OP, if you have a sufficiently high boredom tolerance, one thing you might consider, if it's possible at your casino(s), is starting out as an NL shortstack player. The tl;dr is that if you're allowed to buy in for 30 or 40 big blinds ($60 to $80 at a 1/2nl), the shortstack strategy usually works very well. If they'll force you to buy in for at least 50bb ($100 and 1/2), it doesn't work QUITE as well but still works somewhat well.
Shortstacking is mind-numbingly, soul-crushingly boring. But the big advantage it gives you is if you follow it rote, you will USUALLY be getting your money in with an equity advantage. The other advantage to starting out shortstacking as a beginner is you'll be folding 90% of your hands, so you have plenty of opportunities to just watch the rest of the table - watch the loose-passives, tight-aggressives, weak-tights, balanced crushers etc.
Here is a thread I wrote where I talked about shortstacking:
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/3...05/?highlight=
The other thing to consider is starting out at fixed-limit hold'em instead of no-limit hold'em. As a beginner, you *will* make mistakes. Mistakes at fixed-limit hold'em cost you a few bets. Mistakes at no-limit can cost you your whole stack. It is true that if you later decide to switch to no-limit, you will still make mistakes because they're dramatically different games, but you will make less mistakes with a couple years of FLHE under your belt than you will make as a rote beginner.
Personally, I find FLHE much much much more FUN and it's not even close. YMMV of course - other people find shoveling $150 worth of chips into the pot on a pure bluff and watching the other guy tank, fold, and show a good hand fun. For me that's terrifying
.
If you do decide to try FLHE, the bible is Small Stakes Hold'Em by Miller, Malmuth and Sklansky.
Good luck!