Quote:
Ignoring that "consistently winning" at the expense of EV is lol,
How is this 'lol' when you're doing it at the expense of a not insignificant RoR with a bad BR?
Think about it: Would you take
a) 1000 games at 60/40 advantage each game if you have only one buy-in
Or
b) 1000 games at 55/45 if you have 10 buy-ins
Once you have enough bankroll to push your RoR under 5% (or whatever risk you feel acceptable) then you can go for the higher variance route.