Quote:
Originally Posted by SpewingIsMyMove
Is this game substantially different than any other poker variant, or is it a transparent attempt to create a came, using a different deck so that the game can be copy righted or considered new IP, and try to capitalize on poker's popularity (see the only other threads started by OP)
I see no significant improvements from adding cards to the deck. I see no indication that it makes the game more skill based. I am not even sure why you want a game to be more explicitly skill based. I always thought you wanted people to believe that there was huge amount of luck involved, so that they would play even when they were less experienced than other players.
Quit trying to scam a quick buck by rubbing the serial numbers off of poker and then trying to claim you made a new game.
I usually do not answer to people that are trying to make a bad thing of what i did(in the way you are trying to do). I really believe people will want to play nil poker. There are so many people out there who are seeking for poker with a little more skills involved than regular poker(52-card deck). So, the moves, that they make and all the books that they read about poker will make a bit more sense. I make this poker variant for people. For people and nothing more. There is really a lot of people out there that does want a little more skill-based poker. I know some people who run really, really bad (it is not their fault to run bad; but this is poker so running bad can happened). I think there is a lot of people who considered poker a bit too lucky game.
How can something that is made for some people, be a bad thing? I know a lot of people who will never even consider talking bad(in the way you are trying) about any kind of invention that is good for some people(even if 2 people will want to play it in the whole world), while just talking bad. How do you think all poker rooms are making money?With rake...How do you think this site is making money? With advertising all the poker forms... I do not see how can be a bad thing, if someone make some new poker variant (innovative work; thinking with your own head to make something different) and if people who considered poker a bit too lucky and who are running bad, will want to play this new poker variant. Even if nobody in the whole world does not want to play nil poker, to me it is really not normal that you just want to make some innovative work of any kind a bad thing in the way you do it(i will never even consider talking bad about any innovative work in the way you do it; and i think a lot of people are thinking the same way; i think it is cool that people are making new things in general, otherwise we would be still in caves).
People who want to play poker will not pay a dime more if they play nil poker variant. Nobody is going to pay a dime more if they want to play nil poker(instead of poker(52-card deck)) as a home game or something similar. But the companies that will try to make money on my idea are probably need to pay something(i think this is fair, if they want to make money with something that is innovative; using somebody´s else intelect to make money).
Basically, i see a lot of non-constructive sentences trying to talk bad things about nil poker. I wrote a lot about my opinions on nil poker and i had some constructive feedback which i really appreciate. But if you write something, please read all that has been said allready, as if you do not read it all, it is not constructive opinion and i really can not answer that in the future. Also, i am not planning to answer this type of posts in the future. Anyway, i wish you good luck.