Quote:
Originally Posted by ToiletBowler
What an awfully long way to say “I don’t know”
Or a very short way of saying 'It is a question of inaccurate assumptions and lacking in precision, rendering it almost totally unanswerable'
If I were going to elaborate on Sixfours much more succinct response, it would go something like....
Can you be specific with regards to why you consider AI (and which specific AI enigne...not all programs use the same approach) to have an exploitable wekaness if they can beat the best human players? Can you describe the weakness in more detail beyond a vague reference to pisitional play and abstract concepts? Can you tell us which poker AI approach you are are trying to compare to (neural network based machine learning, or mathematically deduced GTO models)? Can you tell us why you think poker and chess are equivalent, even though they are very fundamentally different (aside from the complete versus incomplete information, there is also the matter of number of players, and variance.)
This seems like a silly, pretentious question that really cannot be answered in its current form.