Hello again. I promised you some interesting results, so here are some. (435 respondents)
Players could rate themselves as a rec, experienced rec, aspiring pro, semi-pro and pro. This table shows how these groups rate different methods of studying from 1 to 5. Percentage in blue next to it shows how many of those have experience with that method. For example only 10 % of recreational players had experience with video subscription.
This shows viewbase of some larger poker Youtube channels. (text above and under is Czech, but easily understandable as the type of players are in the same order - rec, exp. rec, asp. pro, semi-pro, pro.
If we were to average it out by giving recs skill level 1, experienced recs 2, aspiring pros 3, semi-pros 4 and pros 5, then this would be average skill level of viewbase. Sorry Dnegs.