020 , 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DustyRugs
Sometimes you expect a player to have a holding some frequency of the time but not all time, for example as part of a mixed strategy ATs could be a 3bet 50% of the time and a fold 50% of the time so while you construct a 3bet pot you weigh it at 50%.
Thank you so much I understood properly
Quote
10-20-2020 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurn, son of Mogh
+1 to this.

OP, using Piosolver or any other Nash/GTO tool at the micro level will make it very hard for you to win.

To beat micros, you need to exploit your opponents' obvious weaknesses, and focus on playing for fat value, almost never bluffing (for example).

No offense, but you're trying to train for the Olympics before you've learned to walk.

In the micros, your opponents aren't even thinking about what you have. When your strategy has you thinking 3 levels above them, they actually have the advantage.

To crush the micros, learn to identify those players who think top pair is the nuts and always think you're bluffing, and stack them.

Using hyper-advanced concepts versus droolers will just give you brainlock and frustration.
Thank you for your advice
Ive played 10NLz last few months(20,000 hands ish) and got some profit
So that I tried stepping up to 16NLz or 25NLz
But couldnt really win
I thought its time to start using solver...
Quote
10-20-2020 , 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurn, son of Mogh
+1 to this.

OP, using Piosolver or any other Nash/GTO tool at the micro level will make it very hard for you to win.

To beat micros, you need to exploit your opponents' obvious weaknesses, and focus on playing for fat value, almost never bluffing (for example).

No offense, but you're trying to train for the Olympics before you've learned to walk.

In the micros, your opponents aren't even thinking about what you have. When your strategy has you thinking 3 levels above them, they actually have the advantage.

To crush the micros, learn to identify those players who think top pair is the nuts and always think you're bluffing, and stack them.

Using hyper-advanced concepts versus droolers will just give you brainlock and frustration.
Yeah unfortunately that's not how it works anymore. For a while actually.
Try go and battle 50z pool on Stars without any basic GTO knowledge, never bluffing and going for ABC fat value, it'll be ugly, trust me.
A simple tour in the uNL section in this forum will make you realize how even most NL5/10/25 whatever regs are definitely working with solvers and have a thought process that does include "thinking about what you have".
If OP wants to move up from 10z there's absolutely nothing wrong in starting to play around with solvers.
Of course I'm not saying that you're required to be a GTO wizard to beat 25z or whatever (you don't), but your kind of 2005 strat isn't going to cut it anymore.
Quote
10-20-2020 , 10:27 PM
You might not need to put in solver work to beat NL50 but having a solid understanding of equities certainly helps tremendously.

And that’s something you learn by using solvers.
Quote
10-21-2020 , 12:18 AM
Thanks for all
I’ll just try to work out understanding what poker is.
See you in 16NLz
Quote
10-21-2020 , 02:25 AM
Quote:
When I choose flops, I need to choose “weights” as well.
What does it mean exactly?
Since no one has actually answered your question yet:

It sounds like you're trying to run many flops instead of just one flop. The "wieght" adjusts the frequency of individual flops within a subset. The EV in your final aggregate report will be adjusted accordingly.

I would strongly recommend using a pre-wieghted flop subset. Piosolver has many to choose from:

https://www.piosolver.com/blogs/news...the-whole-game
Quote
10-21-2020 , 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurn, son of Mogh
+1 to this.

OP, using Piosolver or any other Nash/GTO tool at the micro level will make it very hard for you to win.

To beat micros, you need to exploit your opponents' obvious weaknesses, and focus on playing for fat value, almost never bluffing (for example).

No offense, but you're trying to train for the Olympics before you've learned to walk.

In the micros, your opponents aren't even thinking about what you have. When your strategy has you thinking 3 levels above them, they actually have the advantage.

To crush the micros, learn to identify those players who think top pair is the nuts and always think you're bluffing, and stack them.

Using hyper-advanced concepts versus droolers will just give you brainlock and frustration.
Thats what nod locking is for.
Quote
10-21-2020 , 09:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tombos21
Since no one has actually answered your question yet:

It sounds like you're trying to run many flops instead of just one flop. The "wieght" adjusts the frequency of individual flops within a subset. The EV in your final aggregate report will be adjusted accordingly.

I would strongly recommend using a pre-wieghted flop subset. Piosolver has many to choose from:

https://www.piosolver.com/blogs/news...the-whole-game
Thank you
Actually Id tried using that 95 flops subset and got this question
Quote

      
m