Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Is 10 buy in enough? Is 10 buy in enough?

07-31-2017 , 03:39 PM
Assuming you only limited to play only 1 table at recreational site, and playing TAG

Sent from my ASUS_Z00VD using Tapatalk
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
07-31-2017 , 03:56 PM
The BI 'formula' depends on your goals for poker. Never go into a session saying "I'm going to play like this today" because the table may dictate you play otherwise.

I usually only bring 3 BI to a session, so having some BR in reserve is a good thing. I think we all will baby our 2nd or 3rd BI in a session since 'time' usually dictates our session initially. I still struggle with leaving 'early'. I want to learn to push myself through different types of tables but there are games you really should just walk away from.

I got away from your question. Most common threads here on this site will say you need at least 20BI if your goal is to 'make money' at poker. This will allow you to play the way you 'should' play and ride the wave of variance.

I'm not so sure you can label any online site as 'recreational' but I may be reading into your word 'site'. For my own labeling you will be hard pressed to find a recreational poker room ... It's not like going to the park to shoot some hoops with whoever shows up. You will most likely find 1-4 players per table who are there to WIN and you need to play accordingly. GL
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
07-31-2017 , 04:22 PM
What kind of risk are you willing to take?
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
07-31-2017 , 04:49 PM
Enough to do what?
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
07-31-2017 , 06:37 PM
10 buyins of what? Cash? Donkaments? Donk and goes? You've been here long enough and made enough threads to know not to ask such a vague question

Last edited by sixfour; 07-31-2017 at 06:38 PM. Reason: the answer is 99% no
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
07-31-2017 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixfour
10 buyins of what? Cash? Donkaments? Donk and goes? You've been here long enough and made enough threads to know not to ask such a vague question
10 buy in for a recreational site. Im looking at many players at high stake there buying in 20bb @ 10/20

Is it profit by putting pressure on short stack

Sent from my ASUS_Z00VD using Tapatalk
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
07-31-2017 , 10:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3K_TOM17
10 buy in for a recreational site. Im looking at many players at high stake there buying in 20bb @ 10/20

Is it profit by putting pressure on short stack

Sent from my ASUS_Z00VD using Tapatalk
I'm scared for you, dont do it...
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
08-01-2017 , 08:45 AM
A few years ago, when I played plo10 to plo20, I played with 10 (1000 bb), but I played short stacked (as a start, and left off with a double, or up to like 166 bb, depending on my site roll) in good games with a rakeback. Never came near to bust my site roll, but I did have my 10 (500 bb) up to daily losing streaks.

Since then I have short stacked nlh (20 or 30+ bb starts) (for tourneys practise. I have been playing 50 to 100 bb starting stacks before that already) with about no roll (and didn't bust) and I have had 20 buyings starts for good value tourneys (average field some hundreds, counting out the smaller sites that have small fields, though not sure it makes a difference to variance, as I play also some turbo S&Gs with tens of players and I like having more roll then, although my scores don't agree, and anyone else might vote the big MTTs needing the most roll, more so when they are turbo or faster -- the turbos are often like normal in MTTs), and haven't come close to busting yet (I beat like 55% of the field and counting out one site, haven't made my share of the top 1 to 3 positions, when there are players that have made them up to 3x their share, but they haven't scored better on average, my luck being on making good enough money more than my share).

When the games are easy (and controlled, lower variance perhaps, or big value), the roll needs for a start, or in tourneys even long run, are much smaller than what the tougher games need (you can throw those recommendations out the window).

It is always possible to move up and down accordingly (if it makes sense). It tends to become an issue only when one moves up to some relatively tougher games, and in that case, one makes shots (about no roll needed), more or less mixed with one's usual play (a limit lower), making it pretty painless (well, not psychologically).
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
08-01-2017 , 12:51 PM
can you pm me what site this is?
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
08-01-2017 , 06:00 PM
10 buy-ins for hold'em or baccarat?
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
08-03-2017 , 06:59 AM
I know on global poker they allow short stacking with 10 bb buyins. But I dont know any other site that does.
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote
08-03-2017 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pucmo
A few years ago, when I played plo10 to plo20, I played with 10 (1000 bb), but I played short stacked (as a start, and left off with a double, or up to like 166 bb, depending on my site roll) in good games with a rakeback. Never came near to bust my site roll, but I did have my 10 (500 bb) up to daily losing streaks.

Since then I have short stacked nlh (20 or 30+ bb starts) (for tourneys practise. I have been playing 50 to 100 bb starting stacks before that already) with about no roll (and didn't bust) and I have had 20 buyings starts for good value tourneys (average field some hundreds, counting out the smaller sites that have small fields, though not sure it makes a difference to variance, as I play also some turbo S&Gs with tens of players and I like having more roll then, although my scores don't agree, and anyone else might vote the big MTTs needing the most roll, more so when they are turbo or faster -- the turbos are often like normal in MTTs), and haven't come close to busting yet (I beat like 55% of the field and counting out one site, haven't made my share of the top 1 to 3 positions, when there are players that have made them up to 3x their share, but they haven't scored better on average, my luck being on making good enough money more than my share).

When the games are easy (and controlled, lower variance perhaps, or big value), the roll needs for a start, or in tourneys even long run, are much smaller than what the tougher games need (you can throw those recommendations out the window).

It is always possible to move up and down accordingly (if it makes sense). It tends to become an issue only when one moves up to some relatively tougher games, and in that case, one makes shots (about no roll needed), more or less mixed with one's usual play (a limit lower), making it pretty painless (well, not psychologically).
I lost:
AQhh vs TT with 30bigs shove.
Open AK flop top top met up J2ss btm two
Limp 32o in sb, met btm 2 ran into middle set 3 on btn
Hero bb Q4 top n btm overaggro shove into 55 for a set
Had KK against 9Thh villian had me on turn flushed me I had Kh, river came a straight flush for him
Had AA against flush as well

Etc

I just couldn't help myself but click the bet and then ran into bigger bigger hand.

Update:
Lost 2 buy ins in a few hours (1 table)
Gonna move down stake to regain my confidence.

Sent from my ASUS_Z00VD using Tapatalk
Is 10 buy in enough? Quote

      
m