Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
tournament  help tournament  help

04-09-2018 , 01:40 AM
One Question:

If i have played 1310 tournaments and my roi is 13,9% , is this enough amount of tournaments played to tell if i beat in tournaments or not? Or i would have to play way more because variation ?
tournament  help Quote
04-09-2018 , 11:48 AM
You didn’t say what kind of tournament you play. Below is a table I developed for a book I’m working on that shows the sample size you need for a 9 man Sit-n-Go to be 90% confident you are a winning player.

9-Man SNG.Sample Size for 90% Confidence WR>0 vs. ROI
Weights for  ROI  
ITM Placing Distrib. 10% 15% 20% 30% 40%
Uniform 1-1-1 350 162 92 42 24
Symmetrical 1-2-1 331 149 85 39 22
First Likely 3-2-1 417 189 109 50 29
Third Likely 1-2-3 275 124 70 31 17

So, if you were playing these kinds of tournaments, and finished first, second and third about equally, with a 14% ROI you would need about 200 tournaments to be 90% confident of being a winner.

For an MTT, a much higher number of tournaments would be required because of the higher variance.
tournament  help Quote
04-09-2018 , 02:47 PM
i am playing micro tournaments with large field, lots of bounty builders and some others
tournament  help Quote
04-09-2018 , 03:21 PM
I don't know but playing 1k+ torneys with possitive ROI of +10% can't be something bad
tournament  help Quote
04-17-2018 , 01:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlanetRJ
i am playing micro tournaments with large field, lots of bounty builders and some others
The larger the field, the larger the sample size you need. I'd say 5k games.
tournament  help Quote
04-17-2018 , 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fahrrr
The larger the field, the larger the sample size you need. I'd say 5k games.
Micro donkaments often have way over 5k runners. A sample of 5k games isn't close to enough.
tournament  help Quote
04-17-2018 , 10:32 PM
i think its not enough to know ur real ROI, but 1k games its enough to know ur a winner on thesse stakes IMO.

a lot of ppl go broke before even 500 games
tournament  help Quote
04-19-2018 , 05:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvis
Micro donkaments often have way over 5k runners. A sample of 5k games isn't close to enough.
Depends on where you play. I played about 450 MTTs on Juicy Stakes Poker in 2017 and only the largest had over 100 players, I would say that the average was about 60 players.
tournament  help Quote
04-19-2018 , 06:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poker Clif
Depends on where you play. I played about 450 MTTs on Juicy Stakes Poker in 2017 and only the largest had over 100 players, I would say that the average was about 60 players.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlanetRJ
i am playing micro tournaments with large field, lots of bounty builders and some others
In other words, pokerstars
tournament  help Quote
04-19-2018 , 10:55 AM
If you're talking about field sizes of over 1500 players, you'd actually need a ridiculous sample size (like 80,000 games) to get a "true" picture of your ROI.

I wouldn't stress about it. Just keep playing your game. After a while, you just "know" that you're a long term winner, because you recognise that 90% of the field is making terrible mistakes. If you're not yet at the stage of spotting other players' mistakes, you probably just ran well in a few selected tourneys. (Binking 1 MTT will drag up your overall ROI to a ridiculous degree, even over a "large" sample size).
tournament  help Quote
04-23-2018 , 05:38 PM
in such of short sample all depends on how many big hits u ve taken, lets say u r up 500% but u won a torney of 2k then u prob just go lucky in that occassion, if your profit it s small but continuous you are much more likely to have success in the future games
tournament  help Quote

      
m